So after 10 months FBI may have something, but having seen the campaign transcripts. . . .

Comey still testified there was no evidence? S0 now you know why he wouldn't testify that Trumps claims were false.

He did however lie about no evidence. Even if it was legally obtained, that's still evidence. Because the transcripts were passed among the IC, and sent to the WH. And since they were not Russia related, nor did they have any foreign intel value, it makes it more and more likely it was campaign surveillance

So, somebodys getting thrown under the bus. Or they end up taking each other down

This stinks of Chicago politics, BTW