- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let's talk Browsers...
Posted on 9/11/15 at 10:43 am
Posted on 9/11/15 at 10:43 am
With Google Chrome shitting the bed recently with SSL, what does everyone use?
I started using Opera for the past week or so and I really like it. I've gone through IE, Edge, FireFox, and now Chrome. One day they will make a browser that does it all!
I started using Opera for the past week or so and I really like it. I've gone through IE, Edge, FireFox, and now Chrome. One day they will make a browser that does it all!
Posted on 9/11/15 at 11:10 am to 9th Green At 9
quote:Got a link? I haven't heard anything.
With Google Chrome shitting the bed recently with SSL
Posted on 9/11/15 at 11:18 am to 9th Green At 9
Chrome on PC. That new MS 10 deal on tablet.
Posted on 9/11/15 at 11:24 am to Korkstand
I wonder if he's talking about this.
LINK
Although that seems more like sites and ssl certificiate suppliers dropping the ball. I know I got warned about a year in advance to reinstall some certs that needed upgrading. If I don't upgrade them I wouldn't blame the browsers when it breaks.
quote:
Chrome 45, Firefox 40 and Opera 30 have all started to block HTTPS connections to servers using 512-bit Diffie-Hellman key exchange. The reason is that back in May a group of computer scientists discovered an attack that makes any TLS connection downgrade to 512 bits which can then be cracked in a reasonable time. LOGJAM - Can The NSA Break 1024-bit DHM Keys?
Put simply, a 512-bit key is not secure against a serious attack. At the moment it is estimated that it would take a 24-core machine 90 seconds to crack such a key. Moving up to 1024 bits changes the problem to something that needs 45M core years - which is supposed to be within the reach of state agencies.
As a response Google, Mozilla and Opera have modified their browsers to detect when 512-bit key TLS connections are possible with a server. However, and this is where the problems begin, rather than simply warning the user, all three browsers simply refuse to go any further until the problem is corrected on the server.
LINK
Although that seems more like sites and ssl certificiate suppliers dropping the ball. I know I got warned about a year in advance to reinstall some certs that needed upgrading. If I don't upgrade them I wouldn't blame the browsers when it breaks.
This post was edited on 9/11/15 at 11:25 am
Posted on 9/11/15 at 1:26 pm to 9th Green At 9
quote:
Let's talk Brazzers...
What my eyes saw.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 3:53 am to 9th Green At 9
Comodo IceDraggon
I also use Chromium. Chrome without all the Google crap.
I also use Chromium. Chrome without all the Google crap.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 5:41 am to TigerinATL
quote:
Although that seems more like sites and ssl certificiate suppliers dropping the ball. I know I got warned about a year in advance to reinstall some certs that needed upgrading. If I don't upgrade them I wouldn't blame the browsers when it breaks.
Agreed - I actually applaud Google for that. Better levels of security are good for all, even if forced.
Posted on 9/12/15 at 11:19 pm to 9th Green At 9
I use 3, and consistently run multiple tabs....avg 130 tabs on firefox. not kidding.
firefox...really love the layout
ice dragon
ie
firefox...really love the layout
ice dragon
ie
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News