Trump's J6 Judge Previously Expressed Anger Trump Was Still “Free” and Not Behind Bars

Unbiased judge, the lady with the scales of justice lost her blindfold somewhere

quote:

---

Thought her best quote to one of the defendants was “you didn’t come to the Capitol for love of country but rather for love of one man”. Absolute truth

---

Typical leftist telling people how they feel. Setting their own narratives.

quote:

---

This woman should not be a judge.

---

So an experience judge, confirmed unanimously by the Senate, with an outstanding reputation you have a problem with but a completely inexperienced judge in Florida who most think is unqualified and over her head is ok. Got it

quote:

---

Typical leftist telling people how they feel. Setting their own narratives.

---

Sounds like the truth is difficult for you to handle.

quote:

---

So you are a partisan.

---

Nah, partisan is being happy with a judge you feel leans toward your guy, judge in Florida, while whining like a little baby about a judge you feel doesn’t lean toward your guy.

quote:

---

So an experience judge, confirmed unanimously by the Senate, with an outstanding reputation you have a problem with but a completely inexperienced judge in Florida who most think is unqualified and over her head is ok. Got it

---

Experience and reputation are completely irrelevant to recusal. There are reasons the recusal rules exist. Sometimes judges have to recuse themselves regardless of how experienced they are. Has nothing to do with whether or not they could even make the right decision. They are required to recuse when a reasonable person thinks they may have bias against a criminal defendant.

What if her daughter was the criminal defendant? She still has the same experience and still was confirmed unanimously. Do you think she should recuse?

Here is the standard:

(a)Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b)He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances:
(1)Where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.

Suggesting in prior proceedings for J6 defendants that the entire episode was blind loyalty to one man who probably should be in jail is textbook grounds for recusal.

The only question is whether scotus steps in before trial or on appeal to slap down this judge for failure to recuse.

Keep dreaming

Well she is black, so …

Surely she will be impartial.

We are North Korea.