- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hunters in PA challenging Wildlife Agent searches on Private Property
Posted on 2/6/22 at 1:26 pm to Decisions
Posted on 2/6/22 at 1:26 pm to Decisions
Should we let the criminal kill a live deer or steal someone else's car? The offender knows it is a crime either way.
Is an undercover pretending to be someone they are not also entrapment?
I’d also argue it is a great deterrent of crime as well.
Is an undercover pretending to be someone they are not also entrapment?
I’d also argue it is a great deterrent of crime as well.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 1:36 pm to lotik
I don't see a problem with bait cars and a bait deer at night. I honestly wouldn't look twice at either. I wouldn't shoot a deer at night and I wouldn't steal the car. The people that would are the people that would do that already. There is room for the legal ambiguity with both tactics but I'm sure the Courts have long ruled on bait car stuff and robot deer.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 4:02 pm to BorrisMart
I remember a judge ( I think Jackson Parish) one time told the game wardens to get a smaller racked mechanical deer because the one they had would even tempt him to shoot at it. Lol.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 4:26 pm to Outdoorreb
quote:Damn son. 4th amendment. I saw a violation on the La Law game warden show-green jeans looked into the back of a parked truck and started taking pics of what he thought was deer hair and blood. These dudes (LDWF ENFORCEMENT) are completely out of control. I’m anxious to see the shite they pull with the CWD rules-IE road blocks and shite.
I don’t understand what the problem is. If you are legal then what is wrong? Are the same kind of person that screams entrapment when you shoot a robotic deer off the side of a road at night?
The baiting ban will lead to these slap dicks cruising your property at will.
This post was edited on 2/6/22 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 2/6/22 at 4:34 pm to White Bear
Game wardens are welcomed on my property.
Imagine the outlawing that would occur if this passed? I understand we have rights, but the purpose of this law is to protect the game and fish of the state. If game wardens lost this ability our resources would definitely be in jeopardy.
Coonasses with property with no possibility of a game warden showing up?? What could go wrong??
Imagine the outlawing that would occur if this passed? I understand we have rights, but the purpose of this law is to protect the game and fish of the state. If game wardens lost this ability our resources would definitely be in jeopardy.
Coonasses with property with no possibility of a game warden showing up?? What could go wrong??
Posted on 2/6/22 at 4:36 pm to White Bear
Posted on 2/6/22 at 4:56 pm to bushwacker
quote:
Game wardens are welcomed on my property.
Imagine the outlawing that would occur if this passed? I understand we have rights, but the purpose of this law is to protect the game and fish of the state. If game wardens lost this ability our resources would definitely be in jeopardy.
Coonasses with property with no possibility of a game warden showing up?? What could go wrong??
I am not anti game warden by any means and I have respect for the good ones for sure. But the private property issue is what I am more interested in from a legal perspective. American law was founded on the sanctity of private land owners.
ETA:
@Sparkinator, that is hilarious. But as someone mentioned earlier, if I had private property that I was using for hunting, I would be fully legal anyway and would sleep peacefully at night. I do think the green jeans are totally necessary for poachers and trespassers. But some might say they are trespassing (even if they are granted that power), and seems a little dangerous to be walking around private property during the season.
I have heard stories about them checking trucks on private property for hair and what not.
This post was edited on 2/6/22 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 2/6/22 at 5:22 pm to bushwacker
quote:Food for you.
Game wardens are welcomed on my property.
quote:What you should understand is the outlaws are going to do their thing no matter if LDWF has 20k agents or one per Parish. Most people are reasonable and law-abiding. The deer weren’t wiped out during the decades of the honor system limit when LDWF had fewer agents per Parish, I think in the 90’s it was like two per Parish.
Imagine the outlawing that would occur if this passed? I understand we have rights, but the purpose of this law is to protect the game and fish of the state. If game wardens lost this ability our resources would definitely be in jeopardy.
Coonasses with property with no possibility of a game warden showing up?? What could go wrong??
