Started By
Message

re: Rank the Top 10 college baseball programs OF ALL-TIME

Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:07 am to
Posted by LSUTIGERS8181
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2012
10072 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:07 am to
Titles are what matters. LSU over UT. USC hasn’t had a 40wi. Season since 2005. They still have 12 championships though.
Posted by IM_4_LSU
Augusta, GA
Member since Mar 2014
9085 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:14 am to
quote:

Objectively,Texas is ahead of LSU all-time. LSU has one more title, but Texas has 19 more CWS appearances. Unless titles are all that matter, in which case ranking them doesn't take much thought.


Texas and USC are the only ones with a history longer than LSU but Texas didn't win the Titles and haven't won a title since what 2005 or 2006? So its been almost two decades...I would either have Texas slightly ahead of LSU or have Texas and LSU tied for 2nd on the ALL-TIME top 10 list.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
30985 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:37 am to
quote:

Not many people cared about college baseball until ESPN started showing games in the early 80s.


Not many cared about it for quite a while after that as well. To a large degree, ESPN still treats it almost like an afterthought relative to other sports though that is getting better. Every game being available on ESPN+ or SEC+ was a godsend for me, even though people liked to gripe about that.
Posted by grizzlylongcut
Member since Sep 2021
9647 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 8:22 am to
quote:

1.) USC
2.) LSU


Gtfo. USC was good when college baseball was a backwater nothing. They have been shite for a long arse time.
Posted by WPBTiger
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2011
31298 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 10:04 am to
quote:

LSU should have beaten USC in 1998


Snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29875 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 11:29 am to
Purple and gold glasses me all you want. LSU is number 1 for baseball.
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12506 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 11:46 am to
I guess it depends on what you mean by "past history is the only thing that counts". I see post after post weighting LSU's & Texas' accomplishments because they are more recent, but that doesn't fit with how I understand the qualifier. In terms of how the question was asked, imo, USC is the Notre Dame of college baseball. They undoubtedly have a more decorated and accomplished history. So if you point an unfiltered lens backwards through time at college baseball, they are objectively the top program, since they have accomplished the ultimate goal FAR more often than anyone else.

All the other stuff about relative competition levels, notoriety of the sport, etc., all fall outside of the limiter "past history is the only thing that counts", imo.

Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17379 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

USCs baseball run in the 70s is a bit like UCLAs basketball run in the 60s/70s. Neither has been a major power since.


UCLA hoops still routinely makes the tourney and has gone on some deep runs even recently. Even if they haven't won it all theyre still an above average hoops program and still very much relevant in the sport.

USC baseball has made the field of 64 once in the last 18 years. They've become a completely irrelevant afterthought. I'd argue an even bigger drop-off than Nebraska football.
Posted by TigerKing19
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2020
623 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 12:13 pm to
I agree. Appearances don't mean near as much. Just imagine if a team had 20 CWS appearances and zero titles?
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17379 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Just imagine if a team had 20 CWS appearances and zero titles?


FSU has 23 appearances and still hasn't hit paydirt. Only even been runner up 3 times out of all those. Kinda incredible honestly.
Posted by Who_Dat_Tiger
Member since Nov 2015
17980 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

I agree. Appearances don't mean near as much. Just imagine if a team had 20 CWS appearances and zero titles?
you mean FSU?

23 CWS appearances, only 3x runners-up, 0 titles.
Posted by Newgene
Waveland, MS
Member since Nov 2005
7241 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Objectively,Texas is ahead of LSU all-time. LSU has one more title, but Texas has 19 more CWS appearances. Unless titles are all that matter, in which case ranking them doesn't take much thought.


Yeah but it’s a similar analogy again of Ivy League football. 23 of their appearances were between 1949 and 1985. Since LSU’s first CWS appearance in 1986, Texas has 15 appearances and 2 titles. It’s historically significant, but it’s mostly outside the modern era. It’s likely fair to say that Texas would have more if LSU did not become the powerhouse they are. However, LSU has changed all that drastically.
Posted by Big Bang Rookie
Louisiana
Member since May 2017
771 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Objectively,Texas is ahead of LSU all-time. LSU has one more title, but Texas has 19 more CWS appearances. Unless titles are all that matter, in which case ranking them doesn't take much thought.


I Think differently about this LSU won 7 championships with 19 less chances then Texas so LSU did it faster making them the better team!
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Objectively,Texas is ahead of LSU all-time. LSU has one more title, but Texas has 19 more CWS appearances. Unless titles are all that matter


Objectively titles are what matter and the overall look but titles are what matter the most. Like the poster said earlier LSU 7 is much more impressive than USC 12. Had USC won those 12 when there was competition than USC would be ahead.
1.LSU
2. USC
3. Texas
This post was edited on 7/2/23 at 1:20 pm
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 1:21 pm to
No way Mike Martin died peacefully. That would haunt me in my dreams
Posted by West Bank Dan
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2010
740 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 2:19 pm to
Fun exercise - reminds me of a very good debate about parity in college baseball on the rant about a year ago. One thing this list does is it reminds me how much of this sport has migrated from California and Arizona to the southeast. I mean, we took Arizona’s coach not long after he took a team to the CWS…

Mind-boggling that USC hardly even makes the tournament anymore. When was the last time Fullerton looked scary? Arizona State?
Posted by CoyoteSong
Colorado
Member since Aug 2021
2603 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 4:52 pm to
1. USC
2. LSU
3. Texas

National championships matter
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40808 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 6:35 pm to
Of being capitalized made me think this was ranking outfielders at first
Posted by PigDog33
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2021
770 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 6:43 pm to
Just order them by number of titles.
When talking about all time historical ranking that’s all that matters.

Or just make a list picking your favorites teams at the top and debate people for fun.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39890 posts
Posted on 7/2/23 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

I’d bet a decent amount that the next 5 national champs will come from this group:
I’ll take that bet. There will be a Coastal Carolina or a Fresno State in there somewhere. Plus you don’t have last season’s champs in that list. As much as I hate it, TAMU could do it.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram