Officer in Eric Garner case: I never used a choke hold

that is correct and many martial arts experts have already said that. But if you look in that other thread,Efrad clearly tells us it was an illegal choke hold.It's disgusting the narrative of this whole thing and how blindly people are following the false story.

And there you have it. Watch the video.

If the standard for deeming the maneuver a chokehold is the application of pressure to the windpipe, and the medical examiner listed compression of the windpipe as a contributioning factor to death (from what I've read), is the officer lying or is the medical examiner wrong?

Is any compression of the neck a "chokehold" as the NYPD defines chokehold?

quote:

---

the medical examiner listed compression of the windpipe as a contributioning factor to death (from what I've read)

---

you read wrong and are blatantly making shite up now.

I'm on my phone. Can someone quote the NYPD policy on chokeholds?

Google "doctor negligent homicide" and come back and let us know what you found.

Gfy. Idiot.

quote:

---

"doctor negligent homicide"

---

So you saying any accidental death by a doctor during surgery is negligent?

I think the whole issue with this case is that people are looking at it immediately from the perspective of "this isn't right." I just think that's not fair minded. If you don't assume nefarious purposes or unconscious bias that works in A nefarious way, and you just ask yourself how did they arrive at this decision, you can see several avenues but which they did so.

That says nothing about the way the grand jury process worked, or the way that it should work. I'm just talking about this case. And the facts. And the law. Not a social crusade