- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More proof that global warming is bullshite, Penguins are dying due to excessive ice
Posted on 10/15/17 at 4:24 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 10/15/17 at 4:24 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
I know it was a bit cold to lead you here, but the self-healing premise is your implication. That's the point. The fact you don't seem to realize it is actually comical. Terrestrial "self-healing" is requisite to warmists' understanding and explanation of ice age temp cycles.
Oh it is my implication now is it? All along I was the one pushing GAIA theories, not the two people that explicitly tried to suggest and defend them. I guess after a few poor attempts at trying to prop up that guy's argument you are just gonna try and pretend you were doing some M Night Shymalan bullshite. lol. But please, explain to me how it is a "requisite to warmists' understanding and explanation of ice age temp cycles."
This just gets more and more entertaining.
And warmists huh? Is this your new derogatory term for people who understand the relationship between temperatures and GHG's, orbital shifts, and remember how photosynthesis works?
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 4:26 am
1
Posted on 10/15/17 at 5:02 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:Of course it is.
Oh it is my implication now is it?
quote:
But please, explain to me how it is a "requisite to warmists' understanding and explanation of ice age temp cycles."
You are kidding? Atmospheric CO2 rises and falls. You believe that is the force driving terrestrial temp variation. Holding origins of all such variance as geoisolated, you have no explanation other than "self-healing".quote:Indeed.
This just gets more and more entertaining.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 5:57 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Atmospheric CO2 rises and falls. You believe that is the force driving terrestrial temp variation. Holding origins of all such variance as geoisolated, you have no explanation other than "self-healing
In this particular period, yes, CO2 and other GHG’s are the primary drivers of the increased aggregate temperatures and numerous other changes happening in the planet’s biosphere. The science on this is clear. In past periods of Earth’s history, sometimes other causations or relationships cause temperatures to rise or fall, such as orbital shifts, solar shifts, or changes in photosynthesis levels, but the basic relationship of how GHG’s trap heat is not in dispute.
There continues to only be one person here who has ever suggested the poster’s GAIA theory has merit, and that was you when you made an appeal to the posters point by suggesting a better understanding of a phantom ice age and Henry’s law as the reason I would somehow buy into that assertion. Which you still refuse to clarify.
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 6:14 am
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:27 am to bonhoeffer45
quote:Is it? Really?
In this particular period, yes, CO2 and other GHG’s are the primary drivers of the increased aggregate temperatures and numerous other changes happening in the planet’s biosphere. The science on this is clear.
So given such "clear science" and your comical aversion to its requisite self-healing premise, how then do you explain cyclical ice age CO2 variances?
I've asked several times. If you don't know, then simply say so.
quote:What "phantom" ice age are you referring to?
a phantom ice age
quote:Actually I did clarify.
Which you still refuse to clarify.
But let's try again.
You'll note I posted an ice core record earlier.
Perhaps you notice accordingly that as atmospheric CO2 falls to ~185ppm it tends to reverse trend, and rise to ~285ppm at which time it falls rather precipitously back to the 185 level. If the cause is terrestrial, it is self-healing. Pretty simple really.
FTR, I DGAS about Gaian theory, nor about "self-healing". You must. "Self-healing," I suppose, could involve nonbiologic triggers -- some sort of mystical climate induced volcanic activity, perhaps.
But as a warmist, you'll find yourself supporting a self-healing hypothesis in some form. You have to. Further, unless you propose a completely nonbiological mechanism for atmospheric CO2 undulation, you likewise must believe Gaia in some form. Again, it is requisite in any Earth isolated climate premise.
Sorry, but that should be fairly clear.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:35 am to RobbBobb
quote:
More proof that global warming is bullshite,
What?
Posted on 10/15/17 at 7:35 am to RobbBobb
Poli Board logic:
-carbon emissions contributing to climate change? So dumb
-the immaculate conception? Sounds legit
-carbon emissions contributing to climate change? So dumb
-the immaculate conception? Sounds legit
Posted on 10/15/17 at 8:22 am to DEG
Worldwide flood with no evidence? Sold!
Posted on 10/15/17 at 8:42 am to Esquire
quote:
Worldwide flood
quote:Indeed.
no evidence?
Posted on 10/15/17 at 9:41 am to NC_Tigah
Pics of canyons. Wow!
Posted on 10/15/17 at 9:59 am to Esquire
quote:Hint: If you post something dumb, don't double down.
Pics of canyons. Wow!
Posted on 10/15/17 at 10:06 am to RobbBobb
To bad they are a word apart. It would have been nice if the unfortunate penguins could have at least provided a free lunch for the poor downtrodden polar bears!
That's what happens when you leave Mommy Nature in charge!
That's what happens when you leave Mommy Nature in charge!
Posted on 10/15/17 at 1:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Hint: If you post something dumb, don't double down.
I'm fully aware of the sedimentary layers of the earths crust. Now please link something besides a picture of the Grand Canyon that shows evidence of the global flood that happened 6000 years ago and killed every living creature on the planet sans the ones on the Ark, which was built by 1 guy with Stone Age era tools. Crazy how it took 1000 people with modern construction knowledge to build the one in Kentucky. You know, the one filled with dinosaurs?
Posted on 10/15/17 at 1:32 pm to bonhoeffer45
quote:
Just sayin
It only says men don't want to come out and talk about Obama just yet.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 1:46 pm to Esquire
quote:Apparently though, you aren't fully aware of the reason those sedimentary layers are visible
I'm fully aware of the sedimentary layers of the earths crust.
quote:Along with the Dakota Badlands FYI.
besides a picture of the Grand Canyon
quote:
Tall as a five-story building, this wall of volcanic basalt in Drumheller Channels took shape 10 million years ago as lava cooled, shrank, and cracked vertically. Massive floods later ripped away sections, creating this pillared landmark.
quote:
Floodwaters scoured this chaotic labyrinth of channels into the bedrock of Babcock Bench, perched 600 feet above the Columbia River.
quote:
“During the ice-age floods, this entire scene was submerged beneath hundreds of feet of water,” says geologist Bruce Bjornstad. The Palouse River, shown here, "was hijacked and forced to follow a new route to the Snake River.”
quote:
Plummeting nearly 200 feet, Palouse Falls is a trickle compared to the megafloods that carved this canyon and shaped the surrounding landscape of eastern Washington State.
quote:
The basalt and granite boulders now littering the Ephrata Fan were carried there by torrents of water that gushed out of a canyon called the Grand Coulee. The largest piece of rock is more than 25 feet tall.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 2:16 pm to bonhoeffer45
I'm accusing Obama of raping me!!!
He did that to me and millions of others when he passed Obamacare which forced me out my plan and doubled my insurance payments.
Change your graphics.
He did that to me and millions of others when he passed Obamacare which forced me out my plan and doubled my insurance payments.
Change your graphics.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 2:18 pm to NC_Tigah
You aren't proving evidence of the Great Deluge. Large scale regional flooding, but no mass extinction event. Certainly not in the past 10000 years. Evidence man. Provide it.
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 10/15/17 at 2:35 pm to Esquire
quote:
Evidence man. Provide it.
Can you provide any evidence that man caused CO2 is driving the climate?
Environmentalism is one of the weirdest religion to come along since Scientology. CO2 is the invisible flying spaghetti monster that, if we don't genuflect to, will cause an apocalypse.
Posted on 10/15/17 at 2:38 pm to Dale51
quote:
Can you provide any evidence that man caused CO2 is driving the climate?
Nope, and never I could or defended the statement.
I believe in cyclical, global climate change. You're ignorant if you don't.
This post was edited on 10/15/17 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 10/15/17 at 2:41 pm to Esquire
quote:
Nope, and never I could or defended the statement.
Do you believe that human generated CO2 is a danger, or a problem facing the future of mankind?
Posted on 10/15/17 at 2:48 pm to RobbBobb
NEWSFLASH: Republicans don’t need no science or quantitative data. Random anonymous guys on the internet are the only people who know the truth. Just ask them. That’s what they will say.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News