re: The Times reporting the CIA destroyed Nordstream

I’ve been following this drama thru meetings.

Regarding unnamed sources- WTAF now this is a problem

Fueling credibility of the unnamed source is the lack of any source named or unnamed that can identify evidence that Russia blew up its own fricking pipeline. Not even evidence -
But some kind of benefit that Russia would gain by wrecking its own infrastructure or bargaining power. It’s just implausible on its face.

and there is nothing that Potatus administration says that’s true - from
Spy balloons to Republican positions on social security to the names of laws in Florida

This makes me furious