- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Today we saw the largest number of faithless electors in over a century
Posted on 12/19/16 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 12/19/16 at 5:53 pm
I'm speaking of the FIVE faithless Democrat electors who voted for someone other than Hillary.
LINK
quote:
At least five Democrats who had been committed to back Hillary Clinton in the U.S. Electoral College cast ballots for other people on Monday, the largest number of "faithless electors" seen in well over a century.
The 538 electors were voting across the country to confirm Republican Donald Trump as the next president. The event is normally a formality but took on extra prominence this year after some Democrats urged electors to revolt and switch to Clinton, who won the national popular vote on Nov. 8.
In the end, it was not Republicans breaking ranks. The Democratic dissidents - four from Washington state and one from Maine - underscored deep divisions within their party and effectively dashed long-shot hopes by some activists that Republicans pledged to Trump might back Clinton.
By late afternoon, no Republican elector was reported to have cast a ballot for anyone other than Trump, although one elector from Texas had written that he planned to do so.
The move by the five was a rare break from the tradition - and in many states a legal requirement - of casting an Electoral College ballot as directed by the outcome of that state's popular election.
It appeared to be the largest number of electors not supporting their party's nominee since 1872, when 63 Democratic electors did not vote for party nominee Horace Greeley, who had died after the election but before the Electoral College convened, according to Fairvote.org. Republican Ulysses S. Grant had won re-election in a landslide.
LINK
Posted on 12/19/16 at 5:57 pm to Frank Black
And the Hillary supporters worried their whining would go unheard.
Oh ye of little faith
Oh ye of little faith
Posted on 12/19/16 at 5:58 pm to Frank Black
Despite them fukking over old baggy count, they still should be hung from the nearest tree. What's the point of voting then if they won't honor our vote?
Posted on 12/19/16 at 6:01 pm to Frank Black
While this is so deserved and ironic considering the push the dems made for republican electoral voters to turn, it is also disturbing in that it shows a blatant disregard / lack of faith for our system. Electoral college members voting for somebody not even on the ticket is disturbing to me
Posted on 12/19/16 at 6:04 pm to Frank Black
All democrats should be embarrassed. This is an embarrassing time for them.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News