- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Should anti-aircraft missiles be available for public purchase?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:17 pm
I don't support the adding of any gun restrictions that we do not already have, in just curious what the ancap LARPers around here have to say.
26
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:18 pm to cokebottleag
Yes.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:19 pm to cokebottleag
According to this board, biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons should be mass produced and on the discount aisle at Wal-Mart, available to anyone with a pulse.
Freedom!!!11!!
Freedom!!!11!!
This post was edited on 10/3/17 at 8:30 pm
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:20 pm to cokebottleag
I just want a flame thrower
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:22 pm to cokebottleag
Stop being obtuse
The second amendment makes it clear we should be able to be armed like the common infantry soldier in the US Army
All we would have to do is repeal the NFA
No need for nukes. That is no a weapon infantry carriers
The second amendment makes it clear we should be able to be armed like the common infantry soldier in the US Army
All we would have to do is repeal the NFA
No need for nukes. That is no a weapon infantry carriers
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:24 pm to cokebottleag
Dumb to argue whether something should be available for public purchase when it never will be.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:24 pm to Giant Leaf
But at the time of the 2nd amendment, it wasn't uncommon for private citizens to own armed warships. No one forced them to give them up or even challenged it.
Why shouldn't Mark zuckerberg be able to get an AEGIS cruiser if he wanted?
Because it would sit there. Doing nothing. I'm sure.
Why shouldn't Mark zuckerberg be able to get an AEGIS cruiser if he wanted?
Because it would sit there. Doing nothing. I'm sure.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:25 pm to cokebottleag
If Hillary had won...for sure. 
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:27 pm to cokebottleag
Because the militia clause is still there
Freedom to own whatever you wanted at the time has nothing to do with it at all
Your average militia member was not provided with a armed warship
So once again. It should be the standard arms of a soldier in the US Army.
Grenades, fully automatic weapons, claymores, etc should be 100% fine
Freedom to own whatever you wanted at the time has nothing to do with it at all
Your average militia member was not provided with a armed warship
So once again. It should be the standard arms of a soldier in the US Army.
Grenades, fully automatic weapons, claymores, etc should be 100% fine
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:28 pm to cokebottleag
Jesse Jackson actually thinks you can walk into a Costco and pick up a few surface to air missiles.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:28 pm to cokebottleag
Look I just want that machine gun grenade launcher combo
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:29 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
Should anti-aircraft missiles be available for public purchase?
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:31 pm to thelawnwranglers
quote:
Look I just want that machine gun grenade launcher combo
Does a deployed US Army private have access to one?
Absolutely you should going by the text
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:37 pm to cokebottleag
I want a bazooka and a rocket launcher for my birthday.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:42 pm to cokebottleag
I should be able to legally drive one of these through an ANTIFA protest IMO.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:44 pm to cokebottleag
Sure. Let me know how you will afford it.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:49 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
Should anti-aircraft missiles be available for public purchase?
Yes.
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:50 pm to MrLarson
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:51 pm to Giant Leaf
quote:
Because the militia clause is still there
Freedom to own whatever you wanted at the time has nothing to do with it at all
Your average militia member was not provided with a armed warship
So once again. It should be the standard arms of a soldier in the US Army.
I love seeing a stupid "gotcha" thread backfire on the ignorant OP
Posted on 10/3/17 at 8:56 pm to stout
quote:
They are expensive
No more so than you’d pay for a precision rifle.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News