- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Synopsis of GA 2020 election fraud from Garland Favorito when pressed by the DNC lawyer
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:17 pm to hawkeye007
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:17 pm to hawkeye007
quote:
this shows just how bad the lawyers that trump hired to look into this.
I love that the fate of our Free Republic hinges on the attorney hiring ability of the people we elect. That's awesome, isn't it?
1
Posted on 5/13/24 at 4:25 pm to ChexMix
quote:
Dems stole the 2020 election from the American people and inserted their puppet, printed money, started wars, then emptied the treasury and robbed every tax payer.
Don't forget that they drained down the oil reserves too!
Posted on 5/13/24 at 5:42 pm to wareagle7298
quote:
why was none of this ever proved in court?
At this point if anyone asks the "in court" question I just have to assume they are retarded.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:06 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I love that the fate of our Free Republic hinges on the attorney hiring ability of the people we elect. That's awesome, isn't it?
As opposed to how many people the loser can call to the Capitol on the day the election is certified?
I prefer the lawyer/ court process to that.
This post was edited on 5/13/24 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:10 pm to ChexMix
quote:Best one line summary of the past 4 years.
Dems stole the 2020 election from the American people and inserted their puppet, printed money, started wars, then emptied the treasury and robbed every tax payer.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:18 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I prefer the lawyer/ court process to that.
Well when this fails because it's trash, you get the other.
See how it works?
Posted on 5/13/24 at 6:38 pm to Turbeauxdog
At least you can admit J6 was a naked power play. That’s progress 
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:01 pm to wareagle7298
quote:
I'm sure it was crooked as hell, but why was none of this ever proved in court?
What court would hear this?
There’s not a court in the United States that wants to investigate our voting system that’s held together by duct tape and baling twine.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 7:09 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
At least you can admit J6 was a naked power play. That’s progress
You're 100% correct, just not the way you think.
J6 was 100% preventable and was likely going to happen without an increase in law enforcement/National Guard troops that were offered by president Trump 3 days before J6. Pelosi and others in the Bureaucratic State knew J6 would play in their favor and dismissed Trump's offer for additional security, eventually the truth will stand and those who allowed J6 to happen will not only be fully exposed but will be required to explain themselves.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:03 pm to TigerB8
ronRick’s biggest blunder is not understanding the difference between evidence and proof
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:09 pm to wareagle7298
quote:
I'm sure it was crooked as hell, but why was none of this ever proved in court?
Latches, no-standing and anything the dem and coward judges could do to not consider the evidence. Trump won about half of the cases that were considered on the facts and merits.
The MSM would have you sniff the gaslight of DNC talking points though.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:16 pm to wareagle7298
quote:
I'm sure it was crooked as hell, but why was none of this ever proved in court?
The main reason was the fear of retaliation by the Marxist Dems. The judges and lawyers knew that even an objectively correct win that aided Trump in any case would bring relentless persecution, doxing and retaliation on themselves. Simply not worth the risk for most of them.
This type of legal environment only used to exist in third world totalitarian states. Now we have it here. Thanks Obama and friends!
Posted on 5/13/24 at 8:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
There’s not a court in the United States that wants to investigate our voting system that’s held together by duct tape and baling twine.
Not to mention if they were elected gaming the same system.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 9:02 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
As opposed to how many people the loser can call to the Capitol on the day the election is certified?
I’m not surprised that you and Pelosi see thing’s similarly.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 10:42 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
At least you can admit J6 was a naked power play. That’s progres
You don't reason well, I guess that's why you had to go to southern for law school.
Posted on 5/13/24 at 11:00 pm to Deplorableinohio
quote:
Do you have the cahones to risk your livelihood to support Trump and look into the steal? I think not. There’s a reason even a moron like you should understand why there are no prestigious Washington or New York law firms representing President Trump.
The list is not long. Mike Lindell. Peter Navarro, currently serving a four month sentence in federal prison for a misdemeanor which is under appeal, and not permitted visitations because he’s a high risk inmate. Steve Bannon. Same charges as Navarro, but not imprisoned pending appeal. Rudy Giuliani. Look what they did to General Michael Flynn.
This is lawfare.
Look at J6 inmates and those still in solitary confinement for three years without charges or a trial.
Get your head out of your *ss.
If it weren't for 57 men who signed their own death warrant (aka The Declaration of Independence) with as much or more to lose as those you describe, you would not be free to post what you did.
Think about that for a minute while you pull your head out of your arse.
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:11 am to wareagle7298
When the judges were allowed to decry No Standing, evidence was never presented, that is why.
Posted on 5/14/24 at 3:36 am to TigerB8
quote:
Independent investigators across the country were told "no standing" and many cases never made it into the courtroom
The courts came up with all manner of procedural tricks to avoid hearing the evidence.
"You should have filed before the election"
"No standing"
"Latches"
Posted on 5/14/24 at 7:38 am to wareagle7298
quote:
I'm sure it was crooked as hell, but why was none of this ever proved in court?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News