- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What if ACB votes to KEEP the ACA
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:36 pm
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:36 pm
Once she’s confirmed. I hope to god she doesn’t, but what if she stands with the libs. Will the pos senators apologize? Does she have a documented statement on the ACA?
14
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:37 pm to gsvar2004
If there is legitimate legal standing for the ruling, then okay.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:37 pm to gsvar2004
Obamacare is about #350 on my list of current concerns.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:40 pm to gsvar2004
ACA, in SOME form, is assuredly gonna hang around...rather than an outright repeal, I think they're going to tweak it and add to it and cut from it...I doubt it will be fully be eliminated.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:41 pm to LCA131
quote:
ACA, in SOME form, is assuredly gonna hang around...rather than an outright repeal, I think they're going to tweak it and add to it and cut from it...I doubt it will be fully be eliminated.
this 100%
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:42 pm to LCA131
quote:
ACA, in SOME form, is assuredly gonna hang around...rather than an outright repeal, I think they're going to tweak it and add to it and cut from it...I doubt it will be fully be eliminated.
The COURT is not supposed to do that.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:42 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
Once she’s confirmed. I hope to god she doesn’t, but what if she stands with the libs. Will the pos senators apologize? Does she have a documented statement on the ACA?
this is all theater on the dems' part. they dont care about the aca or any of those photos they put up. its all about power and focus groups.
they literally have no soul or morals.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:43 pm to patnuh
It will depend on the aspect or argument that is being debated.
It's a concern of mine because my insurance went from $600 to $1600 month with a $7000 deductible for a family of 4.
But nothing can be worse than what the scum Roberts did to us and legitimized it instead of making Congress fix their error.
I think a lot of the fearmongering on ACA today by the Dems was to scare voters away from Trump, motivate their base, and also to hopefully influence ACB in her future decisions by bashing her with this.
It's a concern of mine because my insurance went from $600 to $1600 month with a $7000 deductible for a family of 4.
But nothing can be worse than what the scum Roberts did to us and legitimized it instead of making Congress fix their error.
I think a lot of the fearmongering on ACA today by the Dems was to scare voters away from Trump, motivate their base, and also to hopefully influence ACB in her future decisions by bashing her with this.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:43 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
Once she’s confirmed. I hope to god she doesn’t, but what if she stands with the libs. Will the pos senators apologize? Does she have a documented statement on the ACA?
she wrote a scholarly article critizing the decision. She called ACA, SCOTUScare. said Roberts pushed the ACA beyond its definition to uphold it.
article
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:43 pm to gsvar2004
Then we will keep it, that’s how government works. I guess we could go burn shite down and act like idiots!
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:44 pm to AMS
f yes she will vote to repeal if she gets a case for it just like roe v wade 
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:45 pm to gthog61
quote:
The COURT is not supposed to do that.
Correct.
If it is unconstitutional it's unconstitutional and gets struck plain and simple.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:55 pm to gthog61
quote:
The COURT is not supposed to do that.
Of course not. I never suggested it would be the court doing these things.
I'm not quite certain what the case is that's to come before the court shortly.
We'll see. She'll be confirmed... Worried about DJT...I HOPE it's unfounded fear...
Posted on 10/12/20 at 4:57 pm to gsvar2004
The ACA is poorly written law but it's not unconstitutional. So since ACB says she wants to uphold the constitution in the strictest sense, then she would presumably vote to not strike it down.
The only part of the law that is even questionable by constitutional rules are the mandates, and I think Congress correctly applied their power to tax. Even if it took some linguistic stretching to turn a penalty into a tax =)
The only part of the law that is even questionable by constitutional rules are the mandates, and I think Congress correctly applied their power to tax. Even if it took some linguistic stretching to turn a penalty into a tax =)
Posted on 10/12/20 at 5:03 pm to LSUFanHouston
she's a woman, so who knows how she'll vote.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 5:07 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
The ACA is poorly written law but it's not unconstitutional. So since ACB says she wants to uphold the constitution in the strictest sense, then she would presumably vote to not strike it down.
ACB disagrees. she says its unconstitutional and was only decided to be constitutional due to Roberts using excessive linguistic gymnastics. Presumably she would vote to strike an unconstitutionally written law down.
ETA - the individual mandate is currently decided to be unconstitutional, SC is hearing an appeal to that decision.
This post was edited on 10/12/20 at 5:09 pm
Posted on 10/12/20 at 5:16 pm to PsychTiger
quote:And there's not.
If there is legitimate legal standing for the ruling, then okay.
The only thing that made it law was the individual mandate. The individual mandate is unconstitutional.
It's gone. But it's probably going to still be around a very long time if we expect Congress to actually do their jobs and come up with a rational replacement for ACA.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 5:18 pm to gsvar2004
This isn’t how ACB does her job. She doesn’t vote for or against something. She will interpret the law, as it pertains to the case, and she will rule accordingly. There might very well be times when she rules in favor, and times when she rules against, the ACA.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 5:37 pm to Penrod
As long as the SC rules based on the Constitution, then I can't really be upset with whichever way they rule on cases. If the collective body interprets the ACA to be in line with the US Constitution, then so be it.
Posted on 10/12/20 at 5:39 pm to gsvar2004
quote:
Will the pos senators apologize? Does she have a documented statement on the ACA?
Supreme court justices are only as good as their last liberal ruling to the left.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News