- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would a jury of her peers actually convict Hillary?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:02 pm
I say neither a prosecutor nor Hillary can get an impartial jury. Thoughts?
13
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:03 pm to HubbaBubba
She'd likely opt for a judge trial
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:05 pm to John McClane
What court would hear the case?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:05 pm to John McClane
quote:
She'd likely opt for a judge trial
And then have that judge "Fostered."
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:08 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
Would a jury of her peers actually convict Hillary?
Where are you gonna find a dozen like this?
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:08 pm to HubbaBubba
If I can do it via video-conference setting, I'll serve on jury. Just give me lunch breaks and will do for nothing.
Unbiased peer.
Unbiased peer.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:10 pm to larry289
Funny shite that it would ever come to her being on trial. She needs to be punched in the count though.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:11 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
jury of her peers
Spawns of Satan, soulless witches, sith lords... I agree, they wouldn't be impartial.
A jury of humans, maybe, but the constitution does say peers.
Godfather beat me... oh well. Stronger Together!
This post was edited on 5/9/17 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:11 pm to HubbaBubba
You mean a pit of vipers?
This post was edited on 5/9/17 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:12 pm to HubbaBubba
Felons cannot register to vote.
So her peers aren't likely to be called for jury duty service.
So her peers aren't likely to be called for jury duty service.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:15 pm to HubbaBubba
Most of them are dead..
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:20 pm to HubbaBubba
The
Queen has not a peer.
Queen has not a peer.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:44 pm to larry289
quote:
If I can do it via video-conference setting, I'll serve on jury. Just give me lunch breaks and will do for nothing
Hell, I'll pay on my own accord to be a juror. I promise to be unbiased.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:45 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
her peers
Ewwwww
Posted on 5/9/17 at 10:53 pm to HubbaBubba
It would be worth it just to compile a jury of regular schmos and force her to recognize them as her "peers," conviction or not.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:06 pm to blueboy
You would have to get her peers out of prison and then we'll see.
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:07 pm to HubbaBubba
I would shite my pants if put on that jury
Posted on 5/9/17 at 11:12 pm to HubbaBubba
I'd be happy if they could convince her to plea it down to 3000 hrs cleaning the side of the road as long as they actually make her clean it.
To answer the question, obviously she couldn't get an impartial jury trial, but not many people actually get impartial juries.
To answer the question, obviously she couldn't get an impartial jury trial, but not many people actually get impartial juries.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 1:07 am to HubbaBubba
I don't see it ever going to trial.
Rich,Female,Democrat.And the fact that HRC has skated above the Law her entire Political career.
The OJ factor x 10.
Rich,Female,Democrat.And the fact that HRC has skated above the Law her entire Political career.
The OJ factor x 10.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News