- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: THE Manchester Derby thread - temporary ballooning United bandwagon edition
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:39 pm to droman225
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:39 pm to droman225
quote:
Nah not really. Their fans mirror cowboys and Yankees fans very much. Full of themselves, douches, think they are the greatest thing since sliced bread and everyone should bow down in their presence.
yes the American fan base represents United. Coming from a city fan this is rich b/c city's English fan base is utter shite.
quote:
All I'm saying is if united had only won one or two titles in history, they wouldn't be near as big as they are.
I'm not sure why that upsets you so much. It's a compliment really
Just keep proving you don't know shite. Even Bhoy shat on you comparing United with Arsenal and Chelsea. You don't know shite about soccer out side the MLS and you are looking foolish.
1
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:44 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
yes the American fan base represents United. Coming from a city fan this is rich b/c city's English fan base is utter shite.
But I live in America and only interact with Americans sooooo that's what I speak on
quote:
Just keep proving you don't know shite. Even Bhoy shat on you comparing United with Arsenal and Chelsea. You don't know shite about soccer out side the MLS and you are looking foolish.
quote:
They would be no bigger than the evertons and tottenhams of the EPL. Supported well. But not a global brand like Liverpool, arsenal, and Chelsea.
This was my statement. Are Liverpool arsenal and Chelsea not global brands?
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:49 pm to droman225
quote:
But I live in America and only interact with Americans sooooo that's what I speak on
Proving you don't know shite
quote:
This was my statement. Are Liverpool arsenal and Chelsea not global brands?
also proving you are clueless
If united only had half the titles they would be more successful than Chelsea or Arsenal. Before SAF they were a bigger club than both but in your dumb arse mind they would not be at either clubs level
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:51 pm to droman225
quote:
Sorry I don't suck uniteds dick, like their fans expect everyone to
I don't care if you hate United. Most people do, and that is fantastic. You just suck as a poster. 98 percent of the stuff you have put in this thread is complete BS you're just making up as you go along. Stick to the Dynamo, you're half as annoying when you drone about them.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 11:55 pm
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:52 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
If united only had half the titles they would be more successful than Chelsea or Arsenal. Before SAF they were a bigger club than both but in your dumb arse mind they would not be at either clubs level
Right. But nobody said half the tiles. I said one or two.
Let me ask you this. How many teams in the world have only won one or two titles and have even close to the support of united?
United has the support they do because of their success. Congrats on your favorite club being good (in history)
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 11:53 pm
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:53 pm to droman225
quote:
Are Liverpool arsenal and Chelsea not global brands?
How would you know? You only interact with Americans and make sweeping generalizations based on the American fans you know.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:56 pm to droman225
quote:
Right. But nobody said half the tiles. I said one or two.
With as many titles as Arsenal or Chelsea they would still be bigger. Keep ignoring that Manchester used to be a massive city, same with Liverpool.
quote:
United has the support they do because of their success. Congrats on your favorite club being good (in history)
Holy frick you really don't know shite about soccer. The more you post the more clear it gets.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:56 pm to WarSlamEagle
I still don't understand why y'all are so angry. I am saying united is so well supported because of their success.
Why does that offend you so much?
Why does that offend you so much?
Posted on 3/26/14 at 11:57 pm to StraightCashHomey21
You ignored my question
And London isn't?
quote:
With as many titles as Arsenal or Chelsea they would still be bigger. Keep ignoring that Manchester used to be a massive city, same with Liverpool.
And London isn't?
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 11:58 pm
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:00 am to droman225
The premise of this whole argument you had with SCH is completely stupid. We are American fans of a club nowhere near us. We are bandwagoners, or we are trying to be so anti-bandwagon that we support a largely unsuccessful team.
And of course United wouldn't be a global success if they didn't win titles when the game truly went global. But when you say United would be definitely smaller than Arsenal or Chelsea or Liverpool if they had their number of titles is ridiculous. I don't see how you tried to get under people's skin with this thing, but you did, so congratulations! You win.
And of course United wouldn't be a global success if they didn't win titles when the game truly went global. But when you say United would be definitely smaller than Arsenal or Chelsea or Liverpool if they had their number of titles is ridiculous. I don't see how you tried to get under people's skin with this thing, but you did, so congratulations! You win.
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 12:05 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:01 am to droman225
quote:
And London isn't?
Do some fricking research about Manchester and Liverpool during their days.
London supports multiple big teams. Before the mass exodus of people from the NW of England and its shipping and other industry works. It was a thriving and massive area. Both cities basically supported one team each. Do the fricking math.
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 12:12 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:01 am to StraightCashHomey21
You are so angry
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:02 am to droman225
You so dumb/clueless/etc
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:03 am to WarSlamEagle
quote:
The premise of this whole argument you had with SCH is completely stupid. We are American fans of a club nowhere near us. We are bandwagoners, or we are trying to be so anti-bandwagon that we support a largely unsuccessful team.
That's been my whole point all along.
quote:
I'll be happy when we all admit we are all bandwagon fans
Pg. 4
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:04 am to droman225
quote:
And of course United wouldn't be a global success if they didn't win titles when the game truly went global. But when you say United would be definitely smaller than Arsenal or Chelsea or Liverpool if they had their number of titles is ridiculous. I don't see how you tried to get under people's skin with this thing, but you did, so congratulations! You win.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:06 am to droman225
I picked United to watch when I was a little kid because I loved playing with them on FIFA and my dad had a couple of their old jerseys. I'll be the first to admit I didn't have some lofty aspirations for picking United, but I was also in the second grade. I have developed a deep connection with my club after all these years, but, yes, I was an elementary school bandwagoner and IDGAF.
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 12:07 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:06 am to WarSlamEagle
His redic statements get shot down with facts in football history.
If you pick a club and will go to bat for them learn their history and learn their rivals history before you start talking shite.
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:11 am to StraightCashHomey21
I haven't done anything close to "talking shite". In fact I have done the complete opposite.
You, for some reason. Are just being a giant pussy about this
You, for some reason. Are just being a giant pussy about this
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 12:11 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:11 am to WarSlamEagle
I never said smaller than Chelsea, Liverpool, etc. I said same boat
This post was edited on 3/27/14 at 12:12 am
Posted on 3/27/14 at 12:14 am to droman225
quote:
I haven't done anything close to "talking shite". In fact I have done the complete opposite.
no you are right you are just sounding like a complete dumbass say shite like this
quote:
They would be no bigger than the evertons and tottenhams of the EPL
Saying the only team in a major city like Manchester would be on the same level as the 3rd team in London and the 2nd in Liverpool proves how out of touch/new you are to English soccer.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News