Started By
Message

re: NBC Nightly News topics in order

Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:03 pm to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42876 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

Someone had to eventually step up and take Rex's place.


Rex was never that stupid.
Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

That's bc it's false.

You better write a letter to Sessions, the House and Senate Intel committees and let them know before they go wasting their time investigating some Russian BS...fricking retard.
Posted by geauxtigs999
Member since Aug 2017
682 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:03 pm to
Isn’t all of this coming from the fever swamps on Fox?
Posted by geauxtigs999
Member since Aug 2017
682 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:12 pm to
I bet as much comes from it as did “unmasking”.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39591 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:13 pm to
They are probably getting it from the house and senate intel committees who are both investigating the matter. Specious sources at best.


Retard or troll? Inquiring minds want to know.
Posted by wookalar1013
up ta camp
Member since Jun 2017
2006 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:28 pm to
quote:

This is a lie All projections show a cold snowy wet winter for most of the U.S.


except the weather channel - LINK

and noaa - LINK

and usa today- LINK

you really need to relax, "they" aren't out to get you

Posted by AU_Right
Member since Oct 2016
3048 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

I bet as much comes from it as did “unmasking”.

...so now it's not "false"?
Posted by MadDoggyStyle
Member since Feb 2012
3857 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 7:51 pm to
Snopes doesn’t sound that confident.

quote:

An enormous volume of interest and speculation surrounds the workings of the Clinton Foundation, which is to be expected. Given the enormous sums of money it controls and the fact that it is run by a former U.S. president who is married to a possible future U.S. president, the foundation deserves all the scrutiny it gets, and more. At the same time, for the sake of accuracy it’s crucial to differentiate between partisan accusations and what we actually know about it — however little that may be.


Update from Snopes sounds like they are shilling for Hillary.

quote:

On 17 October 2017, The Hill reported obtaining evidence that Vadim Mikerin, a Russian official who oversaw the American operations of the Russian nuclear agency Rosatom, was being investigated for corruption by multiple U.S. agencies while the Uranium One deal was up for approval — information that apparently was not shared with U.S. officials involved in approving the transaction. The Hill also reported receiving documents and eyewitness testimony “indicating Russian nuclear officials had routed millions of dollars to the U.S. designed to benefit former President Bill Clinton’s charitable foundation during the time Secretary of State Hillary Clinton served on a government body that provided a favorable decision to Moscow,” although no specifics about who those Russian nuclear officials were or how the money was allegedly routed to the Clinton Foundation were given. In any case, none of these revelations prove that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton participated in a quid pro quo agreement to accept payment for approval of the Uranium One deal.
This post was edited on 10/19/17 at 7:57 pm
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82376 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:11 pm to
But I was told that Lester Holt is a registered Republican!?!?
Posted by geauxtigs999
Member since Aug 2017
682 posts
Posted on 10/19/17 at 8:24 pm to
Well, nothing has come from the unmasking story.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram