Museums are Next

I don't like that the statues are being taken down, but I'm not worked up enough about it to act like a fool.
However, if they try to have Confederate Memorial Hall or Beauvoir closed up, then I will be acting like a fool.

At what point will the producers get fed up and start defending themselves from the parasites?

quote:

---

People defending the removal of Confederate statues say a museum is the appropriate place to learn about history. Anyone want to bet museums will be the next front? I can hear the calls to remove offensive and oppressive exhibits and symbols already.

---

If museums were to be attacked, I think it's still in the relatively distant future.

However, it's not too difficult to anticipate the argument.

"Displaying these symbols of hatred and bigotry in public museums is idolizing and celebrating the fact that they even existed. They've been rightfully relegated to the trash heap of history so let's rightfully put them in the physical trash heap where they belong. As a society, we should be celebrating and remembering the best things of our past, not the worst."

Progressivism has no brakes, no final destination. Utopia never arrives. It's probably a clinical issue for some adherents.

a big part of destroying America is rewriting and dismantling its history along with removing any symbols of pride or remembrance about our history.

the socialist brainwashing going on in our schools for the last 20 years is showing up in force with a whole generation who not only celebrate Americas downfall but want to actively commit acts of terrorism to accomplish it.

until schools are transformed into institutions of learning and no longer about liberal indoctrination and activist training grounds, this country will never be rid of the likes of the BLM and Antifa terrorists

If they do go after the public museums, what are the chances of some wealthy entrepreneur types buying the exhibits from some slightly shady or two faced liberal politician (could go either way but I love hypocrisy so we are making an assumption here)in exchange for a little pocket lining action, who was possibly one of the people pushing for the closers to begin with to appease his / her constituents so they can be re-elected and continue living off the government teet? This entrepreneur then opens a private museum that (s)he charges entry for and makes money hand over fist from the half of the country that doesn't want to destroy history and the private schools' field trips (who are not funded by the gov't or trying to limit learning and diversity of thought like the public schools)?

Which (s)he should have a good run with for at least a few decades before someone tries to introduce "hate speach / display in private institutes that are open to the public for viewing" which gets passed by temper tantrums being thrown. (S)he then sells off all the artifacts, for large sums of money, to private people to keep in their homes.

All the money being made and passed around from the entrepreneur and shady politicians, just goes to prove two points:

1) People want to see history even if it goes against their morals, upbringing, or sickens / offends them in some way (see the holocaust exhibit at the Smithsonian for proof). They are even willing to spend their money on it.

2) Politicians typically do not give a rats arse about the wants and needs of the people they represent, nor do they care for what is good for the country first. Their first priority is making money for themselves and setting up their family with a good life regardless of what they preach on taxing the rich or helping people. They will literally sell their soul or twist every action to benefit them and if it helps others what a great side effect, if not, they don't care their house has a gate and security "thanks for paying".