- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Since the FBI admitted they interfered in the 2020 election to hurt Trump.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:09 pm to AggieHank86
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:09 pm to AggieHank86
What’s unbelievable about it? Did you miss the Facebook Russia disinfo hissy fit following 2016? Did you miss the widespread reporting prior to the election that the entire IC was calling the laptop Russian disinformation?
There’s nothing remotely unbelievable about this. But if you insist on white knighting for the left, you’ve painted yourself into a corner. Either the feds “influenced” the election by colluding with big tech, or big tech did it on their own. This behavior is the end of democracy according to democrats just 2 years ago. What’s changed?
There’s nothing remotely unbelievable about this. But if you insist on white knighting for the left, you’ve painted yourself into a corner. Either the feds “influenced” the election by colluding with big tech, or big tech did it on their own. This behavior is the end of democracy according to democrats just 2 years ago. What’s changed?
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 5:10 pm
1
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:10 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:You believe Zuckerberg, and you think that I am a “clown.”
Such a clown
Humorous.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:12 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Such a clown. The absolute worst.
Yep. Either the feds colluded with tech or tech did it in their own. Either way, an election was fricked with. Dems once said that was bad and was prepared to unseat a duly elected president over it.
#whatdifferenceatthispointdoesitmake
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:12 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:If Zuckerberg said it, it is subject to question.
What’s unbelievable about it?
Why are you asking me to defend positions that I have never taken and/or arguments that I have never made?
Very odd.
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 5:15 pm
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:15 pm to AggieHank86
I am not concerned about semantics. You have already stated the OP is not correct in his title. I have moved beyond that discussion point.
What is correct? And why is it acceptable for a federal agency to approach a social media outlet and request assistance? And for that social media outlet to adjust their practices in order to accommodate them?
You can disagree with what the OP asserted. But the central element of the argument has not been resolved.
What is correct? And why is it acceptable for a federal agency to approach a social media outlet and request assistance? And for that social media outlet to adjust their practices in order to accommodate them?
You can disagree with what the OP asserted. But the central element of the argument has not been resolved.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:16 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
You y try honk trump has morals
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:17 pm to AggieHank86
And the FBI is somehow more trustworthy? They went out in the news media and openly howled this disinformation excuse prior to the election, but thinking they did this with social media too is a bridge too far?
Tacit defense is still a defense. Attacking the “other side” constantly is a remarkably effective defense, even when you never verbally endorse a particular side.
It’s your entire Schtick on here. We’re not as stupid as you wish we were.
Tacit defense is still a defense. Attacking the “other side” constantly is a remarkably effective defense, even when you never verbally endorse a particular side.
It’s your entire Schtick on here. We’re not as stupid as you wish we were.
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
He can take the whole Russia collusion narrative on face value, but this, he needs a handwritten note, by three different people, with it notarized by the president.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:37 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:What the frick are you babbling about? I said from the beginning that Trump was not “colluding” with Russia.
He can take the whole Russia collusion narrative on face value
This is just ANOTHER example of the way that you dimwits attribute EVERYTHING that you dislike to anyone who disagrees with you on ANYTHING. Idiots.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:39 pm to AggieHank86
Just take the L and leave Hank.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:39 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
I have no idea what you are talking about since you didn't cite a source, but I will note that the FBI director was a guy who (checks notes) TRUMP APPOINTED
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:42 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:I am up 70-0, and you want me to “take the L” because you are too stupid to read the scoreboard.
Just take the L and leave Hank.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:44 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Did the FBI sit on the story?
It's interesting that your line of thinking doesn't come to a screeching halt right here. That's because I take you for a pretty bright guy, which is why your wishy-washy way here is instructive.
quote:
If ranking FBI personnel DID nix the investigation with an intent to assist Biden OR to hurt Trump, he should answer for it.
You're going out on a limb on this one, Hank. You're saying that if the FBI broke the f'n law, then someone should pay. Congrats.
Now how about answering the question I asked. It takes connecting dots, weighing some probabilities - you know, the sort of thing rational adults do all the time. So again -
Do you believe the FBI interfered with the 2020 election by suppressing the Biden laptop?
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:47 pm to David_DJS
quote:You want me to draw conclusions when I do not believe there to be enough data points.
Now how about answering the question I asked. It takes connecting dots, weighing some probabilities - you know, the sort of thing rational adults do all the time. So again - Do you believe the FBI interfered with the 2020 election by suppressing the Biden laptop?
Y’all are all-too-willing to do that on any given issue. I am not.
quote:Well, your compatriots insisted that I would not only “accept, but also “applaud,” such behavior.
You're saying that if the FBI broke the f'n law, then someone should pay. Congrats.
This post was edited on 8/27/22 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:54 pm to AggieHank86
Melt
Posted on 8/27/22 at 5:58 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
quote:
Melt
Posted on 8/27/22 at 6:01 pm to AggieHank86
quote:Zuckeberger - The FBI told us there was going to be a big data dump. Be vigilant.
You want me to draw conclusions when I do not believe there to be enough data points.
In your estimation, is that appropriate for the FBI to do?
Zuckeberger - We used third party fact checking.
Who was this third party fact check? How could they have checked an active investigation and determined it was misinformation?
Zuckeberger - During the five to seven days it was being determined to be true or false, distribution was decreased.
Is this the role of a social media outlet? To determine based on information from a federal agency and a third party fact checker whether something is true or false and decrease distribution accordingly?
Posted on 8/27/22 at 6:04 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
You want me to draw conclusions when I do not believe there to be enough data points.
Y’all are all-too-willing to do that on any given issue. I am not.
In an earlier post you essentially said you agree/believe that the FBI suppressed the laptop. What else do you need to know before you conclude that the FBI interfered in the election?
Posted on 8/27/22 at 6:06 pm to David_DJS
quote:
What else do you need to know before you conclude that the FBI interfered in the election?
He's going to need them to explain how they hacked into each individual machine, listing their serial numbers, and have the whole text notarized.
Posted on 8/27/22 at 6:13 pm to David_DJS
The FBI goes on a news media junket prior to the election, falsely declaring the laptop story “Russian disinformation”.
Mark Zuckerberg says they did the same thing with Facebook.
AggieHank: IMPOSSIBRU!!!!!!
Mark Zuckerberg says they did the same thing with Facebook.
AggieHank: IMPOSSIBRU!!!!!!
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News