Started By
Message
locked post

The following major journalists/pundits can NEVER be trusted again. (2018 tweets)

Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:37 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69264 posts
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:37 pm
1) Bradley Moss: "national security lawyer", often on Fox as a liberal voice. Works for lawfirm representing whistleblower




2) Ken Dilanian: NBC News senior correspondent



3) Jonathan Landay: Reuters senior NatSec correspondent



4) Will Wilkinson: senior NY opinion Writer:



5) Renatto Mariato: Chief CNN legal analyst



6) Jim Scuttio: CNN anchor



7) Natasha Bertrand: Politico NatSec journalist



8) Julia Ainsley: NBC news DOJ correspondent



9) Jennifer Rubin: "conservative" columnist at WAPO



10) Shane Harris: Senior WAPO NatSec reporter



thank you Techno_Fog for aggregating these 2018 and 2017 tweets that Horowitz debunked



Horowitz report:


Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98828 posts
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:38 pm to
Not reading all of that. I’ll just assume it’s “all of them”.
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15675 posts
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:43 pm to
quote:




Is this the new standard of truth?

"The witness did not perjure himself because parts of his testimony were confirmed."
Posted by Rooskie
MN
Member since Oct 2019
643 posts
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:45 pm to
I may say those tweets didn't age well.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62395 posts
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:49 pm to
Yeah, looks like McCabe was right when he said without the Dossier they would not have gotten the FISA approved, that it was the main thing they relied on....He was accurate and the media is FAKE news.......
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25953 posts
Posted on 12/10/19 at 10:55 pm to
Revoke their precious Blue Check marks immediately!
Posted by zunic
Dallas
Member since Nov 2014
921 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 12:11 am to
Almost none of those screenshots has anything to do with the last screenshot from the IG report.
Posted by zunic
Dallas
Member since Nov 2014
921 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 12:13 am to
quote:

Is this the new standard of truth?


Parts of it have been confirmed. I'm not sure where you are going with this other than exhibiting a lack of reading comprehension.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69264 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 12:16 am to
quote:

Almost none of those screenshots has anything to do with the last screenshot from the IG report.
What?

Nearly all those screenshots are journalists saying the dossier was not used to get a FISA

the ig report literally found that the fisa was the central and essential piece of evidence used.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69264 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Parts of it have been confirmed. I'm not sure where you are going with this other than exhibiting a lack of reading comprehension.


You have to be kidding me? You continue to believe the dossier is true? Holy shite, dude.

Did you even fricking read the IG report? Horowitz talked to MULTIPLE subsources of steele about the major accusations, and the subsources indicated that either steele made up/embellished what they actually said, or that they didn't actually have any info and were just BSing steele.
Posted by Pechon
unperson
Member since Oct 2011
7748 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 12:55 am to
quote:

You have to be kidding me? You continue to believe the dossier is true? Holy shite, dude.


Their feeble minds are broken. Remember the past couple years how Muller was going to get him? Remember how confident they were that ol Honest Bob was gonna save America from Bad Orange Man.

That turned out to be a dud.

Then the IG report comes out and the cause of the Muller investigation was based on a flimsy fake dossier that was used to get a warrant. It's over, it's done. It was a hoax all along and the left can't bring themselves to accept it just like they can't accept the results of the 2016 election.

In other words, President Trump broke them. You are finally seeing the scumbags for what they are.

Posted by Tesla
the Laurentian Abyss
Member since Dec 2011
7954 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 5:10 am to
quote:

by zunic



If I pay you $1, would you just not post 20 times? It’s the same rate you’re getting from CTR plus less work (which I know you value).
Posted by EastBankTiger
A little west of Hoover Dam
Member since Dec 2003
21317 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 5:20 am to
quote:

What do you say when you have got nothing to say?


His "go to" phrase is usually:

JOKE

HEAD.
Posted by dena
Member since Jul 2019
150 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 5:27 am to
Did all the people in the OP know they were telling lies, and tell them on purpose in order to deceive the American public, or were they fooled, duped, into believing the lies told by someone else the major media deemed credible?
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 5:28 am
Posted by bird35
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
12151 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 5:46 am to
Journalists today do not believe the propaganda they write.

They probably laugh about how untrue the last story was and challenge their coworkers to write a story more false.

These are the same people who WATCHED THE VIDEO OF THE COVINGTON STUDENTS AND WROTE HOW THE STUDENTS BULLIED THE POOR INDIAN.

Remember, HUNDREDS of journalists watched the video and lied to the people KNOWING the video would eventually come out.

They are not reporting news, they are trying to move America Left.
Posted by Possumslayer
Pascagoula
Member since Jan 2018
6203 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 6:22 am to
It’s like saying the sun rose this morning and I caught the worlds largest bass..... gotta be true the sun rose.
Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3450 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 7:10 am to
quote:

Parts of it have been confirmed. I'm not sure where you are going with this other than exhibiting a lack of reading comprehension

Which parts? Be specific, you fricking fraud
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
10342 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Parts of it have been confirmed. I'm not sure where you are going with this other than exhibiting a lack of reading comprehension.

Take this statement: “According to sources, poster ‘zunic’ has eaten lunch multiple times over the past week. Additionally, sources show he has pissed on male hookers in a hotel room.”

If we can confirm that you’ve eaten lunch within the past week, does that also mean you’ve pissed on male hookers in a hotel room, since “parts of it have been confirmed”?
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 7:16 am to
The list would a lot shorter if you listed the one(s) we could trust
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51489 posts
Posted on 12/11/19 at 7:31 am to
Twitter allows them to expose themselves. I just hope someone is posting all this on each of the feeds of those "journalists". Rub their noses in it like they are dogs who just shite in the house.
This post was edited on 12/11/19 at 7:32 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram