Started By
Message

Members of Congress Living High on Welfare

Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:04 pm
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:04 pm
quote:

As one of their last actions with their majority, Democrats quietly tucked a provision into internal House rules that grants lawmakers access to an optional $34,000 annual subsidy to pay for their Washington, D.C., housing and meal expenses. Taxpayers have doled out over $8,700 to pay for the democratic socialist's lodging and meals throughout the first half of 2023, records show.

In total, 113 Democrats and 104 Republicans have taken advantage of the program, raking in a combined $1.4 million from taxpayers during the first half of 2023, House disbursement records reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon show. Recipients of these funds include at least 17 millionaire Democrats, including Rep. Katie Porter, who reported a net worth of up to $1.8 million in her latest financial disclosure, and House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D., Mass.), who boasts a net worth of up to $13.5 million.

quote:

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.) has billed taxpayers over $14,000 for lodging and meals during the first half of 2023. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D., Mich.) has received $6,800 from taxpayers to pay for her lodging and meals.

quote:

Rep. Matt Gaetz (R., Fla.) received the largest share of funds out of any lawmaker. The Florida Republican, who led the effort to oust former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy in part due to his budgetary policies, has billed taxpayers nearly $17,000 from January through May to pay for his D.C. living expenses. Gaetz received an additional $6,200 to pay for his meals during the same timeframe, an average of over $1,250 per month.

quote:

In a statement given to the Free Beacon, Gaetz said that he’s “complied with the law.”

“And my cooking is often with discount BOGO [Buy One, Get One] products. I try to do the best in the kitchen from the BOGO life,” he added.


Free Beacon
This post was edited on 11/2/23 at 2:05 pm
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59673 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:07 pm to
Of course they are within the law. The law is problem though.
Posted by GBPackTigers
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2009
1077 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:08 pm to
Can you name the one person in all of our country’s political history who didn’t take a government check or act like the tax payers were his personal piggy bank?

Need a hint?
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:13 pm to
$1250 a month for food is crazy, lol. That's more than the ladies we hate in groceries stores, pushing two baskets filled with steaks and toaster strudels.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260689 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Of course they are within the law. The law is problem though.


Yeah.
The idea that we control govt through vote is pure myth. Its just a long line of psychopaths waiting their turn.
Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17484 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:16 pm to
I know how lobbying works ... no Congressman is actually paying for their own food.
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

I know how lobbying works ... no Congressman is actually paying for their own food.

Yea, but lobbyist money is a longer way around to taxpayer money. They should at least have the decency to take the scenic route.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59673 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:19 pm to
They probably buying alcohol
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20004 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

democratic socialist's

Already a red flag that this is going to be one of "those" posts.

That being said, it's easy to mock all this and say it's grift.

Who here, though, lives in one place and travels to a work office somewhere else, and is expected to cover the costs of being there? Do we realistically expect them to maintain two homes to do this job?

Sure, some actually sleep in their office. Is that really the answer?

How about we just build them a dorm or pay a per diem?
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Who here, though, lives in one place and travels to a work office somewhere else, and is expected to cover the costs of being there? Do we realistically expect them to maintain two homes to do this job?

I get it. The problem is they create their own stipend.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60049 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:24 pm to
They have zero hesitance in using your hard-earned tax dollars to enrich themselves. Never mind that they would jail you in a heartbeat if you refused to grant them prima nocte to your earnings.

They feel they're entitled to these benefits.

frick every last one of them.
Posted by Walkthedawg
Dawg Pound
Member since Oct 2012
11466 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:31 pm to
They're all on obozocare too, right?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60049 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:33 pm to
We the people would be money ahead to build a secure dorm/apartment building for these leeches to live in while they're in DC.

Of course, this begs the question - do they need to spend so much time in Washington that they need to maintain two residences? What do they do in person (that's above board), that they can't do via telework?
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
20004 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

I get it. The problem is they create their own stipend.


Fine. Set up another mechanism for that.

Let's not pretend, though, that asking to have legitimate expenses means you are "Living High on Welfare".
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:35 pm to
Sorry. $34k per year is welfare.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
60049 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:35 pm to
Retired radio host Neal Boortz had an amazing suggestion for a Constitutional amendment - He wanted an amendment stating that Congress may pass no law to which they grant themselves an exemption. This came at the height of the Obamacare debacle, and serves as a perfect example of these parasites' hypocrisy. If the AFA was so great, then why didn't it become the default health plan for Congress?
Posted by Styxion
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2012
1597 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Who here, though, lives in one place and travels to a work office somewhere else, and is expected to cover the costs of being there? Do we realistically expect them to maintain two homes to do this job?


Let's not pretend they are forced to be there. They chose this job. It's not like they had a normal job and were forced into moving to another city for work. They make $174k that we know of. Yeah, I think they can cover their own expenses.

Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
3925 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

How about we just build them a dorm or pay a per diem?


How about they just stay home and vote via Zoom?

There's no need for a full time in-person Congress anymore.
Posted by lsusteve1
Member since Dec 2004
41931 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:43 pm to
Bunch of thieves
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 11/2/23 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

How about they just stay home and vote via Zoom?


Last thing a state rep wants is to be home near his/her constituents.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram