- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYT and other cuck media using Chicom click farms to stay relevant
Posted on 6/15/17 at 8:23 pm
Posted on 6/15/17 at 8:23 pm
This post was edited on 6/15/17 at 8:24 pm
10
Posted on 6/15/17 at 8:26 pm to CptBengal
How anyone still believes these fools anymore is beyond me.
Posted on 6/15/17 at 8:30 pm to CptBengal
Posted on 6/15/17 at 8:31 pm to CptBengal
Has to be such a depressing profession
Posted on 6/15/17 at 8:49 pm to CptBengal
Dude... That's insane.
Posted on 6/15/17 at 9:49 pm to gatorrocks
It's absurd.
Posted on 6/15/17 at 9:57 pm to CptBengal
Got anything beyond the screenshot? Link?
Posted on 6/15/17 at 10:09 pm to CptBengal
Oh, it was from ~5 months ago, posted on ibankcoin.com. Sweet.
Posted on 6/15/17 at 11:25 pm to rbWarEagle
The image clearly says February you fricking imbecile.
But good job! You did it!
But good job! You did it!
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:13 am to rbWarEagle
Yea, the when is more important than the why.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:43 am to CptBengal
Yeah, no shite. So it's a fricking wonder why you posted it in June, you mongoloid dipshit.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:46 am to GeauxLSUGeaux
How about the source? But NyT is fake news, right?
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:48 am to rbWarEagle
damn. You mad as hell.
I fail to see how those numbers aren't relevant. Common sense says that if those numbers are true, i.e. The exponential growth in China clicks, then It likely hasn't self corrected in only four months
I fail to see how those numbers aren't relevant. Common sense says that if those numbers are true, i.e. The exponential growth in China clicks, then It likely hasn't self corrected in only four months
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:50 am to John McClane
The point is: who the frick knows if it's true? Check the source. Cpt Dingleberry posted a 4 month old screenshot with no link and got 10+ upvotes. Honestly, what the frick?
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:54 am to rbWarEagle
Well, while you bring up a good point regarding the lack of a link/source, that is not the only point you brought up. You clearly have a problem about the timing.
If he provides a solid link, your other point is quite weak
If he provides a solid link, your other point is quite weak
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:55 am to John McClane
Even if he provided a link, it wouldn't have been solid. I did his homework for him and found a shoddy link.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 12:58 am to rbWarEagle
Doesn't change the fact that you were up in arms about the timing.
The source is a legitimate gripe.
However if the source is legit, then timing really doesn't mean shite.
The source is a legitimate gripe.
However if the source is legit, then timing really doesn't mean shite.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 1:02 am to John McClane
I wasn't up in arms about the timing - just pointed it out. As the colloquialism goes... (poorly sourced) "Germans"
Posted on 6/16/17 at 1:19 am to CptBengal
I'm sure you looked deeper into the issue to see if there was another possible explanation. I'm assuming your internet was somehow unable to find this story that was published across the internet, but apparently China had the New York Times application removed from the Apple App Story on 12/23/16.
China Internet Censorship: New York Times Apps Removed
12/22/16--Day before taken off app store. (China 10.1%)
12/29/16--One week later (China 21.3%)
01/05/17--Two weeks later (China 32.1%)
01/12/17--Three weeks later (China 39.1%)
02/19/17--Two months later (China 3.4%)
Clearly the New York Times decided it needed to stay relevant, even though it had a global ranking of 94th when China was 3.4% of the traffic on 02/19 A HUGE DECLINE of ZERO from its 94th ranking on 01/19.
They need to find a better click farm to stay relevant. I'll refer them to CptBengal.
China Internet Censorship: New York Times Apps Removed
quote:Given the lack of access via the application, and the publicity, I wonder if there is a trend in the 30 days monthly tracking? Well let's see.
The app was removed on Dec. 23 following a request from the Chinese authorities, the paper said Wednesday.
12/22/16--Day before taken off app store. (China 10.1%)
12/29/16--One week later (China 21.3%)
01/05/17--Two weeks later (China 32.1%)
01/12/17--Three weeks later (China 39.1%)
02/19/17--Two months later (China 3.4%)
Clearly the New York Times decided it needed to stay relevant, even though it had a global ranking of 94th when China was 3.4% of the traffic on 02/19 A HUGE DECLINE of ZERO from its 94th ranking on 01/19.
They need to find a better click farm to stay relevant. I'll refer them to CptBengal.
Posted on 6/16/17 at 1:23 am to buckeye_vol
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News