This post was edited on 2/6/22 at 5:24 pm
Posted on 2/6/22 at 5:23 pm to EF Hutton
They broad authority, no doubt.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 6:47 pm to lotik
It's always the poachers that complain about this.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 7:13 pm to Outdoorreb
Actually the public owns the animals, this is to prevent the landed gentry from hunting illegally, over harvesting and impacting the resource.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 9:06 pm to ecb
quote:
It's always the poachers that complain about this.
Posted on 2/6/22 at 9:26 pm to lotik
If you have your land fenced good, i can see a clear argument that the animals there are yours and the state shouldn’t be able to regulate them at all. Maybe open land is different, but I’ve been on some high fence hunting land that was more like a zoo or pen than a wild area.
Posted on 2/7/22 at 7:29 am to ecb
Such a bad take.
Does it make me criminal for not wanting police to have the ability to walk into my house without a warrant?
Does it make me criminal for not wanting police to have the ability to walk into my house without a warrant?
Posted on 2/7/22 at 7:37 am to TBoy
quote:
If you have your land fenced good, i can see a clear argument that the animals there are yours and the state shouldn’t be able to regulate them at all.
I really wonder sometimes how people come to these types of conclusions. Do you really believe that if you fence in a bunch of wild animals they somehow become your property?
Posted on 2/7/22 at 9:22 am to Decisions
quote:
quote:
I don’t understand what the problem is. If you are legal then what is wrong? Are the same kind of person that screams entrapment when you shoot a robotic deer off the side of a road at night?
Unbelievable.
It’s so obvious those who’ve never owned much of anything and thus don’t care about maintaining the sanctity of private property.
I own a decent amount of land and have no problem with Wildlife doing their job. In the US, 74% of all land is privately owned; how can Wildlife possibly do their jobs without going onto private lands? (I'm not talking about going in your home or even in your camp/shack/trailer/barn. A permit should be required for that.) But these guys need access to the lands with wildlife habitat to enforce laws.
They visit the deer camp in Arkansas every year to check licenses, inspect kills/tags. I wish they patrolled MORE, but most states can't afford it.
Posted on 2/7/22 at 9:47 am to Outdoorreb
quote:
Do whatever you want on your own land, but don’t get mad when a warden comes looking for you because you were bragging about the shite.
Obtain a warrant like any other case. It really is that simple.
Posted on 2/7/22 at 11:30 am to dat yat
quote:
In the US, 74% of all land is privately owned; how can Wildlife possibly do their jobs without going onto private lands? (I'm not talking about going in your home or even in your camp/shack/trailer/barn. A permit should be required for that.) But these guys need access to the lands with wildlife habitat to enforce laws.
I don’t think anyone is advocating that they can never enter private lands, just that they should be required to have some reasonable suspicion or probable cause like every other law enforcement agency in the country. In the age of social media coupled with the general dumbassery of those who commit violations it’s not that big of a burden.
We’ve had wardens that will sit on public roads and listen for shots after legal hours, then enter property if they hear one. That’s perfectly fine. Then we had a non-uniformed warden who decided to take his ole lady and dog joyriding through our lease on his personal sxs and acted indignant when we questioned why he was on the property, and insinuated we’d be seeing a lot more of him for daring to question why. They’ve walked up on us, wearing no orange themselves at 430pm, just to spend til dark finding we’re 100% legal. They’ll steal cards from cameras over a perfectly legal feeder just on the off chance you poured some of the sack on the ground.
Having zero barrier to enter property and the petty nature of enforcement makes people distrust them and more prone to keeping their mouth shut. That’s the eventuality of overreach. I’d argue THAT enables poaching more than anything.
Posted on 2/7/22 at 11:46 am to lotik
There is no reason wardens should be exempt from the same constitutional constraints that law enforcement is under.
If you need a warrant to search for drugs or a murder weapon you should need one to look in my deep freezer
If you need a warrant to search for drugs or a murder weapon you should need one to look in my deep freezer
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News