- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Did You See Vancouver's Masato Kudo Get Destroyed By Chicago's GK?
Posted on 5/23/16 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 5/23/16 at 4:59 pm
4
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:19 pm to John Keating
Jesus that looked pretty flagrant
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:45 pm to John Keating
pretty smart on the players part to get him on his side as fast as possible
This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:55 pm to WinnPtiger
Holy shite
Also pretty dangerous to move him, given the angle and force of that hit.
Also pretty dangerous to move him, given the angle and force of that hit.
Posted on 5/23/16 at 7:56 pm to DByrd2
true. with blood coming out of his mouth that fast, it's damned if you do damned if you don't
Posted on 5/23/16 at 9:58 pm to WinnPtiger
Yes, the Chicago player said that he was afraid Kudo would choke on his own blood and that he also heard gurgling which made him concerned that Kudo might be choking on his own regurgitation. His first instinct was to clear his airway which is why you see him opening Kudo's mouth with his fingers.
Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:02 pm to John Keating
Airway is always the first thing you address.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:05 am to John Keating
I saw that live. It was pretty nasty. Looks like it was even worse than a broken jaw. He was just starting to have a really good season too. Shame.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 6:52 am to John Keating
All WFC all the time?
Posted on 5/24/16 at 11:51 am to dagrippa
That wasn't flagrant for fricks sake ... its actually great goalkeeping.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 12:26 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Yea, that was definitely intentional.
Maybe not to hurt him like that but he definitely meant to send a get off me message and put something extra into that.
Maybe not to hurt him like that but he definitely meant to send a get off me message and put something extra into that.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 5/24/16 at 1:14 pm to RandySavage
quote:
Yea, that was definitely intentional.
Not at all. Fifty-fifty ball, goalkeeper was just trying to get there first and protect himself. Both players were at top speed.
Unfortunate injury, and certainly wish him all the best, but excellent goalkeeping.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:16 pm to PeepleHeppinBidness
This board is bizarro world sometimes I swear. He has the ball secured two feet on the ground and then jumps up shoulder first into the oncoming player.
Again, I don't think for a second he meant to hurt him like that but the intensity of the contact was without debate intentional.
He could have easily caught that ball and gone low like goalkeepers do 99% of the time when receiving the ball.
Again, I don't think for a second he meant to hurt him like that but the intensity of the contact was without debate intentional.
He could have easily caught that ball and gone low like goalkeepers do 99% of the time when receiving the ball.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:23 pm to RandySavage
Nah, the only thing bizarro is you.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:25 pm to RandySavage
Yeah and thats what GKs are trained to do. Most of the time they are collecting crosses in crowds of 10+ people. You train to win the ball, while protecting yourself AND delivering a blow so players are less likely to challenge you again.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 2:27 pm to RandySavage
quote:
He could have easily caught that ball and gone low like goalkeepers do 99% of the time when receiving the ball.
You are absolutely clueless.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 3:59 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
This may be the first time I've seen someone agree with a poster and call them clueless at the same time.
This post was edited on 5/24/16 at 4:03 pm
Posted on 5/24/16 at 4:28 pm to RandySavage
I didn't agree with you ... you called it both flagrant and intentional.
It's neither ... its trained. It's a part of the position.
He didn't decide to smash a kid ... its what ALL goalkeepers - at a high level - are trained to do.
Its intentional in that its trained - its not in that he was trying to "attack" a player.
It's neither ... its trained. It's a part of the position.
He didn't decide to smash a kid ... its what ALL goalkeepers - at a high level - are trained to do.
Its intentional in that its trained - its not in that he was trying to "attack" a player.
Posted on 5/24/16 at 4:36 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
I think he could have done more to avoid the collision, but should he have? Should he potentially injure himself or lose the ball trying to get out of the way of a player who decided to charge head on towards him?
Posted on 5/24/16 at 4:37 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Read my first post again, it says essentially the exact same thing you are saying.
Also, I've watched a lot of soccer and seen that scenario a million times and the keeper virtually always goes low, this keeper had the chance to do the same.
Also, I've watched a lot of soccer and seen that scenario a million times and the keeper virtually always goes low, this keeper had the chance to do the same.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News