Started By
Message

re: Commie Pope Francis Tells 60 Minutes that Conservativism Is “A Suicidal Attitude”

Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:10 am to
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
10534 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:10 am to
Does the pope cling to that palace that he enjoys for free and the lavish lifestyle?

Is he living the life that Jesus espoused?

Kinda hypocritical to critique and endorse taxation on those that work hard to become prosperous while living in a palace with security guards and 5 star meals all funded by those that work hard to be prosperous …. (Pass the hat) and pays zero tax on those dollars.


This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 8:52 am
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48582 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I could see how these teachings could influence Catholic thought to the point the Pope is spouting Marxist ideas.


We should also be reminded that, right after Jesus's time on Earth, the Apostles themselves adopted a sort of economic collective model for the Early Church. This model shares some close similarity to socialism.

Because the Church started out from the beginning with some "socialist tendencies", it should be no surprise that a Catholic Priest from Argentina might grow up and grow old with some political and economic theories that are Leftist and far off of the solid mark that we in the USA would call "Conservative Political and Economic Policy."

Conservative Americans and Pope Francis have absolutely nothing in common when it comes to economic and government policy, because we disagree on the issue of Governmental Power over Private Life.
This post was edited on 5/18/24 at 10:33 am
Posted by Foch
Member since Feb 2015
760 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:38 am to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Twitter Link



Again, see CBS' tweet and then watch the video. For all those quick to dunk on the Pope, take a step back and ask yourself if maybe, possibly, potentially, the MSM has an agenda in distorting what Francis is saying. Ask yourself what has been changed by Francis.

Then, watch the video. He clearly establishes that there can be no blessing of a homosexual relationship. There is no ordered, God-designed union. It is entirely disordered.

Consider these analogies: do you think the media accurately reports on the context, intent, and meaning of what is said by Billy Graham? For you Baptists, do you trust the MSM to accurately report on the actions of the SBC? Do you non-denoms rush to clarify when the MSM paints everyone involved with Liberty as being complicit or hypocritical in the recent Falwell scandal?

Sure, Pope Francis frequently does himself no favors. I have posted extensively about where there are grounds for legitimate criticism. Still, most on this board and in this thread take every MSM summary of the Pope's words as an accurate portrayal of what he says and believes.

Posted by Foch
Member since Feb 2015
760 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Conservative Americans and Pope Francis have absolutely nothing in common when it comes to economic and government policy, because we disagree on the issue of Governmental Power over Private Life.


Only issue I would bring up with your statement is that once again, this is an example of Francis being entirely vague in his proposed remedies for the problems he describes.

Take inequality or greed, he has spoken extensively about it but has stopped short of calling for government intervention and government redistribution. This leads each side to infer what they want (Pope is a socialist!).

Additionally, we on the board look at this purely through an American lense. Ask yourself if his comments on the abuse of workers and nature have any truth in the developing world.

Is it OK for large corporations to poison the earth and workers at the bottom of a supply chain so that we in the developed world can chase green energy? Is it OK for actual slave labor in places like China to be the engine that supports a throw away culture of consumerism and materialism?

Where are the kudos when he calls out the willingness of the first world to poison the third world with subsidized abortion, Contraception, and gender ideology?

Bottom line, the Pope is vague and the Pope speaks to many audiences at one time.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48582 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 11:01 am to
You are absolutely right in these two posts of yours. No doubt.

Yes, it's true that he doesn't specifically call for Government Power/Control to deal with Climate Change, but, I do suspect that his political background would support that.

I also would like to comment on your observation that the MSM often will distort Pope Francis's comments in order to cause some controversy. You are correct.

Also, I take note that every time some MSM source that hates Christianity does this sort of thing, we can rely on some of our brother Protestants to gleefully use the news article as a topic to unleash another round of Catholic-bashing on Tigerdroppings.

Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48582 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Where are the kudos when he calls out the willingness of the first world to poison the third world with subsidized abortion, Contraception, and gender ideology?


Tigerdroppings PT and OT will bash Catholicism, not come out in any kind of support for it. You already know that, but, I support your raising awareness on how things work around here when it comes to that particular issue.

For example, in the thread about the issue of blessing gay people, the board immediately condemned the Catholic Church and the Pope for performing Gay Marriages. There was no search for Truth, just a lusty indulgence in Catholic-bashing.

In closing, I will declare that Conservatism is not a "suicidal attitude". I will need to read a very complete and thorough analysis before I would even consider that conclusion to have any merit whatsoever. The Pope should try to offer some support for this conclusion.
This post was edited on 5/18/24 at 11:12 am
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Why should I re-state to you that which is clearly explained and footnoted in on Catholic Answers and the Catholic Catechism? I haven't got time for that.

Because that’s how a friendly conversation works?

quote:

I haven't got time for that.

Your post history says otherwise.

quote:

Besides, the topic of the thread was how the mainline Protestant denomination of Methodists have officially embraced Homosexual Sex, Homosexual Pastors, Gay Church Marriage and all things Homosexual.

Yes, it was. And I was engaging other posters on this topic; using the infallible Word of God to give proper context to the subject, and refute false teachings. You could have joined me, but you decided to:
quote:

I focused my discussion on how this mainline Protestant denomination has been a Bible Alone denomination for centuries and remains so today

And in doing so, you missed out on an opportunity to condemn the UMC’s departure from the clear teaching of scripture- from a Catholic perspective. Instead, you saw an opportunity to fire a harpoon at your white whale- Sola Scriptura.

quote:

Your questions were an attempt to divert the conversation into a discussion of a list of questions about Catholic theology.

Not to divert, but to bring into the conversation your own beliefs, so that I can better understand your position.

quote:

Why should I help you hijack a thread

I know this sounds petty, but… you started it!

Let’s go back to that discussion. Reply to my last two posts in that thread; and let’s continue our friendly debate.
Posted by theballguy
Colorado Springs, CO
Member since Oct 2011
2765 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Have you ever been to an SSPX service? I have. I guarantee you Baptist Bible-thumpers (not that there's anything wrong with that) would hate it...



I'm Catholic and I've been to plenty of Tridentine Masses.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48582 posts
Posted on 5/18/24 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

condemn the UMC’s departure from the clear teaching of scripture-


My point in the other thread is:

The UMC on this issue accuses YOU of departing from "the clear teaching of scripture". They cite hermeneutics, the study of the original Greek, and all of the Bible-interpretation methods that modern scholarship offers in order to reach the exact opposite of YOUR interpretation.

The Roman Catholics don't have that problem. We have the Catechism, which is printed, and anybody can read it. There is no other Catholic denomination which has an alternate Catechism. As such, there is no need for we Catholics to argue over which Catechism follows "the clear teaching of scripture" because we have one and only one.

As for your other questions posed in the other thread, let me say this: NONE of these questions were questions at all until the Protestant Reformation confused things. All of Christendom was united in theological beliefs before the Prot Reformation, and these questions already had answers.

Let me refer you to the Catechism for your questions that Catholics answered hundreds of years ago.

LINK

Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 4:23 pm to
So you’re not going to engage with anything I said? Lol. Ok.
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
7417 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Pope is vague


Then maybe he shouldn't speak.

His job isn't to speak in such a way his message can be molded like clay into whatever the listener wants.

When Jesus said it is easier for a camel to pass though the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God, he didn't leave much there for interpretation.



Pope John Paul II:

quote:

On Freedom and Responsibility
“The best guarantee of freedom and its real attainment depends upon the responsibility of individuals and peoples, upon the concrete efforts of each person at his own level, in his immediate environment, nationally and internationally. For freedom is not something that is given. It is something to be constantly won. It goes hand in hand with the sense of responsibility that everyone must have.” – From his Message for the Celebration of the Day of Peace, 1981.


quote:

On Family Values:
“As the family goes, so goes the nation, and so goes the whole world in which we live.” – From his Homily in Perth, Australia on November 30, 1986.


Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45410 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

Didn't he just grant the ability of priests to bless homosexual marriages?


Homosexual couples, not marriages.
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48582 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

So you’re not going to engage with anything I said? Lol. Ok.


Why are you trying to get me to answer your ridiculous questions? Should you not be arguing with the millions of Methodists who now embrace Homosexual sexual relations, Homosexual Pastors and same sex marriage?

Why don't you go argue with them? I'll tell you why - it's because you know that you'll hit a brick wall when they argue that, according to the Holy Spirit and Bible Alone, the United Methodist view on God's Plan for Human Sexuality is Ultimate Truth and that YOUR view is false and a lie.

So, why are you still trying to pick a fight with me?

PS Your questions are gone. The post that contained them is no longer listed in the Previous Post feature listing your previous posts.
This post was edited on 5/19/24 at 6:07 pm
Posted by Tenn grad LSU fan
Wouldn't you like to know spazz
Member since Apr 2023
572 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 6:37 pm to
??????????????
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
722 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

Why are you trying to get me to answer your ridiculous questions?

What’s ridiculous about these questions?
- Can someone, who is not a Roman Catholic, enter heaven? Under what circumstances?
- Can a professing Roman Catholic be sent to hell? Why or why not?
- Is the Bible the inspired, inerrant Word of God? How or how not?
- Where does Rome get its authority from? And, how do you know that it’s legitimate? Can you prove it?

I only ask them to gain understanding of your position. I think these questions are perfectly reasonable questions to ask someone who makes the claims that you have made. Peter said:
1 Peter 3:15 (NASB95): always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you, yet with gentleness and reverence;
Feel free to quote directly from the catechism- though it would be more convincing if you could answer these questions using Scripture alone.


quote:

Should you not be arguing with the millions of Methodists who now embrace Homosexual sexual relations, Homosexual Pastors and same sex marriage?

I’d love to. And, I was doing just that, before you turned the thread into an attack on Protestants I hope you realize that I’m just messing with you. But, on a serious note, since we are obviously in agreement on the issue- why can’t we team up on these heretics? After all, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. (I assure you- I do not consider you, or Rome, an enemy)

quote:

Why don't you go argue with them? I'll tell you why - it's because you know that you'll hit a brick wall when they argue that, according to the Holy Spirit and Bible Alone, the United Methodist view on God's Plan for Human Sexuality is Ultimate Truth and that YOUR view is false and a lie.

I was, and I will continue to. I’m not afraid of a brick wall. They are all n obvious error- according to the clear and concise teaching of scripture (and Rome, for that matter).


quote:

So, why are you still trying to pick a fight with me?

I don’t pick fights- defend my position when it is attacked. Go back to the thread and read the posts. I responded to KTiger85’s challenge for intellectual debate (to which he never responded), then Rust Cohle chimed in- to which I responded with a systematic and biblical refutation (which he ultimately abandoned, and found solace in your position), at which point you hijacked the thread and turned it into an attack on Sola Scriptura (and Sola Fide- which is a strange flex, given the context of the original thread). I’m not even a “reformed” anything. I’m not “of Apollos, or Paul, or Peter”- I am of Christ. I don’t have any problem with anything that Rome teaches- that can be backed up with scripture. Moreover, I agree with Rome on the majority of topics concerning the Christian faith. The main point of contention is, always has been, and always will be- the ultimate source of authority; Sola Ecclesia (the church alone) vs Sola Scriptura (the infallible Word of God alone).

We can either continue to debate the ultimate authority, or we can join forces (on the issue of homosexuality ) and blast these heretics into a state of shame (and hopefully repentance) with a 1-2 punch of scripture and tradition. I would much prefer the latter.
Posted by ChestRockwell
In the heart of horse country
Member since Jul 2021
2959 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 9:18 pm to
Quit donating. They, like all organized religions, don't pay taxes. Plus the church has been covering up for priests that like to smell 10 year old boys backsides. I was raised catholic, accomplished 4 of the 7 sacraments. It has done nothing for me, except for wanting to know how a priest of my parish asked if I ever masterbated during a confessional.. Does anyone want these creeps around children? I believe in a higher power, not what these dopes are preaching, no matter what religion. It doesn't cost me anything
This post was edited on 5/19/24 at 9:20 pm
Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48582 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 9:45 pm to
Thanks for the update and reminder of the questions. I'm still not going to answer them in a post on tigerdroppings, because the answers are all there on the Catholic Answers website. You can find the answers there, and those articles can express the answers better than I can.

Your idea about how you and I can join together on the same team arguing against the United Methodists is a great idea. We are on the same team, BUT, the problem is that the Methodist won't accept my answer, which is that I believe that the UMC is wrong on the Homosexual issue because The Catechism of the Roman Catholic Church says that the UMC is wrong. The Catechism's position on this is based on Scripture, and on what the Apostles handed down to the Early Church.

A United Methodist won't be persuaded by my argument, because he will reject what the Catholic Church believes and teaches on this issue.

The problem is that when two Protestants have a debate on this topic, there is no Church hierarchy or teaching authority that is appointed to settle the debate, so the debate will never be settled. The Methodist and the Prodigal Son will each claim that their position is correct based on the Holy Spirit's guidance and inspiration as the Bible Alone is analyzed to find the Truth.

Having a Church Hierarchy and Teaching Authority is a good thing, but, Protestantism is based on the fundamental principle that the Catholic Church is wrong to have a Teaching Authority, because anybody can read his own Bible and discover God's Plan for Human Sexuality right in there - Bible Alone.

So, we still end up with the Methodist and the Prodigal Son pointing at each other saying the same thing simultaneously "You are wrong. What? No. YOU are the one who is wrong, not me."

If I chime in with a suggestion to just follow the Roman Catholic Catechism, neither side of the debate will agree to that (even though it is a great idea). The Catechism deals extensively with God's Plan for Human Sexuality.

I linked the answer to one of your questions. Catholic Answers has lots of articles on that question.

LINK

There's also many articles and extensive analysis of your question about the Bible.

Your two questions about Catholics and Protestants going to Heaven are answered directly in the Catechism and Catholic Answers.
This post was edited on 5/20/24 at 9:04 am
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49922 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 11:14 pm to
Not my pope
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
11146 posts
Posted on 5/19/24 at 11:45 pm to
I hate commie popes.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
16310 posts
Posted on 5/20/24 at 1:31 am to
Pope is a globalist puppet. Most of what he says...is meant to either prop up globalist views or tear down views that may hinder globalism.


He has long since stopped believing in the religion he's the pope of...and is only using his position to coax the believers into accepting other ideologies.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram