re: A list of the 54 Texas Democrats who shot down citizen-only voting rights

quote:

---

Explain the logic of requiring national citizenship to vote in local elections. Leave the childish insults aside.

---

Because States are not allowed the create a specific sub citizenship. National citizenship is the only legal category allowed because the founding fathers never imagined a time when half of the population hated America so much that they would want foreigners to decide how they are governed.

Because local regulations have a history of shaping federal level policy.

quote:

---

Explain the logic of requiring national citizenship to vote in local elections.

---

1. Because there's no such thing as local citizenship, and

2. It's a slippery slope designed to normalize national voting on an incremental basis. it's how the Democrats accomplish everything they do. Long games and incrementalism.

If you dispute point number two, what do you think the universal Democrat vote is in response to?

quote:

---

Explain the logic of requiring national citizenship to vote in local elections

---

1. Non-citizens, even if here legally, have not undergone the extensive vetting that goes with the citizenship process. We don't even know who these people are for certain. They come here with questionable documentation.

2. They have not learned about our government system. Even our local laws have to follow the constitution.

3. Our election system is fragile and the worst thing for any election is distrust. There is already a lot of distrust, and allowing non-citizens to vote - even in local elections - would cause additional mistrust in the system.

4. If would enable widespread abuse in the election process. There is already abuse, but given even small access would allow even more.

quote:

---

Explain the logic

---

trying to explain logic to a hard core left wing radical is aan exercise in futility, if not a contradiction in terms.

You know the reasons why it is a bad idea - and you know the reason left wing radicals want it so much.

In short - it is just another pile of names that can be used for 'ballot' purposes - and if not by outlright cheating, then as a pressure point for the next outrage about 'disadvantaged voters' or whatever bullshite rolls off the tongues on extreme leftists anytime they want to further muddle an issue.

You want this for the same reason you want more illegal aliens present in the county - to increase the pressure to 'take care of these poor souls' by 'at least' giving them the VOTE to 'determine their own future'

It is the holy grail - extend voting RIGHTS as much as possible - your leaders want it to be lowered to 16 years old, let illegal aliens vote, let prisoners vote, let vagrants vote,

hell - let ANYONE vote if they are in a situation where they are easily misled, are without wisdom to evaluate cause/effect, unconcerned with who they hell is going to have to foot the bill for whatever they 'vote for' etc.

You know it - we know it - we know you know it - you are preaching to the uninformed, uncaring, irresponsible with your rhetoric.

shame on you.

edit - oh - and the clincher - you want more illiterate, irresponsible, dim-witted, parasitic, mentally deficient people represented on the voting rolls. That way your 'harvesters' have TARGETs of you 'harvesters' all bundled up in a group who normally dont even know what a "vote" actually means, could not care less if they did, and are willing to sell out their franchise for another swig of Mogen David.

u know it - we know it - we know u know it

stfu.

quote:

---

Explain the logic of requiring national citizenship to vote in local elections. Leave the childish insults aside.

---

You want an expliaintion of something that has been common sense for 100s of years? You deserve the insults. And you are the one that should be providing the argument of merit.

LOL AggieHank, the geniuses at TexAgs have decided that I am you.

LINK