Started By
Message
locked post

New Orleans is tearing down its Confederate monuments, starting with the 'most offensive'

Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:12 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146790 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:12 am
Circa News - Learn. Think. Do.
quote:

April 24, 2017

New Orleans city workers started tearing down one of four prominent Confederate monuments early Monday morning, a move hailed by some as a victory for diversity and criticized by others as an erasure of history.

The Liberty Place Monument, an 1891 obelisk honoring the Crescent City White League, was the first to go. Mayor Mitch Landrieu said it was the "most offensive of the four" and that it was built to "revere white supremacy." The CCWL attempted to overthrow a biracial government during post-Civil War Reconstruction.







View Picture Gallery
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:14 am to
If u were a business there, I'd put a replica Lee statue on my property or building.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:15 am to
So when will monuments of our founding fathers be taken down? They were traitors to Britain as the South was considered to the U.S..
Posted by Parmen
Member since Apr 2016
18317 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:19 am to
quote:

So when will monuments of our founding fathers be taken down? They were traitors to Britain as the South was considered to the U.S..


1) It was justified. 2) They actually won.
Posted by 4WHLN
Drinking at the Cottage Inn
Member since Mar 2013
7581 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:20 am to
This is a sad day for New Orleans
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38783 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:20 am to
Which is most offensive?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146790 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:21 am to
Louisiana needs to get Landrieu and JBE the heck out. The damage they will cause will be unattainable to reverse.

This is beyond surreal ridiculous. Removing these statues does WHAT EXACTLY?

It fulfills one of the COMMUNIST planks entered into Congress as a warning sign to the United States of America.

Read 30 and 31 here
This post was edited on 4/24/17 at 7:23 am
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:22 am to
quote:

1) It was justified. 2) They actually won.



Well you know what? The next time the leftists get power, squash dissent, and turn the country into Venezuela it will turn out the South was right but a couple hundred years early. A couple hundred years is a blink of the eye in history.
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31499 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:22 am to
quote:

It was justified


Most just-war theorists say otherwise.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54210 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:22 am to
quote:

1) It was justified.


How so? Because of taxes?

quote:

They actually won.



So only if you win are your actions justified?
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90617 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:24 am to
I can understand the first one if it does in fact honor the crescent city white league.

Tearing down the others such as statues of Lee is just moronic.
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18023 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:24 am to
I don't understand the attachment to these confederate statues.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
15325 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:28 am to
Parmen you are trying really hard to be the worst poster on pt today
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
38783 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:29 am to
quote:

don't understand the attachment to these confederate statues.


Couldn't care less personally

Seems like wasted of money
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Homesick Tiger


Bring it Homie, use that Washitaw Parish edukashun!
Posted by white beans
Member since Sep 2009
5637 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:31 am to
Andrew Jackson was a confederate?
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24751 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:31 am to
Chocolate city?
Posted by Crimson1st
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2010
20223 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:31 am to
To me it isn't an attachment to the statues at all...it is the fact that the left feels it can step in and purge, at will, any item/entity that can be deemed offensive by an "aggrieved" group. This is how it starts...where it leads from here is the issue.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68245 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:32 am to
The Liberty Place Monument can go. I believe it was already moved to be "hidden" where it is now about twenty years ago. It's understandably the most offensive.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99013 posts
Posted on 4/24/17 at 7:33 am to
This first one is just an obelisk, so who really cares. You know who else liked obelisks? Slave owning Egyptians.
















And probably Hitler too.





Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram