re: Portland terrorist

quote:

---

Once again, you ignorant frick. People weren't defending him. People were correcting your dumb arse on what is and is not terrorism.

---

Uh, you might want to read what I just posted first. None of the defenses I posted were saying it's not terrorism. I did not include those. In fact, some of the posts used the word defend, defending, defense, etc. Uh, that's defending him. I Know you have a hard time admitting it, because, to you your own words,

quote:

---

you ignorant frick

---

quote:

---

That's a citizen defending himself against 3 attackers trying to suppress his Freedom of Speech. Self defense case.

Just because someone is being a jerk with words is not a reason to lay hands on them. Do so at your own peril, obviously.

---

quote:

---

I like how they blame the American for the attack when there were 2 Muslims right there that they can't find now

Fake news

---

quote:

---

Self defense case.
Im guessing this is not how it's going to go down.


From the little I have read about it that is exactly what is going to go down and he may very likely prevail.

---

quote:

---

I'm sure the Muslims attacked first

---

quote:

---

We still don't have the facts here, y'all are jumping to conclusions. 2 Muslims are on a train, an American guy starts yelling (probably for help) and now people are dead (stabbed just like in the France terror attacks) and the Muslims can't be found

Hmmm something is suspicious here....

---

You strike me as a Tariq Nasheed fan.

Public execution is cruel and unusual punishment. Regardless of their crime. I figured this was obvious. Didn't think you'd actually make me type it out.

quote:

---

So I'll take back my statement calling you ignorant. This one time.

---

Deal.

We disagree then

Just curious.

What makes a public execution cruel and unusual compared to a closed execution? They would do the exact same thing. The prisoner would still die in the exact same manner.

What if they just let one news camera in and broadcast it live on TV?

Is it cruel because it's broadcast live?

So descriptive.

So are videos showing military action against the enemy cruel? Wwii film? Live video of a police chase that ends in a shootout? The Dallas shootout where we saw cops shot live on TV?

Your explanation is live on screen death is cruel. Yet we have a plethora of other examples of deaths live on screen all the time.

And then movies. Oh the movies. They can handle a guy sawing his own foot off? But watching a guy get an IV and going to sleep is cruel?

Or video games.

The list goes on and on.

Why are public execution cruel and unusual but the rest are perfectly fine to broadcast live to the world?

I'm actually quite curious in how you answer this.

Terrorism is an act to cause fear or terror for political, religious, or ideological reasons. It is not terrorism if someone just starts killing people or is trying to kill people.

It may be defined as a hate crime or just murder. This happens everyday

Video doesn't show him using the N-word.

quote:

---

That's a citizen defending himself against 3 attackers trying to suppress his Freedom of Speech. Self defense case.

Just because someone is being a jerk with words is not a reason to lay hands on them. Do so at your own peril, obviously.

---

I have not seen what they are referring to. If they were attacking him, they were wrong and he has the right to defend himself regardless if he is a white supremacist. Saying that does not = defending what he stood for or against.

quote:

---

I like how they blame the American for the attack when there were 2 Muslims right there that they can't find now

---

The rest Seems to be looking for more information and not defending.

Where am I missing what you are saying?

quote:

---

Based on his Facebook comments and based on people flat out defending him in the other thread. 

---

looks like mostly he hates the Jews, so he's probably a leftist. He would get along with golden nugget