Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS just limited the President!

Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:50 pm to
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Does anyone read the goddamn links?


Half the hacks on this board have their mind set and don't bother with substance.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11364 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:55 pm to
The libs on this board are paid shills.

No one would be stupid enough to be a liberal in real life.
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 3:55 pm
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79052 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:57 pm to
The resident retards have made their appearances without reading the OP
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:57 pm to
quote:


Here's another. Does anyone read the goddamn links?


No they wait for one of the right wingnuts to comment and then parrot whatever they said.
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:58 pm to
Seven. Pick your month for the o/u on impeachment while good dates are still not yet picked. I have march 2008 for date bill of impeachment is voted by committee prior to house vote.
Posted by Pinecone Repair
Burminham
Member since Nov 2013
7156 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Trump is playing his supporters for fools


Yeah... we're the fools
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48282 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:00 pm to
These are the same people that accuse others of being partisan hacks. Here is a list of the posters in this thread that didn't read the link and knee-jerked into their usual hackery:

Sevendust912
Wes B
Haughon99
Otto
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4314 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

I have march 2008 for date bill of impeachment is voted by committee prior to house vote.


I never understand what you're talking about. Are you making some weird Bush impeachment joke or do you not know what year it is?
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13494 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Here's one who didn't read the article.

He never lets reality get in the way of an illogical half baked idea.
He still thinks he scored a touchdown and 2 point conversion!
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111508 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

No they wait for one of the right wingnuts to comment and then parrot whatever they said.


And here's one who didn't read the thread.
Posted by Mulat
Avalon Bch, FL
Member since Sep 2010
17517 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Didn't read and made it about Trump. Holy shite


Future opportunities with MSM, they need that creativity
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:08 pm to
This Thread really went well for the Liberals. They seemed all absolutely committed two jumping in and looking like idiots. Wonder how many will come back and admit they fricked up? No. I don't really wonder. I know the answer
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Here's another. Does anyone read the goddamn links?




I did, I was more commenting on the general reaction. Hell, you don't even need to read the link, just read a calendar and understand how the Supreme Court works. This has to have applied to the Obama Administration, a Trump Administration case wouldn't have been ruled on by the Court in this session unless it was massive frontpage news that got fast tracked.
Posted by CrazyCow202
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2016
266 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 4:19 pm to
I think you need a lesson on what communism is buddy.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68140 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 5:04 pm to
quote:

OL he doesn't like the job so much now that he has to play by the rules ?

Trump is playing his supporters for fools


What a clown you are. This was a ruling against the the Obama admin. Even if you didn't read the story, someone who knew anything would suspect that since the Court had a ruling ready it must have heard the case months ago.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123869 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 5:18 pm to
quote:



This mentality led W's Administration to be significantly understaffed until 9/11.
Why is that good?
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48304 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 6:01 pm to
I like this decision
Posted by Dick Leverage
In The HizHouse
Member since Nov 2013
9000 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 6:10 pm to
Man, that was like you threw live crickets on multiple rods onto a bream bed! My God the ignorant progtards swarmed that shite up. Well done!
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

The libs on this board are paid shills.



And most of the trumpkins are just as dumb.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23690 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

Ginsburg and Sotomayor were the dissent. That's a strange majority/minority split.


Actually no. The issue is federalism, specifically deference to the rule making and decision making power of the executive. That was the primary issue considered by Obama in judicial appointments, including Merrick Garland. Deferral judges make the president stronger. Trump doesn't yet grasp this issue.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram