And by the way, no one claimed it proved AGW was false. They prove that most of the leaders in climate "science" corrupted the peer review process, distorted historical data, and used computer modeling to create a desired result by feeding it false data, overstated the "consensus" by filling it with unqualified signatories, regularly described their work as a "cause", rather than an ivestigation... And on. And on.
But yeah we should probably still trust them.
This post was edited on 5/3 at 1:57 pm