- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Not Just An Innocent Jogger!
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:52 pm to JohnnyKilroy
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:52 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Has it ever been in contention that they were physically in the act of chasing at the time of the death?
Yes. In fact, More&Les said it. I responded to his claim that he was being chased. You aren’t very bright are you?
1
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:54 pm to Hot Carl
[quote]
Do you not know the word arrest literally means “to stop?”
And they had no legal authority to arrest/stop/detain/hold him. Since they did not have the authority to perform a legal citizen’s arrest, then by default, they committed assault. Since they were armed, it is aggravated assault (though, I think the trucks could even be argued as well). Since aggravated assault is a felony and another person died during the commission of that felony, under Georgia law, that is murder.[/quote
They said they wanted to stop and talk to him. They didn’t say they wanted to stop and hold him. Big difference.
I’m just going by what they said, and what they said wasn’t that they intend to arrest him and hold him for authorities.
And no doubt trying to stop Arbery and then chasing him ( for how long we don’t know) and finally getting into a position that leads to the altercation Iis on them, not Arbery.
Do you not know the word arrest literally means “to stop?”
And they had no legal authority to arrest/stop/detain/hold him. Since they did not have the authority to perform a legal citizen’s arrest, then by default, they committed assault. Since they were armed, it is aggravated assault (though, I think the trucks could even be argued as well). Since aggravated assault is a felony and another person died during the commission of that felony, under Georgia law, that is murder.[/quote
They said they wanted to stop and talk to him. They didn’t say they wanted to stop and hold him. Big difference.
I’m just going by what they said, and what they said wasn’t that they intend to arrest him and hold him for authorities.
And no doubt trying to stop Arbery and then chasing him ( for how long we don’t know) and finally getting into a position that leads to the altercation Iis on them, not Arbery.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:54 pm to More&Les
quote:
Im a died in the wool 25 year card carrying conservative. I can't stand race baiting bullshite but you are the one making about race, not me, you stupid frick.
Ok, race
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:54 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Yes. In fact, More&Les said it. I responded to his claim that he was being chased. You aren’t very bright are you?
You're too fricking stupid to fricking discuss abc with
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:54 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
They had reasonable cause to approach him.
Cite the law that says that. There is zero evidence of theft by Mr. Arbery, as you admitted.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:55 pm to More&Les
quote:
No offense, or be offended IDGAF, but you don't have a fricking clue what you are taking about.
Then tell me where I’m wrong on what was posted.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:55 pm to More&Les
quote:
You're too fricking stupid to fricking discuss abc with
And you’re a genius ^^^
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:56 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
There is zero evidence of theft by Mr. Arbery, as you admitted
So, AA committed no crime that day?
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:56 pm to luckylefty
quote:
This ends with them behind bars where they belong.
Maybe so, but it’ll be due to more evidence than that video. It shows nothing of the sort of nonsense the emotional on this board say it does.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:56 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
So, AA committed no crime that day?
Did I say that? I said there was zero evidence of theft on the video.
Can you read, Errerrerrwere? You seem to be misreading simple sentences.
This post was edited on 5/12/20 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:58 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
So, AA committed no crime that day?
He may have committed a misdemeanor trespass, that is neither grounds for a citizen arrest (or detainment) nor would it carry the death penalty
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:58 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Did I say that? I said there was zero evidence of theft on the video.
So, after he committed a crime; the neighbors have no right to question him? Confront him?
“Hey, I’m over here in this house being remodeled with my mother in law; we don’t own the property. Nothing to see. Thanks.”
“Oh. Ok. I didn’t know you guys were just having a ‘looksie.’ Go right ahead. Don’t mind us neighbors!”
Posted on 5/12/20 at 9:59 pm to More&Les
quote:
He may have committed a misdemeanor trespass, that is neither grounds for a citizen arrest (or detainment) nor would it carry the death penalty
I thought you weren’t talking to me? Jesus, you’re either a fricking woman or my wife!
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:00 pm to CDawson
quote:
Maybe so, but it’ll be due to more evidence than that video. It shows nothing of the sort of nonsense the emotional on this board say it does.
Who said the video was the only evidence? But if you think that video helps the McDumbasses you might want to look into their current incarceration and ask yourself when that happened...
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:01 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
He may have committed a misdemeanor trespass, that is neither grounds for a citizen arrest (or detainment) nor would it carry the death penalty
I thought you weren’t talking to me? Jesus, you’re either a fricking woman or my wife!
I just said you were too fricking stupid to discuss simple concepts with, as you continue to prove
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:03 pm to More&Les
quote:
I just said you were too fricking stupid to discuss simple concepts with, as you continue to prove
So, you’re a woman then. Got it.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:03 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
So, after he committed a crime; the neighbors have no right to question him? Confront him?
No, actually. If you post the Georgia law that says otherwise I'd be happy to admit my fault.
You seem oddly invested in this for someone who misunderstands the legal side of the incident. Have you by chance ever worked as a DA in Brunswick?
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:04 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
So, after he committed a crime; the neighbors have no right to question him? Confront him?
Again, they do not have the right to chase, detain and murder him.
All that other mother in law shite you are babbling about is fricking irrelevant and characteristically stupid
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:05 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Have you by chance ever worked as a DA in Brunswick?
No. And from your previous post earlier today, neither have you!
Posted on 5/12/20 at 10:07 pm to More&Les
quote:
All that other mother in law shite you are babbling about is fricking irrelevant and characteristically stupid
You don’t agree with me! You are a stupid meanie pants, man.
Jesus, Karen. Take a Midol.
Page 22 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News