Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Trump/GOP should propose "The Dr. Jill Stein Vote Security Act of 2016"

Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:11 pm
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98745 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:11 pm
1) Applies to FEDERAL elections only (President, Senate, House);

2) Requires proof of citizenship to be eligible to/register to vote in federal elections

3) Requires ID to vote (state issued IDs will suffice) - federal funds (grants) will be furnished to states to provide financial assistance to those that cannot afford IDs

4) Very limited early voting period

5) No "day of" registration to vote

6) No provisional ballots

7) Mandatory updating of the voting rolls (including purging of rolls/cross-referencing with obituaries and SS death records) between every other election cycle - federal funds will be provided to states to offset the costs related to this

+++++++++++++++++++

This will bring the security and reliability that the good doctor is demanding.
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 5:20 pm
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34907 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:15 pm to
I'll kiss his....ring...if he runs with this. Long overdue.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13495 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:17 pm to
You the man! Thumbs up +.
Entertainment value only exceeded by real world need!
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45752 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

No provisional ballots
As a former election judge, I disagree with this point. Provisional ballots are there for a multiple of reasons. In Texas, a provisional ballot is placed on a machine reserved for this purpose.

The only time they are counted is if the provisional ballots exceed the difference between the winner and runner-up in any race, including local races and amendments or initiatives. Even then, the ballots are a different color, separated from all others. In addition, each of these ballots have to be signed for by the voter, the precinct judge and a witness. These are sealed in a unique enclosure using a numbered seal and this must be witnessed and signed for by the precinct judge and two witnesses attesting to the count of ballots matching the machine count.

If these are opened, each ballot has to be confirmed as a valid, legitimate ballot. This means address, precinct and signatures on file are inspected. If there is any doubt, these are set aside and not counted. A representative from both major parties is present as the seal is broken and the ballots examined.

Now, Texas takes a lot of care to insure fair elections, but I agree there are states where this can be abused if the state is lax in managing election integrity.
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9198 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:48 pm to
Only candiadate who can challenge a vote is person who has a viable chance of winning
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13495 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

Only candiadate who can challenge a vote is person who has a viable chance of winning

I actually encourage Jill's recounts. She is spending millions of libtard dollars that could have inflicted actual harm somewhere else. And the public butt hurt is just so entertaining.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79083 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 5:58 pm to
Tweet it to him He might even answer you
Posted by Hightide12
Member since Nov 2012
2730 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 6:01 pm to
You know it's coming! Can't wait.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98745 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 9:36 pm to
I don't tweet. Someone else can send it too him.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 12/5/16 at 9:42 pm to
Actually legislation that prevents sore loser candidates like Jill Stein who got less than 10% of the vote overall from being eligible to apply for a recount should be just as important.

She is no way aggrieved at all and there is zero chance she won any of the three states she is contesting at all. We need laws to prevent baseless and fruitless demands from fringe candidates like her causing chaos in our election system and throwing as much mud as she can at it.

She used the recounts to scam people for millions out of their own money to fund her party and that's a loophole that needs to be closed.
This post was edited on 12/5/16 at 9:44 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram