Started By
Message

re: Steve Ballmer to buy Los Angeles Clippers for NBA-record $2 billion

Posted on 5/30/14 at 12:02 am to
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 12:02 am to
quote:

I meant owning franchise had more value to him than the actual cash value in his pocket.

Tell yourself whatever you need to feel like you won.

$2 billion. Roll that around a minute. Sterling came out of this smelling like a rose.
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 12:03 am to
Is there an ignore button for this stupid arse?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Do you want to discuss the thread topic, because I really don't have time to waste on your arse tonight.


It has been laid out for you but you never address those points . You appear to be the first to resort to the attacks. You are a clueless individual.
Posted by SavageOrangeJug
Member since Oct 2005
19758 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 12:05 am to
quote:

It has been laid out for you but you never address those points . You appear to be the first to resort to the attacks. You are a clueless individual.


What part of, "Do you want to discuss the thread topic, because I really don't have time to waste on your arse tonight", did you fail to comprehend?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 5:22 am to
quote:

You and nopussybadazz seem to run that mouth together in every thread. Now do you have something constructive to say, boy?


Why did I fall asleep before this one
really got entertaining?
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 5:30 am
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 7:11 am to
quote:

And for you and cptotto, putting aside your lack of understanding of what owning an nba franchise means to a billionaire


Tell me, Chris....which one are you that you "understand".

Are you the billionaire, or the owner of an NBA franchise?
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 7:24 am to
I would like to know what the payout would be on this $2b investment. I don't know how much money the clipper's make annually but I don't think the new owner would recoup his investment in 20 years or until he sells the team. Personally I think this is a horrible financial investment but professional ownership is more about ego than ROI.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112511 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 7:43 am to
I just heard a female sports journalist blasting Ballmer. She said he should have spent the $2B for programs to help children living in poverty.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80272 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 8:14 am to
quote:

What part of, "Do you want to discuss the thread topic, because I really don't have time to waste on your arse tonight", did you fail to comprehend?


I'd like to discuss the thread topic.

Let's start here: LINK
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 8:21 am
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Personally I think this is a horrible financial investment

It probably is, but pro sports ownership isnt about ROI as much as it is the status and "fun" involved in owning a pro sports team. No different than buying a really expensive car (on a much larger scale of course) not because it was a savvy financial move, but because its awesome to have really nice cars when you rich.
quote:

but professional ownership is more about ego than ROI.

Bingo.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 8:56 am to
Too many big words for me boosie, was one of the 10 reasons the fact that the price got inflated so that the NBA would avoid getting "burned to the ground" like one of our resident financial scholars proposed?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73849 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 8:57 am to
quote:

t probably is, but pro sports ownership isnt about ROI as much as it is the status and "fun" involved in owning a pro sports team.


what?
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 8:58 am to
Whats confusing you?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73849 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 8:59 am to
Your entire statement that was quoted
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80272 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:00 am to
That's above my pay grade, too. We'll have to wait for SavageOrangeJug, chip salesman extraordinaire, B.S., MBA, J.D., L.L.M., CFP, CPA to come and enlighten us.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:05 am to
Don't know how to make it more clear, I didn't use any big words or anything
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Tell me, Chris.


Now Chris? Last time you were asking me about books I wrote. Who is it that you think I am??

Sports ownership for the billies isn't about $$$ it's about the enjoyment...it's a luxury item and/or ego item.

And interestingly, Sterling, is protesting the sale:

quote:

Donald Sterling's lawyer spoke with multiple outlets Thursday and said he has not signed off on any sale and that he does not want to sell. Keep in mind, if NBA lawyers have serious doubts about whether Donald Sterling's lack of cooperation would scuttle the sale to Ballmer, the league would have to proceed with the vote and sell the team itself -- at the risk of legal action.


LINK

Of course the trust has tried to have him declared incapacitated/incompetent, but he's fighting that, too.

But, in sum, those that suggested the money wasn't what he wanted, were correct.
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 9:07 am
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:07 am to
And dont forget cpt whose new sole mission in life is to ensure the destruction of pro sports in America. What a noble crusade that is!
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:09 am to
I really don't think they understand supply and demand. You have Tony Ressler and his group of investors bidding $1.2 billion. You have David Geffen and his team of billionaires, including Oprah, bidding on the team. They bid reportedly $1.6 billion. Then you have Ballmer bidding $2 billion. And these guys claim the team isn't worth that much. They apparently don't understand a team is worth what buyers are willing to pay for it. Here we have three buyers willing to pay more than what was thought was the value. What was thought was wrong.

It's like when LSU paid Saban his first ridiculously high salary. That was way above what the market was paying. He broke the seal.

He did it again this past year. You can't say he's not worth it. He clearly is, to Alabama.

I just can't figure out why these guys don't understand simple supply and demand.
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 9:11 am
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10590 posts
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

But, in sum, those that suggested the money wasn't what he wanted, were correct

If he wanted to sell for profit , he wouldn't have had to be forced into it. Clippers have never been hotter, and everyone knew that.
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram