Started By
Message

re: The cost of $100 million

Posted on 4/1/16 at 12:14 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84849 posts
Posted on 4/1/16 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

I'm sure you're referring to pro/rel here, but the only thing you get for being poor is higher SuperDraft picks. Not a huge reward.



I'm not a "pro rel is a magic bullet that will fix everything" guy, but I also don't think you can apply how other American sports leagues operate to soccer, at least not if you want to be competitive globally.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 4/1/16 at 5:49 pm to
quote:

Not the Bundesliga


Which is run by the DFB. Which is the FA in Germany.

This guy and you don't seem to know a thing about youth development.

In 1988, France reorganized its youth structure. Instead of the German model, where the clubs were incentivized, it circumvented the clubs entirely and created 13 centers of excellence around the country. The best one, Clairefontaine, is among the best youth academies in the world, and its graduates made up the back bone of France's golden generation.

This author's idea for a team to operate outside the league structure is utterly idiotic in terms of youth development. You don't even need a professional team to develop youth. The IMG academy in Florida is the most successful American soccer academy, and it doesn't have a corresponding professional team. The key is to get kids in early by identifying talent and paying for coaches.

Regardless, we would need many orders of magnitude more money in this country to make it work. At the minimum we would need 100 m a year for the next decade. I don't see that type of money in US soccer.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram