Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Taxpayers paid $162.5M for union work

Posted on 3/28/17 at 9:28 am
Posted by Quidam65
Q Continuum
Member since Jun 2010
19307 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 9:28 am
The article is a bit misleading as it only discusses what is called "official time".

Having been in FedGov for almost 30 years, let me clarify.

"Official time" is not limited to union officials doing solely union business. I agree with those on this board who take issue with that (and before becoming a manager, I was not only covered by a CBA but also a dues-paying member, and if I were to go back to a non-managerial position covered by the CBA I would once again join).

It also includes union-covered employees filing grievances (e.g. an employee filing a grievance believing that the supervisor provided an unfair annual appraisal) and the employee's and steward's time in attempting to settle the issue.

LINK
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 9:45 am to
Unions

For weak-willed, weak-minded simpletons that have no faith in their capacity to do job and draw fair compensation.

If someone only paid me $10 an hour to write code, I find a new contract or learn a trade that paid better.

Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 3/28/17 at 9:49 am to
quote:

and if I were to go back to a non-managerial position covered by the CBA I would once again join


You are calling out the union but if you had to do it over again you'd frick the tax payers as well?

WTF?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram