- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2015/16 Kit Thread
Posted on 7/16/15 at 10:33 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 7/16/15 at 10:33 am to StraightCashHomey21
Better than that Chevy bow tie
Posted on 7/16/15 at 11:00 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Better than that Chevy bow tie
That and those 3 stripes on every fricking thing Adidas makes.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 11:06 am to GeauxColonels
quote:
Adidas
is Spanish for "second rate sponsor".
Posted on 7/16/15 at 11:17 am to StraightCashHomey21
What is Oscar doing? Did he just get done sting fried chicken or something?
Posted on 7/16/15 at 11:17 am to Riseupfromtherubble
quote:
Better than that Chevy bow tie
The Manc kits have been super shite for as long as I remember.
Can't remember a legit one in a long time. Maybe when they brought back that retro tie action? Or am I making that up?
Posted on 7/16/15 at 11:50 am to STLhog
ICT
Kilmarnock Home
Away
Inter
Santos Home
Away
3rd
Kilmarnock Home
Away
Inter
Santos Home
Away
3rd
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:08 pm to STLhog
quote:
The Manc kits have been super shite for as long as I remember.
City's kits since Nike have taken over, especially their home ones, have been fire. It obviously depends on whether or not you prefer Nike's simplicity when it comes to their designing though. I love how it's simple with the only other color's besides the sky blue coming on the collars.
I also have been a fan of the Nike volt color and will be pretty excited if City use that as their third kit this season.
Also, it's a known fact that Nike is superior to every other brand when it comes to merchandising and performance. They don't sweep everything for no reason.
I.E. The college football playoff was all nike sponsored teams this last year and both teams in the UCL this past year were Nike sponsored teams. The best wear Nike. It's that simple (Except in golf....UA having a pretty big year in that department).
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:12 pm to McCaigBro69
Nike's moving away from the sport.
And they did a horrible job with Celtic the last few years bar a couple kits.
And they did a horrible job with Celtic the last few years bar a couple kits.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:15 pm to TN Bhoy
quote:
Nike's moving away from the sport.
I honestly don't know anything about this, but what makes you imply it? Where has that been said or mentioned?
Like I said, I have no clue, I'm just curious.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:19 pm to McCaigBro69
The Bradford kits on the previous page are beautiful.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:22 pm to jackwoods4
Those Santos kits are clean.
This post was edited on 7/16/15 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:36 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
I honestly don't know anything about this, but what makes you imply it? Where has that been said or mentioned?
If they're not giving their fullest effort for Celtic, I think the writing is on the wall
Posted on 7/16/15 at 12:36 pm to McCaigBro69
They've mentioned it themselves a couple of times and they've drastically cut back on the number of kit deals.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:12 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
is Spanish for "second rate sponsor".
Compared to who ?
Let's see Real Madrid, Juve, Manchester United, FC Bayern, Chelsea and Milan.
This post was edited on 7/16/15 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:15 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
Also, it's a known fact that Nike is superior to every other brand when it comes to merchandising and performance. They don't sweep everything for no reason.
Just bc you make it up in your head doesn't make it true.
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:20 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Let's see Real Madrid, Juve, Manchester United, FC Bayern, Chelsea and Milan.
How many of those teams won the tournament that decides the best club in Europe last year? Nike sponsors the best. That's all I'm saying.
quote:
Just bc you make it up in your head doesn't make it true.
So you're saying that every team in the CFB playoff or the two teams who played in the UCL last year didn't wear Nike? I mean that isn't just a coincidence. They know who to sponsor and who to not.
Every other team is just a money thing. They know how much United's sponsorship was worth and when Adidas decided to pay out the arse for a team that's looked out of sorts the last couple of years Nike decided to let it go. They're the biggest sports retail company in the world for a reason. Because they're stuff is an elite product.
This post was edited on 7/16/15 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:29 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
How many of those teams won the tournament that decides the best club in Europe last year? Nike sponsors the best. That's all I'm saying.
2015: Barcelona-Nike
2014: Real Madrid- Adidas
2013: Bayern Munich- Adidas
2012: Chelsea- Adidas
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:32 pm to McCaigBro69
Just think about what you are saying it makes no sense, i know you want to prop Nike up bc City makes their kits but you are sounding foolish.
Madrid won it last year ffs
wtf that does not make them a better team. Juve is going to Adidas anyway.
Bc Nike pays them the most it does not make it a better product.
what are you talking about, United decided not to re up Nike not the other way around.
Actually their revenue is almost the same as Adidas 25 million dollars last time it was published to 14.5 Million Euro in 2013 when the exchange rate was roughly 1 euro equals $1.45
Adidas makes better soccer stuff.
quote:
How many of those teams won the tournament that decides the best club in Europe last year? Nike sponsors the best. That's all I'm saying.
Madrid won it last year ffs
quote:
So you're saying that every team in the CFB playoff or the two teams who played in the UCL last year didn't wear Nike? I mean that isn't just a coincidence. They know who to sponsor and who to not.
wtf that does not make them a better team. Juve is going to Adidas anyway.
quote:
So you're saying that every team in the CFB playoff or the two teams who played in the UCL last year didn't wear Nike? I mean that isn't just a coincidence. They know who to sponsor and who to not.
Bc Nike pays them the most it does not make it a better product.
quote:
They know how much United's sponsorship was worth and when Adidas decided to pay out the arse for a team that's looked out of sorts the last couple of years Nike decided to let it go.
what are you talking about, United decided not to re up Nike not the other way around.
quote:
They're the biggest sports retail company in the world for a reason. Because they're stuff is an elite product.
Actually their revenue is almost the same as Adidas 25 million dollars last time it was published to 14.5 Million Euro in 2013 when the exchange rate was roughly 1 euro equals $1.45
Adidas makes better soccer stuff.
This post was edited on 7/16/15 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:32 pm to jackwoods4
quote:
2015: Barcelona-Nike
2014: Real Madrid- Adidas
2013: Bayern Munich- Adidas
2012: Chelsea- Adidas
booom???
Posted on 7/16/15 at 1:37 pm to STLhog
quote:
The Manc kits have been super shite for as long as I remember.
you must have a shite memory
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News