- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Travel ban heads to Supreme Court
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:09 am
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:09 am
12
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:17 am to hesterhamma
This is my number one issue - I hope that Kennedy, Gorsuch and Roberts man the frick up
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 5:18 am
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:38 am to hesterhamma
It's about time.
Tired of Judges coming out of no-where and over-turning decisions that have been made in our name.They're standing in the way of President Trump's mandate.
Tired of Judges coming out of no-where and over-turning decisions that have been made in our name.They're standing in the way of President Trump's mandate.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:41 am to hesterhamma
Can't wait to see Ginsberg, Kagan & co. tell us how "but for Trump's campaign rhetoric" the order would have been legal.
Ridiculous.
Ridiculous.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:42 am to TrueTiger
That really would have to be the case. Crazy.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:46 am to hesterhamma
I never take supreme court decisions as guarantees.
But if the court does rule in Trumps favor, the left may ACTUALLY melt
But if the court does rule in Trumps favor, the left may ACTUALLY melt
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:48 am to ShortyRob
I know frick all about the Supreme Court - is this actually going to be heard and decided within the next couple of months?
If so and if we win, the melt (on the heels of Paris) will exceed election itself
#StopIslam
If so and if we win, the melt (on the heels of Paris) will exceed election itself
#StopIslam
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 5:49 am
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:49 am to hesterhamma
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:55 am to hesterhamma
Morning Cuck just said he'd be shocked if Trumpy doesn't get 6 votes in favour.
Mark Halperin said only 5.
Both agree the lower courts are wrong in their rulings.
Mark Halperin said only 5.
Both agree the lower courts are wrong in their rulings.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 5:58 am to SirWinston
quote:
is this actually going to be heard and decided within the next couple of months?
Probably be October at the earliest.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 6:54 am to SirWinston
quote:
I hope that Kennedy, Gorsuch and Roberts man the frick up
I hope all 9 do; we need this to be unanimous.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 6:57 am to hesterhamma
This was inevitable and couldn't come fast enough.
Worst case scenario, a 5-4 win for the administration.
Hopefully some of the left wing justices do their fricking job and interpret the constitution as written and join the majority.
Worst case scenario, a 5-4 win for the administration.
Hopefully some of the left wing justices do their fricking job and interpret the constitution as written and join the majority.
This post was edited on 6/2/17 at 6:58 am
Posted on 6/2/17 at 6:59 am to SirWinston
quote:
hope that Kennedy, Gorsuch and Roberts man the frick up
It's written correctly and the writing in the document is ALL that the USSC will evaluate. It may possibly be a full majority if they do their job. They won't take into account some day a year ago when Trump said "Muslim instead of Islam, or vice versa
Posted on 6/2/17 at 7:04 am to Bigtime92
quote:
Probably be October at the earliest.
No chance at all they fast track it since it has direct national security implications?
Posted on 6/2/17 at 8:26 am to hesterhamma
bump, because this is important and is getting lost in the End of the World hysteria #ParisIsBurning
Posted on 6/2/17 at 8:33 am to Midget Death Squad
It won't be 9-0 but The Administration will win. The fact of the matter is Trump COULD have made it a Muslim ban and that is legal. The law is clear. The President may ban ANY group of immigrants if he feels they are detrimental to the US, and foreigners on foreign soil are simply not afforded protections by the COTUS.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 8:33 am to SirWinston
This is just a request for the SC to hear it. The SC can grant or deny that request. No guarantee they will near or decide this matter
Posted on 6/2/17 at 8:34 am to TigerFanatic99
The Court if it wants to punt can grant a stay of the injunction and then grant cert. by the time the case would be heard they can punt it on mootness.
Posted on 6/2/17 at 8:36 am to SirWinston
quote:
I hope that Kennedy, Gorsuch and Roberts man the frick up
And therein lays the problem. Roberts
Posted on 6/2/17 at 8:36 am to TheCurmudgeon
quote:
This is just a request for the SC to hear it. The SC can grant or deny that request. No guarantee they will near or decide this matter
There is zero chance the court denies cert on this. ZERO
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News