Started By
Message
locked post

Mnuchin: Unemployment rate is 'not real'

Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:20 pm
Posted by MButterfly
Quantico
Member since Oct 2015
6860 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:20 pm
LINK


quote:

“I absolutely understand why he got elected,” said Mnuchin. “The average American worker has gone absolutely nowhere. The unemployment rate is not real.”



quote:

In so doing, Trump’s pick to head the Treasury Department dismissed the validity of one of the nation’s central economic guideposts, which currently sits at 4.7 percent.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

In so doing, Trump’s pick to head the Treasury Department dismissed the validity of one of the nation’s central economic guideposts, which currently sits at 4.7 percent.


CNN BREAKING NEWS:

Mnuchin hates math!
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:21 pm to
It's not.
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24954 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
Gotta be higher than 4.7%. I know my outlook is skewed due to being in a heavily oil field dominated area. Locally our numbers must be double digits.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
He's correct, but both sides massage those numbers.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27244 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
He's right. The labor participation rate needs to be taken into account, as well as part time vs. full time employment.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62423 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:23 pm to

Give them credit, they got Step 1 right!
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115737 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:23 pm to
Well its not. This has been pretty well established.
Posted by When in Rome
Telegraph Road
Member since Jan 2011
35540 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
EPI.org
quote:

In today’s labor market, the unemployment rate drastically understates the weakness of job opportunities. This is due to the existence of a large pool of “missing workers”–potential workers who, because of weak job opportunities, are neither employed nor actively seeking a job. In other words, these are people who would be either working or looking for work if job opportunities were significantly stronger. Because jobless workers are only counted as unemployed if they are actively seeking work, these “missing workers” are not reflected in the unemployment rate.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76518 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

He's correct, but both sides massage those numbers.
Nah. Trump was off by 1500%. That ain't massaging.
Posted by FreddieMac
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
20990 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
agreed, how do you consider someone out of the workforce as employed. really stupid.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
34074 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

“I absolutely understand why he got elected,” said Mnuchin. “The average American worker has gone absolutely nowhere. The unemployment rate is not real.”


Reality just entered the room.
Posted by dmjones
Acworth, GA
Member since Mar 2016
2303 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:25 pm to
Meh. I don't know a single person who wants to work that is unemployed.
Posted by tke857
Member since Jan 2012
12195 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:26 pm to
im more interested in "quality" jobs compared to the # of people that are qualified to obtain these quality jobs that are currently out of work and are looking for work.
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24747 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

He's right. The labor participation rate needs to be taken into account, as well as part time vs. full time employment.



dims changed the definition of full-time from 40 to 30 hrs. The real # is about 15%.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11178 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 11:24 pm
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
24747 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

agreed, how do you consider someone out of the workforce as employed. really stupid.




The same way they count seasonal jobs every year as real lasting job gains.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95333 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:32 pm to
Part of the skew is the length of time one has been out of the labor market.

People who don't get a job in X amount of time drop off automatically even if they are still looking. Not so coincidentally, Obama extended unemployment benefits significantly which helped people reach that mark.
Posted by DownSouthJukin
Coaching Changes Board
Member since Jan 2014
27244 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

dims changed the definition of full-time from 40 to 30 hrs. The real # is about 15%.


I knew they had changed the formula but couldn't remember how. Did they also change the formula to remove "unemployed and seeking work" people after a shorter period?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram