Started By
Message

re: Milo Yiannopoulos says he was not supporting pedophilia

Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:23 am to
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:23 am to
I believe it to be highly doubtful that Milo is a homosexual. He wasn't a few years ago. It's part of his new character.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140447 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:23 am to
quote:

He wasn't a few years ago


Wut?
Posted by TN Bhoy
San Antonio, TX
Member since Apr 2010
60589 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:27 am to
Milo has gone through a number of different characters. The only similarity between them has been tech geekery. Most have not been him as a homosexual. FFS, he spent a decent amount of time as a writer for a traddie Catholic newspaper before he was sacked for being a fraud.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140447 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:28 am to
So that makes him not gay? I guess you can just make up stuff as you go these days.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:28 am to
You can actually find old editorials from him lamenting that people are using free speech as an excuse for vulgarity
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:29 am to
Interesting. Do you have proof of this?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Muh homophobia


I love the gays. Pederasts, not so much.

Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146774 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:30 am to
Part II of Milo's FaceBook statemant. (Even though it is so obvious you want to convict the man in the court of public opinion: Because you are --a holier than thou art above all neocon-- diehard social conservative, with a small affliction of theocracy; butthurt about homosexuals to begin with.)

BTW: What does your sig image mean? Are you a Deacon/priest?



quote:

5. National Review, whose journalists are tweeting about this, published an article defending Salon for giving a pedophile a platform.

6. I did say that there are relationships between younger men and older men that can help a young gay man escape from a lack of support or understanding at home. That's perfectly true and every gay man knows it. But I was not talking about anything illegal and I was not referring to pre-pubescent boys.

7. I said in the same "Drunken Peasants" podcast from which the footage is taken that I agree with the current age of consent.

8. I shouldn't have used the word "boy" when I talked about those relationships between older men and younger gay men. (I was talking about my own relationship when I was 17 with a man who was 29. The age of consent in the UK is 16.) That was a mistake. Gay men often use the word "boy" when they refer to consenting adults. I understand that heterosexual people might not know that, so it was a sloppy choice of words that I regret.

9. This rush to judgment from establishment conservatives who hate Trump as much as they hate me, before I have had any chance to provide context or a response, is one of the big reasons gays vote Democrat.

10. In case there is any lingering doubt, here's me, in the same interview the other footage is taken from, affirming that the current legal age of consent is about right: "And I think the law is probably about right. It's probably roughly the right age. I think it's probably about ok. But there are certainly people who are capable of giving consent at a younger age. I certainly consider myself to be one of them, people who were sexually active younger. I think it particularly happens in the gay world, by the way."

This post was edited on 2/20/17 at 11:33 am
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:31 am to
quote:

You can actually find old editorials from him lamenting that people are using free speech as an excuse for vulgarity



So you're saying he had a gradual intellectual movement from being disgusted by degeneracy in modern culture to *Gasp* being disgusted by degeneracy in modern culture, but in a way that makes money and garners more attention?

Fantastic analysis there.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140447 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:33 am to
I can find old video clips of various dems supporting marriage being only for a man and a woman. So what?
Posted by cokebottleag
I’m a Santos Republican
Member since Aug 2011
24028 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:34 am to
You aren't a big fan of the jews either, apparently.

My hope is you can understand this blunt instrument. I don't really think you have jews, because the vast majority of your posts contradicts that. But in this particular post, you appear to be making a joke about anti-semitism.

Should I then label you an anti-semite?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146774 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:35 am to
quote:

I believe it to be highly doubtful that Milo is a homosexual. He wasn't a few years ago. It's part of his new character.

Link? Or you are making things up as you go along to fit your socon political narrative of neverTrump and you are holier than thou art?

You are at the very least very strange.

Care to explain, please?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:38 am to
quote:

Should I then label you an anti-semite?
Hey you do you, mane.
Posted by redneck hippie
Stillwater
Member since Dec 2008
5590 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:41 am to
I believe he's an act.
similar to Ann Coulter. says outrageous stuff for the sake of being outrageous.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112630 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:42 am to
Remember when your character was dim witted MSB troll? Good times. Now you've moved on to super Catholic creep.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
146774 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:49 am to
The left is fuming that Milo gained notoriety on Maher. So, they put him on the front burner to take down over KAC.

Why neverTrumpers like Bhoey are joining them, is beyond me.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:55 am to
quote:

The left is fuming that Milo gained notoriety on Maher.
he wouldn't have been on there if they hadn't made such a big deal out of him to begin with

they guy counts on bad press as his only press, and people who hate him just can't help themselves. the guy was doing campus shows, now he's on television...proof is in the pudding.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112630 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Why neverTrumpers like Bhoey are joining them, is beyond me.



Bhoy is an open borders shill who wants more brown skinned donors to the Catholic church within our country.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

I believe he's an act.
similar to Ann Coulter. says outrageous stuff for the sake of being outrageous.
that's disrespectful to anne coulter.

she's got a sweet little hustle going. she says some crazy shite, gets invited on a show. the panel doesn't read the book she's plugging (which is filled with talking points liberals typically use) and when she's on the show she turns off the crazy, and let's these people go nuts on her all while unwittingly using her talking points from the book



the conservative book racket annoys me to no end, but you have to give her credit for that. it's super funny.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112475 posts
Posted on 2/20/17 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

similar to Ann Coulter. says outrageous stuff for the sake of being outrageous.


You don't write books with 50 pages of foot notes to be outrageous.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram