- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Obama will move forward with EO on amnesty
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:55 am
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:55 am
and here....we.....go
yeah it's Breitbart, but the link is to ABC news Jonathan Karl so EABOD if you don't like it
quote:
ABC News Chief White House Correspondent Jon Karl reported that according to WH officials “the president will move forward with an executive order on immigration reform “no matter how big a shellacking Democrats get tonight” during ABC’s Election coverage on Tuesday.
Karl said “White House officials are saying that you can expect the president to set an aggressive, and defiant tone tomorrow. You're not going to see any mea culpas, no big firings, no change in direction.”
He added “officials tell me the president is prepared to aggressively pursue his agenda using his power of executive authority, where he can't work with Congress, and the big one is going to be on immigration reform. White House officials tell me that the president will move forward with an executive order on immigration reform no matter how big a shellacking Democrats get tonight.”
yeah it's Breitbart, but the link is to ABC news Jonathan Karl so EABOD if you don't like it
8
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:57 am to jamboybarry
democrats are determined to build a coalition against the american people... what better way to do it than add 15 million new democratic voters?
Posted on 11/5/14 at 6:58 am to jamboybarry
This is going to get interesting really fast.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:00 am to Radiojones
Msnbc has been trying to soothe their hurt by ensuring their sheeple of how very very different the American electorate will look in 2016. Makes me want to puke.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:00 am to jamboybarry
Actions and words.
Say you're willing to work with Congress and get the soundbites, do what you want and bypass Congress it goes under reported or unreported by all networks except Fox.
Say you're willing to work with Congress and get the soundbites, do what you want and bypass Congress it goes under reported or unreported by all networks except Fox.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:01 am to jamboybarry
Can't wait for this. He's going to get buried.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:03 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
Say you're willing to work with Congress and get the soundbites, do what you want and bypass Congress it goes under reported or unreported by all networks except Fox.
This worked for a while but it would appear that America is on to him. The man now holds the historical record of losing the most House seats during his administration. That has to sting just a bit.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:09 am to jamboybarry
He might as well. Who's going to challenge him? Boehner? McConnell? Don't be silly. They'll piss and moan but won't do a damned thing, because, when it's all said and done, it's what they want anyway.
If they were against it, they would have sided with the Tea Party folks.
If they were against it, they would have sided with the Tea Party folks.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:11 am to mtntiger
My thing is this: what is the benefit to republicans to have blanket amnesty?
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:12 am to tigerbandpiccolo
quote:
My thing is this: what is the benefit to republicans to have blanket amnesty?
Cheap labor. The chamber of commerce Repubs desparately want this to happen. It's why Romney is on the Sunday shows running his fricking mouth about an immigration reform bill being the first priority of a Repub congress.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:12 am to tigerbandpiccolo
quote:
My thing is this: what is the benefit to republicans to have blanket amnesty?
i think they're dumb enough to believe they can get win a fair share of those new voters..
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:13 am to Clint Torres
Because that has worked so well for them in the last two presidential elections.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:16 am to jamboybarry
It was asked in another thread and not really answered so I'll ask it here:
What is the mechanism for blocking EO's?
I am admittedly completely ignorant on this particular subject.
What is the mechanism for blocking EO's?
I am admittedly completely ignorant on this particular subject.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:23 am to Bamadiver
I don't think there's much that can be done. EOs are supposed to be used for policy, not lawmaking.
If the President creates a full-scale law using an EO, then it could be challenged in court, though that's been tried before and hasn't worked.
Since the House holds the purse-strings, the Reps could choose not to fund whatever mechanism is required to carry out the EO.
If the President creates a full-scale law using an EO, then it could be challenged in court, though that's been tried before and hasn't worked.
Since the House holds the purse-strings, the Reps could choose not to fund whatever mechanism is required to carry out the EO.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:26 am to Radiojones
quote:
This worked for a while but it would appear that America is on to him. The man now holds the historical record of losing the most House seats during his administration. That has to sting just a bit.
Dude could care less. If a narcissist was worried about the fallout from narcissism he wouldn't be a narcissist
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:27 am to mtntiger
quote:Well, that's depressing. Last night was a huge message that may well be drowned out by an influx of millions of voters.
mtntiger
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:27 am to Bamadiver
I would like to know what the protocol is for fighting EO's, too. It has to be more complicated than Obama simply issuing an EO and it's a done deal.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:30 am to KCT
Supreme Court can declare an EO to be unconstitutional. 5-4 Needed.
Posted on 11/5/14 at 7:33 am to mtntiger
Even his most loyal 95% followers aren't for this because most of them have figured out that the river swimmers will be taking their jobs.
Dis gon git guud!
Dis gon git guud!
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News