- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme's torching Colorado's lawyer....
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:17 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:17 am
Ouch...
Even liberal justices are basically telling Colorado to shut up and color, they don't get to decide who is going to be President.
Even liberal justices are basically telling Colorado to shut up and color, they don't get to decide who is going to be President.
8
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:18 am to Original Bayou Boy
Yep…I don’t fully trust it
But I’d be shocked at anything but 9-0
But I’d be shocked at anything but 9-0
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:18 am to Original Bayou Boy
Trump atty arguing before that Confederate insurrectionists were elected to office, so Trump should be able to run for re-election, even if he is “a self-admitted insurrectionist.” 
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:19 am to cbtullis
quote:
But I’d be shocked at anything but 9-0
Guarantee there’ll be at least one dissent. Few decisions are ever unanimous
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:20 am to PrecedentedTimes
quote:This should be one of those few decisions.
Guarantee there’ll be at least one dissent. Few decisions are ever unanimous
A single state shouldn’t get to decide who can run in a FEDERAL election.
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 10:21 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:20 am to PrecedentedTimes
Just because they vote 9-0 doesn’t mean it won’t be a majority decision and a ton of concurrencies.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:23 am to PrecedentedTimes
quote:
Guarantee there’ll be at least one dissent.
I see your one, and raise you two more.
Jackson
Sotomayor
Roberts or Kagan (Roberts most likely)
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:24 am to cbtullis
quote:
But I’d be shocked at anything but 9-0
This is an impossibility in 2024.
I'm afraid to say I'd be kinda shocked if enough of them don't side with Colorado.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:25 am to mtntiger
quote:
I see your one, and raise you two more.
Jackson
Sotomayor
Roberts or Kagan (Roberts most likely)
If 5 are on Trumps side Robert's will go that way.....he can cover that way.
If it is 4-4 be prepared to be bent over.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:26 am to mtntiger
quote:
I see your one, and raise you two more. Jackson Sotomayor Roberts or Kagan
I’m not so sure about that. Listening to their questions they all seem to be pretty skeptical of the case against Trump running.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:26 am to Ray Ray Rodman
Congress approved them to be ....Followed Section 5
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:29 am to Ray Ray Rodman
quote:
Trump atty arguing before that Confederate insurrectionists were elected to office, so Trump should be able to run for re-election, even if he is “a self-admitted insurrectionist.”
the vice president of the confederacy served as a representative in the us congress after the civil war.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:29 am to BHTiger
Colorado's attorney made a major mistake by being an a-hole to Kavanaugh in a statement he just made. Gorsuch quickly jumped in and subtly ripped him a new a-hole. Never respond to a Judge in such a assholish manner where you think you know more than them.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:30 am to Original Bayou Boy
The third clause of the 14th amendment does not even mention President. It originally did and they removed it.
This should be 9-0.
This should be 9-0.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:34 am to MrLSU
Kagan will surely toe the Marxist line.
I don’t understand why people can just decide he is guilty of insurrection. I must have missed the conviction.
I don’t understand why people can just decide he is guilty of insurrection. I must have missed the conviction.
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:35 am to SCwTiger
Methinks Gorsuch is schooling the Supreme Court newbie.
Loving Gorsuch
Loving Gorsuch
This post was edited on 2/8/24 at 10:36 am
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:36 am to Original Bayou Boy
Bugs the hell out of me when she refers to the founders as "framers".
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:39 am to anc
Meanwhile, the Hawaii legislature is wasting their time and preparing to vote to remove Trump ....
Turn the state over to the Japanese ....I was made to feel like I was back in Tokyo last time in Hawaii .....I could see over everyone with ease.
Waste of time ..... Like politicians ....
Turn the state over to the Japanese ....I was made to feel like I was back in Tokyo last time in Hawaii .....I could see over everyone with ease.
Waste of time ..... Like politicians ....
Posted on 2/8/24 at 10:44 am to cbtullis
quote:
But I’d be shocked at anything but 9-0
It'll be 6-3 as per the usual case where it is a slam dunk.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News