Started By
Message
locked post

POTUS Trump Begins Familiar Strategic Process – Pakistan Assigned Ownership of Afghanistan

Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:00 am
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:00 am
Important read. I snipped some important excerpts and provided a TL/DR but click this link to read it all.


quote:


A very familiar pattern is emerging as President Trump turns his attention toward solving the ongoing issues within Afghanistan. A very uniquely Trumpian geopolitical strategy based on assigned ownership, economics and self-interest.

Last night as President Trump addressed the nation to discuss the ongoing conflict within Afghanistan he took the first step: Trump assigned strategic ownership to Pakistan:

quote:

“The next pillar of our new strategy is to change the approach in how to deal with Pakistan. We can no longer be silent about Pakistan’s safe havens for terrorist organizations, the Taliban, and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond.

“Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan. It has much to lose by continuing to harbor criminals and terrorists. In the past, Pakistan has been a valued partner. Our militaries have worked together against common enemies.


“The Pakistani people have suffered greatly from terrorism and extremism. We recognize those contributions and those sacrifices, but Pakistan has also sheltered the same organizations that try every single day to kill our people. We have been paying Pakistan billions and billions of dollars, at the same time they are housing the same terrorists that we are fighting. But that will have to change. And that will change immediately.

“No partnership can survive a country’s harboring of militants and terrorists who target U.S. service members and officials. It is time for Pakistan to demonstrate its commitment to civilization, order, and to peace.


If anything President Trump stated was not the brutal reality the placement of strategic ownership would not work. However, the entire international community knows that Pakistan, including their intelligence service ISI, has a great deal of hidden sympathy toward Islamic extremists within Afghanistan.

Never was that reality more stark than when the international community realized that 9/11 terrorist Osama Bin Laden held refuge inside Pakistan for almost a decade. Within the governing systems inside Pakistan there is a large contingent of Taliban sympathy. This reality has been the 800lb gorilla amid public discussions of international national security for several years.

Last night President Trump called it out, publicly.

This is where those who follow Trump closely will note a familiar pattern emerging.

The Taliban in Afghanistan are to Pakistan, as the DPRK is to China.
quote:


Trump has made North Korea China's problem, and now he's made Afghanistan Pakistan's problem.

— Cari Kelemen ???? (@KelemenCari) August 22, 2017


Remember, the solution to the threat that is Kim Jong-un was to assign direct responsibility toward Beijing. In a similar approach, the solution toward eliminating the threat of extremist violence from the Taliban is to assign direct responsibility toward Pakistan. President Trump began that process last night.

However, those who have followed closely will note there’s additional references.

* When the threat is Sunni Extremism, the problem was/is the Muslim Brotherhood and the enabling of Qatar. Trump assigned responsibility for solving that issue to Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council. It is the GCC who are confronting Qatar, not the United States.

* When the threat is Syria’s chemical weapon, the problem was/is the Assad regime and ISIS. Trump assigned responsibility for solving that issue to Russia; Russia initially refused to solve it, so Trump bombed the shite out of Assad – Russia/Assad took ownership, the chemical weapon use stopped; further action was not needed by the United States.

* When the threat is DPRK’s nuclear weapons, the problem was/is Kim Jong-un and the enabling China. Trump assigned responsibility for solving that immediate threat to China. It was Beijing who told Kim Jong-un to stand down. Not the United States.

See the pattern? In each example President Trump assigns responsibility. However, the important element is the underlying ownership must be based entirely on truth. In each of the examples the truth was/is that Gulf States/Qatar, Assad/Russia, and China/Beijing were manipulating and enabling the problem behavior. By calling out that truth, each enabler was forced to take ownership and corrective action.

The same approach extends here with Afghanistan. However, the solution is not Pakistan eliminating the Taliban per se’; the solution lies in leveraging Pakistan to force the Taliban into negotiations with the legitimate Afghan government. Like the previous examples of Saudi Arabia and China, Trump has now assigned ownership of this objective to Pakistan.

The U.S. Military can/will engage the Taliban and Pakistan is on notice it better not act to enable the extremists.



quote:

So what can we anticipate as next steps? Well if the familiar pattern repeats:

Look for Pakistan to attempt to avoid ownership.
Look for President Trump and Secretary Tillerson to keep pulling Pakistan into each discussion point when referencing Afghanistan.
Look for President Trump tweets aimed at creating and affirming the U.S. expectations of Pakistan. Each time this happens the ownership gets stronger.
Look for our diplomatic team to talk about Pakistan helping to solve the problem.
Look for any affirming U.S. signals of warmth and friendship toward India.
These will all be indications of the ongoing strategy. So far, this economic geopolitical approach has worked well with Syria/Russia, Qatar/Saudi Arabia and DPRK/China. No reason not to be optimistic about Afghanistan (Taliban)/Pakistan.


Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:05 am to
If you haven't noticed....it's been almost two decades. We can't make Pakistan do anything. It's awful policy
Posted by Seldom Seen
Member since Feb 2016
40083 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:08 am to
quote:

If you haven't noticed....it's been almost two decades. We can't make Pakistan do anything. It's awful policy



Two decades of Bush and Obama. TRUMP is not those guys.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51805 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:08 am to
It's a brilliant strategy that working.


Unfortunately Trump won't get an ounce of credit for it.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:09 am to
Everything will be different this time!
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
12375 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:09 am to
quote:

We can't make Pakistan do anything.


Pakistan had never been truly pressured by us. We give them a good bit of money and support. If we start cozying up to India, their eternal rivals, they will start sweating. This has needed to happen for years.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
78565 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:09 am to
The shift to India and away from Pakistan is just about three decades too late. Not to mention that Hinduism and Christianity are culturally compatible in a way Islam and Christianity are not.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:09 am to
quote:

If you haven't noticed....it's been almost two decades. We can't make Pakistan do anything. It's awful policy


We will never be able pull troops out of Afghanistan. Our troops are not only there to control a potential safe haven for terrorists they are there to provide a strategic military force against a nuclear Pakistan.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
81632 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:09 am to
You can't let these dumb fricks choose to vote on their leaders. We've seen this like 5 times - they will vote to elect radical Muslim clerics and things will be as bad as ever.

This is infuriating. We failed over 7 years with Bush. We failed over 8 years with Obama. Now you're saying that because Trump is using Bush's tactics again (with about 1/5th the military backing) it will somehow work? Insanity. Utter insanity.

THIS MONEY SHOULD BE GOING TOWARDS INFRASTRUCTURE. HEALTHCARE. THE WALL. ANYTHING BUT BLOWING UP MOSLEMS AND REBUILDING THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE SO THAT THEY CAN DESTROY IT AGAIN IN 30 YEARS.
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 8:11 am
Posted by Yak
DuPage County
Member since May 2014
4672 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:10 am to
All I read was "broken campaign promise"
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:10 am to
Which is expensive and completely ineffective. Hence, terrible policy
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:13 am to
quote:

The shift to India and away from Pakistan is just about three decades too late.


Agree.

quote:

Not to mention that Hinduism and Christianity are culturally compatible in a way Islam and Christianity are not.



I alluded to this in another thread a couple of days ago. If the U.S. is going to import immigrants I would love to see more Indians. They practically instantly assimilate. Dunkin' Donuts everywhere.
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:14 am to
The Soviet Union couldn't even take over and indoctrinate these people. They were far more brutal than we'll ever be. We aren't willing to truly do what it takes over there, and never have been. GTFO of that entire area of the planet
This post was edited on 8/22/17 at 8:15 am
Posted by TX Tiger
at home
Member since Jan 2004
35632 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:17 am to
I can't be the only one on this board amused by the desperation of some of you to cling to the "Trump is anti-establishment" charade.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Now you're saying that because Trump is using Bush's tactics again (with about 1/5th the military backing) it will somehow work? Insanity. Utter insanity.


It's not Bush's tactics. Read the article. Bush never applied economic pressure to Pakistan and certainly never twisted India's arm.

shite, I know it falls on deaf ears to say it's going to be different this time...so I won't. But we are in a quagmire. If we leave we will be right back in, in two years after terrorist hit the U.S. and the west.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118760 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:20 am to
quote:

hey were far more brutal than we'll ever be.


Russia never applied economic pressure to the surrounding countries to help solve the problem.
Posted by Yak
DuPage County
Member since May 2014
4672 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:22 am to
quote:

If we leave we will be right back in, in two years after terrorist hit the U.S. and the west.
Or, we could go with what campaign Trump said and GTFO of the middle east, secure our borders, and increase our already stringent vetting process letting these cavemen in our country.

But nah, let's spend our money elsewhere
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Fortunately creating “leverage” is almost a uniquely Trumpian life-skill.  Throughout Trump’s business career he’s been a master at leverage. 
shite like this is why nobody should take articles like this seriously. The "incredible business man, master negotiator, only hires the best!" myth is done. It's over.
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
9635 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Everything will be different this time!




It sure is different from an American leadership position. They have been dealing with a spineless regime here for way too long.
Posted by ILeaveAtHalftime
Member since Sep 2013
2889 posts
Posted on 8/22/17 at 8:26 am to
Bookmark this post if you want. We will change nothing (0) about Pakistan's behavior. The biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the history of the world is our biggest ally in that horrible region, and we have done nothing.

4,000 troops cannot secure the border with a nuclear state with a capable military and intelligence infrastructure. And neither can frickin Tweets.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram