Started By
Message

re: When is Tucker Carlson going to invite someone worth a damn on his show?

Posted on 12/7/16 at 8:21 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 8:21 pm to
I mean, he's better than any liberal he's had on so far. He's clever enough to have a retort that isn't instantly destroyed by common sense. He's just having on mouth breathers. At least put on someone who can put up a fight.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Damn, son. Tucker pissed you off. I bet you really want to debate him, huh?


He's pissing me off because he's not doing shite, but the dumbest among us (appropriately this board) are just eating it up because it makes them feel smart. That's it. It's all feelings and not facts.

He is not giving liberals who have actual facts a platform. He's a bottom feeder and a fraud from what he's given me so far, and you clowns are falling for it. He is simply a snake oil salesman with an incredibly biased point that he won't allow to be disputed by anyone of authority or intelligence.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23141 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

Jon Stewart on his show to prove

You've never seen the famous tucker Stewart argument from crossfire?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23141 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Jon Stewart already destroyed Tucker once on Crossfire. No way he has the balls to invite him on his show again.


Oh lawd someone is detached from reality.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
27877 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

Jon Stewart already destroyed Tucker once on Crossfire. No way he has the balls to invite him on his show again.

Youre definition of destroy is somewhat askew. On that show he 'destroyed' him by:

1) Al Sharpton was the most impressive Dem running for prez in '04
2) That they cant hold him to a journalistic standard because hes just a comedian
3) That Tucker is too old to wear bowties (WTF? Jon is the fasion police too?)
4) Accused them of being theater, and partisan hacks (proving he missed the whole point of Crossfire, Left vs Right)
5) Literally begged them not to go to commercial
6) Said Mr T should run for prez
7) Called Tucker a Big dick, proving that he had gotten under Jons skin
8) And basically blew his entire argument for the night, in response to a female audience members question

After rewatching it, I think he was high

LINK
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:05 pm to
quote:


Comedians tend to be pretty sharp and not let any bullshite slide by them, so yeah. Get a comedian on who knows what they're talking about.


hahahahahahahahahahah

You young shitheads really do use a comedy show as your primary news source
Posted by Knight of Old
New Hampshire
Member since Jul 2007
10965 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:15 pm to
Regarding 'fish in a barrel':

The sad truth is that the folks he has on who are in opposition (and folks like them) aren't really even capable of understanding his POV or his arguments.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
20963 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:29 pm to
I am just unsure how someone can watch John Stewart or Oliver and think they can hold their own in a real political debate. Smartassness is a sure sign of insecurity in one's position.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15350 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

OMLandshark
Why don't you give it a shot.

It would be hilarious watching him make you cry like a little girl.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
29139 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:39 pm to
Jesus I just watched the crossfire video and john didn't destroy them, what are you guys talking about? He came off as a smug a-hole who never once answered a single question. He was criticizing them, but had the wall built up of no no I'm a comedian so whatever I say or do doesn't count. It was a debate and John didn't debate. He just criticized, and never once made a point about anything.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15350 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Sentrius
So the 15 year veteran of Congress he eviscerated as his 2nd guest tonight doesn't qualify either?
Posted by Caplewood
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2010
39156 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 10:45 pm to
fricking hell could Jon Stewart have been anymore of a condescending Jewish elitist a-hole there? What a fricking cocksucker

quote:

Jesus I just watched the crossfire video and john didn't destroy them, what are you guys talking about? He came off as a smug a-hole who never once answered a single question. He was criticizing them, but had the wall built up of no no I'm a comedian so whatever I say or do doesn't count. It was a debate and John didn't debate. He just criticized, and never once made a point about anything.


100% this
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 10:48 pm
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 11:09 pm to
Just recently he had the public editor of the New York Times, he's had journalists, congressmen and activists

He finds something stupid someone has said that has gotten some attention and brings them on. Surprise surprise, the people who said stupid things...are stupid

And he has an eye on campus snowflakes. It's something that has been getting a lot of traction the last couple of years and people find it pretty shocking
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:04 am to
quote:

I am just unsure how someone can watch John Stewart or Oliver and think they can hold their own in a real political debate. Smartassness is a sure sign of insecurity in one's position.



O'Reilly regularly had town hall debates with Stewart. I think they both knew the value in this and saw each other as equals. Stewart can hold his own, and O'Reilly would be the first to tell you that.
This post was edited on 12/8/16 at 12:09 am
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112553 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:10 am to
Tucker Carlson probably has a solid 15-20 IQ points on either.
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 12:51 am to
quote:

Granted he brought on two Republicans who voted for Hillary


Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47715 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 3:09 am to
quote:

Stewart
He's better than some hacks but like all liberals when backed into a corner reverts to the elitist I know what's better for you than you do. He reverts to the I'm just a comedian name calling very few facts to back his argument. I will say he is better than Samantha Bee. I would love to see Tucker eviscerate that pompous know nothing twat. I hate that bitch with every fiber of my being.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47715 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 3:23 am to
quote:

Bill Maher
would be a debate of smug strawmen after smug strawmen. Maher thinks he is always the smartest guy in the room but rarely ends a debate with a fact just a pre-rehearsed snarky quip.

quote:

Adam Carolla


He's pretty damn conservative right? Probably be like the discussion he had with Rowe.

quote:

John Oliver
British Nancy boy that hates most of our constitution and anything to do with being a man. He is a 45 year old Brit SJW. He brings nothing of substance to the table.

quote:

Bill Burr
He hates all politicians and pretty much gives zero fricks. It would be funny as frick though. Burr is awesome. He might win because Tucker would probably be too busy laughing his arse off.

quote:

Joe Rogan
Not to up on his political leanings. Strikes me as a Libertarian type, might be just because I know he supports drug legalization and hates the hypocrisy of the war on drugs. Other than that don't know much about his school of thought.

quote:

Doug Stanhope
Would be so high he couldn't hold a thought. The entire debate would be one long beep because his vocabulary consist mainly of the words pussy, dick, and frick.

quote:

Stephen Colbert
A lesser version of John Stewart. Colbert would get emotional at the first sign he was losing (he showed this on election night) I think he would go down hard and revert to name calling and invoking Trump is Hitler shite like a snowflake.

quote:

Lewis Black
Hates Everybody that is too extreme on both sides (At least my experience with his stand up) Thinks Sarah Palin is a tard but still wants to frick her I personally would like to just hear a conversation between the two. Black is older now so his views may have changed but he always seemed like a left leaning libertarian type.

quote:

David Cross
Legit fricking nutcase. He's a dyed in the wool communist/anarchist. I heard a lot of his stuff and his so called intelligence does not come through in his non straight up comedy stuff. He would go full bore emotional SJW and the debate would be over in about 2 minutes.
This post was edited on 12/8/16 at 3:26 am
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123779 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 4:58 am to
quote:

You're giving me someone who is nameless


Adam Schiff is nameless?
He is the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee.

Tucker tore him up.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25397 posts
Posted on 12/8/16 at 5:28 am to
quote:

Adam Schiff is nameless?
He is the ranking member on the House Intelligence Committee.

Tucker tore him up.


That was brutal. Terrifying he has that position. The best part is told Carlson he should move to RT and was carrying water for Kremlin, but let's not resort to insults

Liberals are fricking moon bats.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram