Started By
Message
locked post

14 or 16 teams

Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:46 pm
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:46 pm
Which would you rather?
Posted by Damn Good Dawg
Member since Feb 2011
47325 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:48 pm to
12

14 otherwise
Posted by LesMilesMorePryor
Member since Sep 2010
1125 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:49 pm to
14 > 16 , simple math
Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:54 pm to
Depends. If you are only going to have 2 div, then 14. If you are able to have 4 div and the extra playoff game, then 16. You can actually create a better sense of belonging to the whole because you can rotate playing the whole conference a little quicker (have to get rid of the permanent foe though).
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

12


Touche'
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9113 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:54 pm to
If expansion is inevitable then definitely 14. I don`t think people realize just big a clusterf### a 16 team will create.
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:55 pm to
Let's say 2 or 1 mega division
Posted by jladne3
Houston
Member since Nov 2010
1173 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:57 pm to
14
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33939 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 6:59 pm to
quote:

12

14 otherwise

Posted by KJA
Dallas
Member since Apr 2011
258 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:01 pm to
12. Everyone is all giddy over expansion because it is "new" and "interesting" with no regard to how it will actually change the product.

9 Conference games is going to do several things: make it harder to see an undefeated or one less champion, lesson the occurance of exciting OOC matchups, and create an "unfairity" each year between 4 and 5 home conference games.

You will play a lower percentage of teams in your conference, and depending on the alignment, could lose some of the league's best rivalries.

The fan shouldn't be worrying about TV dollars or anything else. The 12 team-8 games and a championship format has done wonders for the league and allowed it to become the best in the country. There is no possible reason to try to mess it up. Also, I worry about other conferences following suit and a playoff to follow that would further diminish the importance of the regular season, which as is, is the best in sports.
Posted by 1LoudTideFan
Member since May 2008
3596 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:13 pm to
14 is fine with me.

I think we are going for 14 now with designs on eventually getting to 16 in a few years.

Posted by Indiana Tiger
Member since Feb 2005
4057 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Let's say 2 or 1 mega division

14, but I don't like the mega division idea at all. Too many teams and too much opportunity to miss good teams. The divisions expand hope when one sucks, like 2001 LSU or SC last year.
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4450 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:16 pm to
I agree and I just don't see how 4 divisions would work
Posted by tiger perry
Member since Dec 2009
25668 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

12

14 otherwise



this
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21662 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:19 pm to
quote:

9 Conference games is going to do several things


I think if this expansion happens, the SEC needs to do away with the permanent opponent from the opposite division. That way we can have 8 conference games as we do now with 2 rotating games against the other division.
Posted by KJA
Dallas
Member since Apr 2011
258 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:26 pm to
If you're only going to play 2/7 teams in the other division, what's the point of even being in the same conference? 12 is both the optimal and maximum number; any bigger and it is essentially 2 separate conferences.
Posted by TheIrishFro
Member since Aug 2010
4709 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:33 pm to
old 16 team WAC says sure try out a 16 team conference, right after it gets done laughing it arse off
Posted by KJA
Dallas
Member since Apr 2011
258 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:34 pm to
How did they format that?
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21662 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

If you're only going to play 2/7 teams in the other division, what's the point of even being in the same conference?


So, playing 3/7 makes it way better? And, the point of being in the same conference is to have strong schools who can generate revenue for each of the schools to share.
Posted by KJA
Dallas
Member since Apr 2011
258 posts
Posted on 8/13/11 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

So, playing 3/7 makes it way better?


No, I don't think either is a good number and that's part of why I'm against any expansion. And as to generating revenue, I obviously understand that these moves are primarily money-related. But I'm a fan; I don't care about money past the point that it makes our schools able to pay top coaches and fund top facilities, which we are already able to do.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram