- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
SEC WEST?
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:33 pm
If Missouri and A&M are in the west will BAMA or Auburn shift to the east? It doesn't make sense for anyone else to be there...
2
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:34 pm to ROUSSEL77
Alabama makes the most sense in order to preserve the Iron Bowl and the Tennessee rivalry.
Posted on 10/6/11 at 1:35 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Alabama makes the most sense in order to preserve the Iron Bowl and the Tennessee rivalry.
Deep Souths Oldest Rivalry says otherwise
Posted on 10/6/11 at 2:31 pm to Hubbhogg
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/6/11 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 10/6/11 at 2:32 pm to tcomea3
auburn period.. most sense geographically..
Posted on 10/6/11 at 3:04 pm to tcomea3
Mizzou will be in the East.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 9:07 am to ROUSSEL77
quote:
If Missouri and A&M are in the west will BAMA or Auburn shift to the east? It doesn't make sense for anyone else to be there...
Send them both to the east and bring Florida to the west.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 9:13 am to Nuts4LSU
Send both East and bring Vandy West.
Posted on 10/7/11 at 9:18 am to Nuts4LSU
Fla will never agree to go west. Outside of USC, They are most eastern team of all, geographically speaking. Really, you could move MSU to the East and make Ole Miss their cross-rival then that way no significant rivalries are lost. However, the balance of power would swing even more to West. As far as balance, Auburn to the East makes the most sense. Looking at all-time winning %, this scenario provides an almost equal % between the two divisions.
This post was edited on 10/7/11 at 9:19 am
Posted on 10/7/11 at 9:28 am to will0637
Move Auburn to the East, and bring their turn in Alabama's Eastern foe rotation up to the next two schedules. TN could remain Alabama's permanent opponent.
I'm going on the premise Auburn could be back in the West after those two seasons, due to the high probability of eastern expansion to 16 teams.
I'm going on the premise Auburn could be back in the West after those two seasons, due to the high probability of eastern expansion to 16 teams.
Posted on 10/8/11 at 9:49 am to will0637
quote:
Fla will never agree to go west
I have no idea whether they would or not, but if they could keep Georgia as their permanent inter-divisional rival, I don't see why they wouldn't agree. Most of their traditional (pre-1992) rivals are in the West, and only one (Georgia) is in the East. Auburn would be another one, but they already quit playing Auburn every year with the schedule format change in 2002.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News