Started By
Message
locked post

Mizzou fans: break down your recruiting

Posted on 11/6/11 at 1:49 pm
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 1:49 pm
Why are so many players from Texas? Do St. Louis an KC not produce enough talent for MU or do the kids not stay in state?

IYO, does a move to the SEC help in locking down the state players?

Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68478 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 1:57 pm to
I would think the better athletes come from Texas rather than Missouri. If I was their HC that's where i would look first. Hell, their best player ever came from Texas
Posted by daboman of Aggieland
Columbia, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1330 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:08 pm to
It's not just Missouri. Look through rosters. Texas high school talent is stocking the entire Big 12. High school football is crazy here.
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:09 pm to
I think they need to start implementing football camps and programs across the state. I know Pinkel has attempted to do this, but they need a lot of help with recruiting.

If they could increase interest in the state, they would become a monster. Very similar to LSU, they are the ONLY in state program around. Plus, they ave a bigger population than LA.

Obviously this should start in areas like St. Louis and KC, but it should be spread across the state.


I've lived in MO and I know firsthand that MU football support is non existent (compared to SEC state schools) in parts of the state. And by non existent, I mean that you'll probably not even hear much about the conference change in that state. People won't really even be talking about it. They will, however, be talking about the Cards championship and the Chiefs game today.
This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 2:13 pm
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
25965 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Very similar to LSU


Think Tennessee when you are talking about Missosuri football talent.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:13 pm to
More like UK. The talent level is about the same as Missouri's.
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:14 pm to
I'm not talking about current talent level. Missouri COULD e better at football than most schools. They have all the resources, but haven't utilized them.

Tennessee and Kentucky wouldn't be comparable if they locked the state up and the people just cared more.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
25965 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Missouri COULD e better at football than most schools.


This move will help them no doubt "come play in the SEC close to home" is something kids in the region have not heard.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:17 pm to
The deciding factor is whether those kids commit first, or Mizzou has their first sub 6 win season in awhile first IMO. Which will most likely happen in their first 3 years.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
25965 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:20 pm to
If Mizzou can hold on to their TX recruiting and A&M in the conference will help that, and they can lock down the talent MO does produce, and then branch out and pull a couple of players from new territory I think they have the chance to be a decent SEC team. I see them as another Arkansas.
Posted by busey
First Coast, Florida
Member since Feb 2010
22958 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:22 pm to
Maybe. But at the expense of which current SEC team? That's something people here tend to forget. There are only so many wins to go around.
Posted by DoUrden
UnderDark
Member since Oct 2011
25965 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 2:25 pm to
The mess that is the East right now take your pick, but UF and UT will find their way back. They will battle for 2-4 in the east, of course some years they will be lower.
Posted by Rickie
Portland, ME
Member since Aug 2010
2927 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:06 pm to
Mizzou will have a much tougher time recruiting Texas now

STL/KC kids won't be enough, be interesting to see what direction they go with recruiting

Posted by TigerMattSTL
O'Fallon, MO
Member since Aug 2011
1105 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 3:47 pm to
Missouri has lost a ton of instate talent over the years to the Big 10 schools for a long time. The Big 10 was always seen as being a bigger name conference than the Big 12.

In recent years, a lot of players have been lost to the SEC. Hopefully that will change now that kids can play for the home state school while being in the premier conference.
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

The mess that is the East right now take your pick, but UF and UT will find their way back. They will battle for 2-4 in the east, of course some years they will be lower.



This. I imagine they will have a few great years mixed in with very average years for the next 10-15 years.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421936 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

If they could increase interest in the state, they would become a monster. Very similar to LSU, they are the ONLY in state program around. Plus, they ave a bigger population than LA.

they don't produce that much talent

pretty sure MO is more of a basketball state
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421936 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Missouri COULD e better at football than most schools. They have all the resources, but haven't utilized them

they don't have the in-state recruits
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram