- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme Court to decide on whether or not civilians can own bump stock weapons
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:23 pm
LINK
February 28th. Keep your fingers crossed. If SCOTUS rules in favor of civilians owning full auto weapons, civilians can own any fully automatic weapon made after 1986 and not be criminalized for it. It’s about damn time they speak on this. I don’t want to have to shoot a shitty-arse semi-auto AK-47 at the range!
EDIT: made a mistake with the title. it’s not about overruling the Hughes Amendment, it’s about bump stocks. Vox is twisting the story around to make it sound like SCOTUS overruling the current bump stock ban will turn semi-auto weapons into fully-automatic weapons, which is bullshite. frick Vox and their fig journalists for pulling that shite.
February 28th. Keep your fingers crossed. If SCOTUS rules in favor of civilians owning full auto weapons, civilians can own any fully automatic weapon made after 1986 and not be criminalized for it. It’s about damn time they speak on this. I don’t want to have to shoot a shitty-arse semi-auto AK-47 at the range!
EDIT: made a mistake with the title. it’s not about overruling the Hughes Amendment, it’s about bump stocks. Vox is twisting the story around to make it sound like SCOTUS overruling the current bump stock ban will turn semi-auto weapons into fully-automatic weapons, which is bullshite. frick Vox and their fig journalists for pulling that shite.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:23 pm to JasonDBlaha
I’ll buy a couple of them for sure.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:25 pm to JasonDBlaha
If this happens, I'm going to build that Bulgarian AKS-74U kit that I've been sitting on for 20 years.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:28 pm to JasonDBlaha
FBI getting a boner for future tranny drone school shootings.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:31 pm to JasonDBlaha
I would rather be able to purchase a suppressor and walk out with it same day!
I’d go broke quickly trying to feed a full auto!
I’d go broke quickly trying to feed a full auto!
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:32 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
made after 1986
Why 1986?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:34 pm to MasterDigger
quote:
Why 1986?
Hughes amendment makes it illegal for civilians to own fully-automatic weapons made after 1986
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:34 pm to JasonDBlaha
Can’t wait to see the contortions they do to fit it under Bruen.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:35 pm to JasonDBlaha
Hog hunting could get interesting, dang
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:39 pm to JasonDBlaha
Shall not be infringed… the Founders didn’t intend for this to require an attorney to interpret
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:42 pm to Luke
quote:
Shall not be infringed… the Founders didn’t intend for this to require an attorney to interpret
Suburban white women are the reason why the anti-gun movement exists. They’re pussified cucks who think that the world should be this happy, bubbly place where everyone is nice to each other and no violence happens. This feminine ideology has been implanted into colleges and universities where the majority of student-populations are female. The very few male students at universities are being infected with this feminine ideology as well. It’s over. All you have to do is look at the statistics of Gen Z and what their political views are on trannies, guns, and abortions. It’s horrifying.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 8:52 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:44 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:If SCOTUS allows it, Dems will use it to scare the crap out of them.
Suburban white women are the reason we’re having this issue.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 8:56 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
If SCOTUS allows it, Dems will use it to scare the crap out of them.
They already are. Just look at the demographics of gun owners and see how the overwhelming majority of gun owners are male. Women don’t like guns because it’s part of their feminine nature to feel that way. They hate violence. They don’t like masculine things.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 9:03 pm to JasonDBlaha
Can we throw in explosive devices and grenade launchers too
Posted on 2/21/24 at 9:04 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
If SCOTUS allows it, Dems will use it to scare the crap out of them.
I’ll have a life time supply of DIASs by the time they can do anything about it.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 9:05 pm to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Hughes amendment makes it illegal for civilians to own fully-automatic weapons made after 1986
If they rule in favor of owning them, would you still need a tax stamp and all the bullshite transfer rules or would it put full autos on the shelf at your local gun store and require only background checks
Posted on 2/21/24 at 9:09 pm to deltaland
Title is misleading article is about bump stocks not actual machine guns
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News