- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:06 pm to DByrd2
quote:
replacement
Um, it's not a piece of furniture.
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:37 pm to skrayper
I am very attached to my dog, and consider her a family member. I would be willing to shoot at a cop that shot at my dog.
Posted on 12/24/16 at 9:43 pm to weagle99
No one has posted the best part of the opinion yet, which may or may not be in the article I didn't click on.
Some turncoats in the department were going to testify for the dog owner that the police in that precinct take great pride in shooting dogs, to the point when an officer shoots a dog he gets a sticker on his locker as a badge of honor. Court: that's pretty bad, but it still doesn't make them responsible for shooting these two particular dogs.
I listen to a very libertarian podcast from the institute for justice. One of the guys was joking that he'll gladly help write the petition to have the whole court try to reverse the panels dumb, dumb ruling.
Some turncoats in the department were going to testify for the dog owner that the police in that precinct take great pride in shooting dogs, to the point when an officer shoots a dog he gets a sticker on his locker as a badge of honor. Court: that's pretty bad, but it still doesn't make them responsible for shooting these two particular dogs.
I listen to a very libertarian podcast from the institute for justice. One of the guys was joking that he'll gladly help write the petition to have the whole court try to reverse the panels dumb, dumb ruling.
Posted on 12/24/16 at 10:49 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
Um, it's not a piece of furniture.
Dogs are considered "property" in the eyes of the law, sadly.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 12:57 am to C
quote:If my AC clicks on, cops have the right to shoot it?
It's property so yeah.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 12:58 am to skrayper
BUT only if it's Black
Posted on 12/25/16 at 1:23 am to Scoop
quote:
An a-hole dog that is big enough to cause harm to cops responding to a call and acting aggressively is a problem, though, right?
You mean like the ones un-armed animal control officers somehow approach and deal with on a daily basis without injury?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 2:08 am to ZacAttack
quote:
The ruling is regarding the police shooting your dog. Not you shooting your own dog.
oh wow, I just completely misread that.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 2:09 am to SlapahoeTribe
quote:
If the penalty for shooting a police dog is the same as shooting a police officer, then shouldn't the same requirements for a police officer shooting me be applied to shooting my dog? That is, shouldn't the officer be constrained by the same protocols?
This is bullshite!
agreed
Posted on 12/25/16 at 4:29 am to MrCarton
There are a lot of reasons I wouldn't go to Michigan, this is just one more. This kind of shite sucks.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:16 am to Five0
quote:
Having said that, a search warrant for an alleged heroin den with pitbulls isn't where I would want to fight this fight.
Police shoot a lot of dogs. We can have the legal fight wherever they want to.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:24 am to Chrome
quote:
Cats control the court's.
The court's what?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 6:29 am to skrayper
quote:
If the dog does anything other sit silently, they are justified in killing it.
Where did this new need derive?
hint:
Pit bulls and who owns the majority of those?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:05 am to BarberitosDawg
If a cop has a death wish, sure. Go ahead and shoot my dog.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:12 am to BarberitosDawg
quote:
Where did this new need derive?
hint:
Pit bulls and who owns the majority of those?
Citizens of this country. What's your point?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 7:33 am to BarberitosDawg
quote:
Where did this new need derive?
What new need are we talking about?
Posted on 12/25/16 at 8:11 am to Five0
quote:
If an Officer cannot discern and articulate when to shoot a dog and when not to shoot they likely do not need to be making choices on when to deprive someone of there freedom either.
I agree
Posted on 12/25/16 at 8:14 am to skrayper
A pit bull is automatically a threat. Sorry, poochie.
Posted on 12/25/16 at 8:39 am to funnystuff
Op edited the title
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News