- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Supreme Court temporarily lifts restrictions on Trump travel ban
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:29 pm
quote:
The Supreme Court on Monday granted the Trump administration's request to temporarily lift restrictions on the president's travel ban. In a one-page order signed by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court temporarily blocked the part of last week's 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that barred the government from prohibiting refugees that have formal assurances from resettlement agencies or are in the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program from entering the U.S. Kennedy said that part of the decision is stayed pending the receipt of a response from the state of Hawaii. That response that is due by noon on Tuesday. The Supreme Court's decision came less than two hours after Acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall filed a request for a stay.
quote:
The Trump administration's travel ban blocks travelers from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen from entering the U.S. for 90 days. The Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases that have been consolidated challenging the ban on Oct. 10.
LINK
9
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:29 pm to Jbird
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:31 pm to Jbird
Work. They be doin' it.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:32 pm to weagle99
Legggooooooo mates!
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:32 pm to Jbird
Supreme Court is literally Hitler
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:34 pm to Jbird
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:37 pm to Jbird
the Supreme Court just killed hundreds of millions of old ladies and babies
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:41 pm to OchoDedos
quote:Literally.
the Supreme Court just killed hundreds of millions of old ladies and babies
Posted on 9/11/17 at 2:44 pm to Jbird
NB4 some liberal judge tries an injunction anyway.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 3:41 pm to Jbird
It's incredible to me that this was even challenged. An incoming president can't put a simple 90 day moratorium to review immigration travel from these failed states.
Posted on 9/11/17 at 3:43 pm to Bard
quote:
NB4 some liberal judge tries an injunction anyway.
Eventually, a liberal judge is just goimg to straight up try and rule that a supreme court decision violates the constitution.
That'll be fun
Posted on 9/11/17 at 3:45 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
It's incredible to me that this was even challenged. An incoming president can't put a simple 90 day moratorium to review immigration travel from these failed states.
I'm sure not amazed that these idiots are suing over everything, but it DOES amaze me that Paul Ryan is such a pile of shite that he won't use the House's check in power (the power to impeach judges) to get rid of these judges who obviously are not ruling based on law.
Not even the nuttiest fruit bag on the left actually believes Trump didn't have the authority to ban immigration from wherever the hell he wants .
Posted on 9/11/17 at 5:08 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Paul Ryan is such a pile of shite that he won't use the House's check in power (the power to impeach judges) to get rid of these judges who obviously are not ruling based on law.
Agreed - there should be a high bar favoring judicial independence - and a low bar for the APPEARANCE of bias in rulings.
Any judge who consistently rules based on political trends needs to be removed from office, if not prosecuted for malfeasance in the execution of their duties. If a judge cannot determine that he has conflicts of interest in a particular case based on his political preferences, he has no business being in the position of judge.
Justice needs to be absolutely ruthless in the pursuit of the written LAW. There is no place in the justice system for sympathy, or progress, or feelings - only the written law should be considered.
If the law needs to be fixed, then that is the job of the legislature.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:39 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Agreed - there should be a high bar favoring judicial independence - and a low bar for the APPEARANCE of bias in rulings.
Any judge who consistently rules based on political trends needs to be removed from office, if not prosecuted for malfeasance in the execution of their duties. If a judge cannot determine that he has conflicts of interest in a particular case based on his political preferences, he has no business being in the position of judge.
So judges should be independent, but if they make decisions you don't like, they should be impeached and even jailed...
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:42 am to TigahFrosh
quote:
So judges should be independent, but if they make decisions you don't like, they should be impeached and even jailed...
Is that what he said at all? Why do you tools have to consistently lie about what others have said? or is this just a case of you are too stupid to have understood the point?
It's CLEAR that some judges rule based on their own personals political opinions rather than the law, those judges do not need to be judges. Whether I agree with their opinion or not.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:42 am to TigahFrosh
You have to really be an idiot if that's what you got from his comment. I suspect that you finished reading however, and saw that he said judges should rule based on law. And yes, if they rule on feelings or personal preference or political ideologies they should be removed
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:45 am to Jbird
If I were Trump I'd scrap the travel ban and announce to the world that the U.S. welcomes any and all refugees. Immediately following this announcement, I'd unveil plans to accommodate all inbound refugees by placing them in the state of Hawaii.
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:49 am to Jbird
Haven't been following these multiple challenges closely.
Are they expected to drop this temporary stay once Hawaii responds? Or keep it in place?
Are they expected to drop this temporary stay once Hawaii responds? Or keep it in place?
Posted on 9/12/17 at 8:58 am to Navytiger74
quote:Too close to call is my guess.
Are they expected to drop this temporary stay once Hawaii responds? Or keep it in place?
Posted on 9/12/17 at 10:56 am to Jbird
quote:
Too close to call is my guess.
I don't think it is, I think SCOTUS has already decided, POTUS obviously can do what Trump has done.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News