Started By
Message

re: The Curious Case of Natalia Grace

Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:22 pm to
Posted by drunkenpunkin
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
7659 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:22 pm to
True, but the staff at the mental hospital did say she had public hair. That's not normal.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
6925 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

True, but the staff at the mental hospital did say she had public hair.


You mean the anonymous staff, who sounded like orderlies -if they even worked there at all-and if they even truly witnessed these things first hand-but we’ll never know bc they’re so credible that they didnt even need to leave their names—who are flagrantly disclosing protected patient information?

Those staff at such an illustrious institution that apparently they failed to recognize the blaring signs of abuse that any half retarded parent would pick up on?



Maybe it’s just me, but I do not find these staffs accounts beyond scrutiny.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
6925 posts
Posted on 6/1/23 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

That's not normal.


Really depends on what her true age is, or was at the time.

If she was really born in September 2003, she would’ve 8 at the time of that admission, closer to nine. And in that case, yes it would be on the early side of things, but it wouldn’t be abnormal, technically speaking.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram