- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mizzou's 2012 conference schedule
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:42 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:42 pm
Assuming Texas A&M is their crossover rival and the SEC stays at a 8 game schedule, that leaves one random team from the West. I think the SEC should make it Arkansas to make Mizzou feel a little more comfortable. Arkansas is their closest opponent. Mizzou actually borders 4 SEC schools (UK, Ten, Van, and Ark)
2012 schedule:
arkansas (random west opponent for 2 years)
texas a&m (permanent crossover rival)
kentucky
tennessee
vandy
south carolina
georgia
florida
2012 schedule:
arkansas (random west opponent for 2 years)
texas a&m (permanent crossover rival)
kentucky
tennessee
vandy
south carolina
georgia
florida
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 12:44 pm
5
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:52 pm to will0637
They'd be favored vs. UK and Vandy but that's probably it
Posted on 11/9/11 at 12:59 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
They'd be favored vs. UK and Vandy but that's probably it
Lucky for us, the games are played on the field.
Some of you are selling us way too short based on a transition year.
Not saying we are going to come in and win the East, but we will win some games that some here think we wont.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:12 pm to will0637
quote:
Assuming Texas A&M is their crossover rival and the SEC stays at a 8 game schedule
I think your assumptions are wrong. 9 game schedule and arkansas make more sense.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:17 pm to kilo
Mizzou and Texas A&M will both be shortchanged in the court of public opinion unless and until they prove otherwise on the field of play. Just the way it is.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 1:43 pm to will0637
quote:
Assuming Texas A&M is their crossover rival
Gonna be Arky IMO
Posted on 11/9/11 at 4:13 pm to ehidal1
I think Arkansas makes more sense as a permanent for Mizzou but I am not sure what MIzzou thinks about that. They may want TAMU for recruiting purposes. If it is Arky, then I would think for 2012-13, they would match Mizzou up with TAMU as their random crossdivision opponent. I just dont see the SEC moving to 9 games unless they changed the neutral site SEC Title game to having the best record host it. None of the other major conferences have 9 games and a title game. Pac12 has 9 but the best team hosts the Title game, the ACC\Big10 have 8 games and neutral site Title games, and the Big12 doesnt have a Title game anymore.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 4:35 pm to will0637
Everyone in east will want A&M as their permanent due to recruiting Houston.
Mizzou's goose is cooked with that schedule, and for years to come. Going back to hoops school.
Mizzou's goose is cooked with that schedule, and for years to come. Going back to hoops school.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 4:52 pm to will0637
quote:
They may want TAMU for recruiting purposes
Missouri should get no say.
LSU-UF needs to end and the way to do that is to match us with USCe, Florida with TAMU and Missou with Arky
Posted on 11/9/11 at 5:10 pm to will0637
It's going to be a 9-game schedule next year.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 5:17 pm to BayouBengals03
Slive said it would be 8 games. I think that sucks.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 9:23 am to miketiger
quote:
Slive said it would be 8 games. I think that sucks.
8 games sucks with 7 team divisions... but probably not as badly as 9 games
9 means unequal schedules and an uneven playing field. that is even worse than not playing opposite division opponents often enough
Posted on 11/10/11 at 10:01 am to kilo
quote:
Some of you are selling us way too short based on a transition year.
Not saying we are going to come in and win the East, but we will win some games that some here think we wont.
Bookmarked for next year. We'll see where you are.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:10 pm to will0637
That schedule gives Mizzou an opportunity to win some games. Nobody on the schedule is like an Alabama or LSU.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:26 pm to mrbayoublu
I like that schedule. There isn't a team in it that Mizzou couldn't beat from one year to the next, a few we will beat consistently, and one we just beat a couple weeks ago.
Oh, and T-horn - be careful spouting too much. Tejas could easily lose its next four games THIS year.
Oh, and T-horn - be careful spouting too much. Tejas could easily lose its next four games THIS year.
This post was edited on 11/10/11 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:32 pm to molsusports
quote:
9 means unequal schedules and an uneven playing field. that is even worse than not playing opposite division opponents often enough
That's why ten games is needed.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 4:34 pm to C
Lose the permanent cross division games except for those who insist on it.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 5:51 pm to Aux Arc
Personally, I'm glad we are heading to the East. For now, it is down and we shouldn't get embarrassed there. The West would be rough.
Posted on 11/11/11 at 12:55 pm to kilo
9 game schedule???? NO WAY. 8 games is it - 7 in division (w/ a 3/4 home rotation) and a leapfrogging rotation from the east. SEC wants to do away with the permanent opponent (don't you Florida???)
Posted on 11/12/11 at 4:44 pm to Rex Manning
quote:GTFO!
LSU-UF needs to end
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News