- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
U.S. corporate CEOs are neglecting their fiduciary duty.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:52 am
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:52 am
Men in the workforce are paid 23% higher than women (according to what I heard on the radio...might be fake news).
Why are not U.S. corporate CEOs implementing corporate management policy to hire more women and reduce their costs of labor? Even if they capture a quarter of the 23% pay gap it's the CEO's fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to capture as much of that pay gap as possible and reduce the the costs of labor.
Why are not U.S. corporate CEOs implementing corporate management policy to hire more women and reduce their costs of labor? Even if they capture a quarter of the 23% pay gap it's the CEO's fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to capture as much of that pay gap as possible and reduce the the costs of labor.
5
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:53 am to GumboPot
quote:
Why are not U.S. corporate CEOs implementing corporate management policy to hire more women and reduce their costs of labor?
Bc cheaper labor doesn't necessarily equal saving money if the cheaper labor can't do the job.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:53 am to GumboPot
quote:
Why are not U.S. corporate CEOs implementing corporate management policy to hire more women and reduce their costs of labor? Even if they capture a quarter of the 23% pay gap it's the CEO's fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders to capture as much of that pay gap as possible and reduce the the costs of labor.
I ask this same question all the time. Either corporations are greedy users of people or they aren't. Either women are paid less then men or they aren't. It can't be both.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 7:56 am to GumboPot
You listen to Breitbart, LOL.
(so do I. I heard the same thing)
(so do I. I heard the same thing)
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:04 am to Bjorn Cyborg
It's more a rhetorical question to make the point that the pay gap exist more due to the fact that their are more men in jobs that are in higher demand.
Hell, I see it in the engineering field. College engineering programs are begging for women to get into the engineering field and when women do graduate as engineers they are the first hired and usually the highest paid (entry salary).
I saw it 20 years ago when I graduated in ME. There was one woman graduate out of 32 in my class and it wasn't from the college of engineering's lack of trying to get women into the field of engineering.
Hell, I see it in the engineering field. College engineering programs are begging for women to get into the engineering field and when women do graduate as engineers they are the first hired and usually the highest paid (entry salary).
I saw it 20 years ago when I graduated in ME. There was one woman graduate out of 32 in my class and it wasn't from the college of engineering's lack of trying to get women into the field of engineering.
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:29 am to GumboPot
quote:
Why are not U.S. corporate CEOs implementing corporate management policy to hire more women and reduce their costs of labor?
Is there a big pool of qualified women waiting to take these jobs?
Posted on 2/8/17 at 8:29 am to Wtodd
quote:
Bc cheaper labor doesn't necessarily equal saving money if the cheaper labor can't do the job.
:BOOM:
Posted on 2/8/17 at 9:09 am to GumboPot
They always gloss over the dancer community, where women far earn more than men. They just choose the facts they want
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News