- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Transgender Kindergartner's rights
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:52 am to Revelator
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:52 am to Revelator
quote:
That's not an answer. How come the right always has to let it go?
Because we're just a bunch of unlightened homophobic hicks.
quote:
Why couldn't the gay couple in Colorado, the gays protesting Chick-fil-a, or the gays outraged over Phil Ribertson's remarks let it go?
They're more enlightened and smarter than we are.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:54 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
I have no idea the specific explanation for it, but it is very real and very powerful.
It's called "sin". And yes, it's very real and very powerful.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 10:59 am to Quidam65
quote:
It's called "sin". And yes, it's very real and very powerful.
So a 7 year old is "sinning" when he/she asserts her gender as the opposite?
Posted on 1/2/14 at 11:02 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
So a 7 year old is "sinning" when he/she asserts her gender as the opposite?
Is a 7 year old capable of deciding their gender? 7 year olds can barely be trusted to dress themselves, let alone decide if they should identify themselves as a "boy" or "girl"
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 11:02 am
Posted on 1/2/14 at 11:04 am to UGATiger26
quote:
Is a 7 year old capable of deciding their gender?
Yes, it would appear that they can have significant tendencies which they are willing to assert from a very early age in that regard.
quote:
7 year olds can barely be trusted to dress themselves
Doesn't sound like you have any 7 year olds. Barely trusted to dress themselves? A 7 year old can get up, make their bed, get dressed and get breakfast all for themselves.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 11:11 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Yes, it would appear that they can have significant tendencies which they are willing to assert from a very early age in that regard.
Yes, I'm sure there are tendencies. Are you willing to assert that there are no potential dangers in "endorsing" these tendencies and a 7-year-old male's decision to become a girl?
What makes a girl a "girl?" What makes a boy a "boy?"
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 11:12 am
Posted on 1/2/14 at 11:15 am to UGATiger26
quote:
Are you willing to assert that there are no potential dangers in "endorsing" these tendencies and a 7-year-old male's decision to become a girl?
Maybe, maybe not. In the single instance I have witnessed this first hand, it was basically totally obvious that it wasn't just a phase. The parents fought it for several years before realizing it just was what it was. Now that the child is nearing adulthood, I can say they are quite at ease with their decision to "endorse" the tendency rather than fight it.
quote:
What makes a girl a "girl?" What makes a boy a "boy?"
Very good question. The answers aren't nearly as easy as we have always assumed. Human gender and sexuality continues to reveal itself as highly complex and about the furthest thing from black and white as is possible.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 11:24 am to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Maybe, maybe not. In the single instance I have witnessed this first hand, it was basically totally obvious that it wasn't just a phase. The parents fought it for several years before realizing it just was what it was. Now that the child is nearing adulthood, I can say they are quite at ease with their decision to "endorse" the tendency rather than fight it.
I get you here, and though it is not my particular cup of tea, I understand that there are individuals who deal with this type of gender-identity issue.
However, my problem stems from the concern that there will be kids who are indeed just going through a phase who will have their behavior praised and normalized to the point where it could severely affect them later on. My brother, bless his soul, went through a phase when he was younger where he absolutely loved the troll dolls (those things with the crazy hair) and his favorite movie was my little pony and the purple ooze. Trust me when I say that the guy is straight as an arrow and was an all-county pitcher and fullback. He is in no way gender-confused. What would have happened if my parents noticed his tendencies when he was younger and started thinking "he seems to be drawn to girl toys. Maybe we should get him more because that's what he seems to be identifying as." Again, this goes back to what makes a boy a "boy" and a girl a "girl."
If parents and children want to entertain the confused gender issue, then I will wish them well and hope it works out for them. However, this law now makes it other people's problem. Try as I might, I cannot blame a father of a 14 year old girl for not wanting a "gender-confused" male to be in the bathroom with her.
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 11:25 am
Posted on 1/2/14 at 11:41 am to UGATiger26
quote:
My brother, bless his soul, went through a phase when he was younger where he absolutely loved the troll dolls (those things with the crazy hair) and his favorite movie was my little pony and the purple ooze. Trust me when I say that the guy is straight as an arrow and was an all-county pitcher and fullback. He is in no way gender-confused. What would have happened if my parents noticed his tendencies when he was younger and started thinking "he seems to be drawn to girl toys. Maybe we should get him more because that's what he seems to be identifying as." Again, this goes back to what makes a boy a "boy" and a girl a "girl."
No offense, but that example to me is just silly. The one I witnessed was extremely in excess of what you have described. The child relentlessly asserted that he believed he was a girl. It had nothing to do with playing with dolls. It had to do with - quite literally - the child behaving as and believing he was really a girl.
I would certainly not support sending kids to the other side's bathrooms just because they liked troll dolls.
quote:
If parents and children want to entertain the confused gender issue, then I will wish them well and hope it works out for them. However, this law now makes it other people's problem. Try as I might, I cannot blame a father of a 14 year old girl for not wanting a "gender-confused" male to be in the bathroom with her.
I can understand this. On a related note, when someone is gay, should they still be allowed to go into their sex's bathroom?
Posted on 1/2/14 at 12:04 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
No offense, but that example to me is just silly. The one I witnessed was extremely in excess of what you have described. The child relentlessly asserted that he believed he was a girl. It had nothing to do with playing with dolls. It had to do with - quite literally - the child behaving as and believing he was really a girl.
But who are you to say that? What if a parent(s) did see it that way? Where is the line drawn that if you cross it, you can now use the opposite sex's bathroom? You seem to have had experience with a case like this, but if we are dealing with dynamics as complex as you claim them to be, how can it possibly be so black-and-white?
Again, my issue with the law is now it makes it everyone's problem. Go read my post on page 2 and answer my questions about the parents and the teacher. That's not a challenge or anything. I'm just curious as to what your answers would be.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 12:09 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
On a related note, when someone is gay, should they still be allowed to go into their sex's bathroom?
Good question. Here's another one though.
If this law were to widen to incorporate restrooms in all public areas in California, how do females in the women's restroom know if a male who just walked in identifies as a woman? Do they just take it on good faith? Does the transgender person have to wear a badge?
Seriously, what's to stop a heterosexual male from walking into the women's restroom at a public museum and saying "it's cool. I'm a woman."
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 1/2/14 at 12:42 pm to UGATiger26
If liberals value science so much then why don't they accept the scientific fact that if you have a penis you're a male if you have a vagina you're female. Period.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 1:14 pm to UGATiger26
quote:
Well, it's bound to happen sooner or later....eventually along will come a 6-foot-5 male who identifies as female and wants to play on the girls b-ball team. It will be quite interesting to see how the players, fans, coaches, and parents of the opposing team feel about that. Even more interesting to see what happens when NCAA women's basketball recruiting season comes around. Will the NCAA be forced to allow males who identify as female to play on women's teams? What if universities refuse to offer him a women's basketball scholarship? Will we have a major civil right issue on our hands here?
Related question - Did anyone ever confirm that former Baylor standout and current WNBA star Britney Griner was, in fact, female and not a M2F trans?
Posted on 1/2/14 at 1:20 pm to teke184
quote:
Did anyone ever confirm that former Baylor standout and current WNBA star Britney Griner was, in fact, female and not a M2F trans?
Well, we know Griner refused to compete in the Olympics (where they test for that stuff), so ...
Posted on 1/2/14 at 1:58 pm to deltaland
quote:
why don't they accept the scientific fact that if you have a penis you're a male if you have a vagina you're female. Period.
Because the science on it is nowhere near that clear for 100% of the population. There are human beings at the margin that challenge the simplicity of these designations.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 1:58 pm to Big Scrub TX
Irony.
Largely the same people that will bash anyone who believes in any form of religion and ridicule them for going against "science" are the very same people who will ignore "science" when it comes to classifying the gender of a species...
Largely the same people that will bash anyone who believes in any form of religion and ridicule them for going against "science" are the very same people who will ignore "science" when it comes to classifying the gender of a species...
Posted on 1/2/14 at 2:00 pm to UGATiger26
quote:
So ummm what happens if the parents of 4 year old boy refuse to buy him dresses or attempt to dissuade him from playing with dolls? Would that be considered a form of child abuse or neglect? Can child protective services get involved?
It's hard to say. You should look up some of the research on this. I saw a good documentary awhile back that followed parents grappling with these questions. Abuse never seemed to enter the picture.
quote:
What about a teacher who overhears their female first-grader comment that her parents didn't get her teenage mutant ninja turtle action figures for Christmas? Is the teacher required to report that as a possible case of the girls transgender rights being violated? Is an investigation conducted?
I suppose you can imagine some slippery slope world where this would happen, but the current situation leaves me unworried about such a thing.
quote:
This is even better. Someone please tell me who the intellectual giants were who decided that boys and girls were segregated athletically because of cultural or social reasons instead of physiological ones.
I think you are merging 2 separate issues. The true cases of "transgender-ness" are pretty uncommon.
quote:
Well, it's bound to happen sooner or later....eventually along will come a 6-foot-5 male who identifies as female and wants to play on the girls b-ball team. It will be quite interesting to see how the players, fans, coaches, and parents of the opposing team feel about that. Even more interesting to see what happens when NCAA women's basketball recruiting season comes around. Will the NCAA be forced to allow males who identify as female to play on women's teams? What if universities refuse to offer him a women's basketball scholarship? Will we have a major civil right issue on our hands here?
Wasn't this question somewhat addressed in the Olympics with that South African gal?
Posted on 1/2/14 at 2:19 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Because the science on it is nowhere near that clear for 100% of the population. There are human beings at the margin that challenge the simplicity of these designations.
I am not an expert on the subject, but I believe you can have XX chromosome and be born with a penis, and XY and born without.
The human body is a complex and wonderful thing
and honestly I don't see why good christians wouldn't have sympathy for someone thinking they were of the opposite of their birth assigned sex. Can you imagine how hard that is? Its not like they believe this b.c society embraces this, they have to come a very hard decision.
This post was edited on 1/2/14 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 1/2/14 at 3:04 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
and honestly I don't see why good christians wouldn't have sympathy for someone thinking they were of the opposite of their birth assigned sex. Can you imagine how hard that is? Its not like they believe this b.c society embraces this, they have to come a very hard decision.
I agree. The vitriol saddens me.
Posted on 1/2/14 at 3:26 pm to Big Scrub TX
Gays accepted by Native Americans: Two Spirit People
This is an article about how the native Americans viewed gay/transgendered people as two spirited. They viewed them as enlightened in the way that they have the soul of a man and a woman, thus can relate to everyone in a different way than those born straight. It's amazing how the native Americans looked up to these people as teachers and religious leaders, then the European Christian influence viewed these people as sinners and evil. Luckily I think America has turned a corner and gay/transgendered people are being treated better, and becoming more understood as the years go by.
This is an article about how the native Americans viewed gay/transgendered people as two spirited. They viewed them as enlightened in the way that they have the soul of a man and a woman, thus can relate to everyone in a different way than those born straight. It's amazing how the native Americans looked up to these people as teachers and religious leaders, then the European Christian influence viewed these people as sinners and evil. Luckily I think America has turned a corner and gay/transgendered people are being treated better, and becoming more understood as the years go by.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News